Steak made from human poop passes taste test

reply to post by neo96


Well done? Might as well toss a turd on the grill.

Of course, there will be an added surcharge for buying rich folks' sh!+ burgers, because they have a richer diet. That will be your "fillet de'scat".

The poor folks' processed burgers will be more high in fiber, therefore more healthier. Like fiber cocoa puffs!!! A little cheaper.

I think soylent green may have been a better idea. Like someone said, eat the rich... (Krokus)

Eat recycled food. It's good for the environment and okay for you!

How may I take your order today, may I interest you today's specials a # 2 ....

POOP BURGER: Japanese Researcher Creates Artificial Meat From Human Feces

reply to post by Agarta

Doesn't this mean it is not actually the poop that is eaten? It is the bacteria that is formed in the sewage that is processed. Therefore if would not be much different than yogurt, right?

That was almost relieving. Hmm... Sewgurt anyone? LOL

I agree with some posts below Agarta's about the sh1t they put in our food, already. I still can't come to terms with the fact that it costs "less" to research and produce artificial flavors than use the real thing... THAT is some sh1t right there!

Makes me wonder about most gas station beef jerkies and other "beef" products. Ever wonder about that? I mean, just look at it. If you don't know what i'm talking about, go out and buy one and check it out. Look at the way it's molded. Look at the texture. That looks nothing like real steak or whatever. It may not be sewage, but could be cow poop or other animal poop.

You know, for years i've known they have used horse meat as a substitute for most buffet foods. Like Ryans, Golden Coral, Harvest Table, or what ever other buffets you may have in your area. I know everyone has one of these cheap country buffets in their town. Most of that your eating is horse meat. Now for years I had a hard time swallowing that concept but I'd much rather in eat horse than ANY kind of poop. At least with horse meat the only problem you have is if you say "WHOAH" while your swallowing, it will stop in your throat and choke you.

But I'm willing to bet you they have already been using some kind of animal poop to form or shape some cheap meat we're eating now and we just don't know it. Look at everything else they use for other products. They always say, NOTHING of the animal gets wasted. The Indians and other tribal's were big believers in that. You think men on a mission to squeeze out every penny possible would waste that opportunity, especially since they themselves won't be dining?

reply to post by J.Son79


I would not doubt it at all. Good thoughts. So many products so many ingredients. They could slip a little poo in it and no one would know.

reply to post by Lysergic



meh i dont like blood

reply to post by J.Son79


Some food processes are down right disturbing! I read an article a few months ago about how margarine is made... I'm glad I switched to butter a few years ago!

But if you eat snails, you eat some of their poo, anyway. And this time, it's natural! We're stuck with the thing.

Soil is soil... And we generally love to work the earth...

reply to post by Bokaforo


Or spits and buggers... Big juicy ones... Who would notice in a 10 tons spaghetti sauce preparation?

Originally posted by NowanKenubi
reply to post by Bokaforo

 

Or spits and buggers... Big juicy ones... Who would notice in a 10 tons spaghetti sauce preparation?

The USDA does have an insect level of acceptance. Makes you wonder.

you know i was thinking that all the steak houses will have to change their names now.
how does ruth chris sh@@ house sound? or outback sh@@ house?

reply to post by Agarta


I read this very morning in the newspaper that Canada was sending a STRONG signal to manufacturers that CADMIUM would only be tolerated to a level of 0.013% in kids jewelry, now...

It's like saying "Poison them at a slower rate, please! Thanks!"

So the OP article remains of actuality, even if it is a hoax, because it presents mechanisms that are already in motion. Disturbing for a so called modern, civilized society.

reply to post by NowanKenubi


I was actually referring to your spaghetti example. Random bugs do get into our food during processing and the USDA allows for it and tests levels specifically, but instead of requiring companies to go sterile, they let us eat bugs. Then add to that which you said above that certain products ARE bugs.

reply to post by Bokaforo


With the debt crisis in the United States.....and the politicians not deciding anything yet...well...the (poop steak) may be the new food staple of the future....I'm just saying....(sarcasm)

reply to post by Agarta


What I meant in my previous post, is that the mechanism of "level of acceptance", as you said, is now a standard in virtually every possible market. , or rather,

How is it that we tolerate pollutants, insects or any other kind of suspect products in our food, or any other items we buy? It's all about the money, I know. It shows how low some humans can go for money.

Eating sh1t, or wearing poisonous material is, in my mind, the same problem.

I can understand an insect that falls in a sauce. They are small and are used to hiding where we won't see them.
But a metallic poison in a kid's toy is incomprehensible for me. No one could make me understand that... If it can't be produced safely, it shouldn't be made, period.

It makes me think of the reports about baby food with traces of uranium in it... You read that and go WT!? How is that even possible?

reply to post by NowanKenubi


Okay I'm with you. Along the poisons on toys line. I remember when the "boycott" of Chinese toys happened. I thought that was more than it was explained, because they knew the dangers of lead in paint from the long history of woman wearing it on their faces. It seems like it may have been on purpose.

Why isn't this issue, as to what they make our food or what they put in it not questioned? People everywhere read ingredient labels all the time for allergies and other reasons, why not question "Artificial Ingredients/Colors".

They may just give the bacteria an "Edible" name and send it out. Very few people would even wonder.

reply to post by Agarta


My wife got all excited by a new yogurt with fancy names labeled all over the place. I made a little research and some of the bacterias used were "developed" and "branded" by the yogurt company itself. My research showed that the scientific names given on the bottles were of marketing values only and that the scientific report ( the only one, actually ) about the validity of their claims was issued by themselves... They were even facing European courts for having made the same claims over there.

I guess it shows that with a big enough company, by the time they get caught, they will have made so much money that any fine given will be laughable to them.

I always laugh when I hear ads about new make-ups; " Contains improved Orloin-54! You will think you look younger and so will others! " But what is "Orloin-54"? As you say, no one asks. It's printed, so it must be true...

We tend to think manufacturers will be honest before being capitalistic. As if writing something was a commitment of honor...

reply to post by caladonea


great idea!!!! simply brilliant!!! make the congressman and obama eat a crap burger for breakfast lunch and dinner til they all get their heads out of their butt!!!!


i like it!!!!

I find this very hard to believe. I work in a sewer plant and there is no way to capture prairie dog logs without capturing everything else along with it. Besides that, the immense health hazards involved would render this improbable and unthinkable. This has to be a hoax. On the menu tonight may I recommend the green apple splatters with a side of corn log. lmAo

Soylent Green is...is...YECCCH!!!