What is this new black tail on Venus?

My buddy here says the sun has become strangely active in the corona, yet no sunspot activity:

I've just downloaded the current C3 footage, and that tail is moving in relation to Venus, and growing from what I can tell. Very curious! Also of note, the C2 footage (I get them from solarham) hasn't been updated since yesterday.

Wow, the pics have changed just since I've made this thread, all the pics with the sun activity and flaring have disappeared and now they are all showing this black tail. What's going on?

I keep telling myself to screen capture, yet I never do

reply to post by KSprepared


Patience,, the science centre needs to assure the best quality images are made available to the public,,its in there charter,, the "low res..yucky stuff,, " well its not very good quality in most cases,, glitchs,,flares,,thread,,
So patience,, play some muzac,, you know elevator music,,,

Originally posted by Helious
Absolutely nothing! Don't pay any attention to the major storms on Saturn, don't worry about Pluto turning red or anything about all of the planets in the solar system warming up at the same time, everything is completely normal!

Sir, you provoked me to log in and say this:
star for style.

----

Originally posted by zookey

Wasn't there a theory that Venus was a Comet that got stuck into this orbit and still has its tail?
Is Venus spinning in the opposite direction to other planets?
Just askin.

Sir, astronomy basics...body with 6,051.8 km radius is not a comet.

upd, ahh, btw, soho, etc images:
sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov...
umbra.nascom.nasa.gov...

actual view.


personally, i think that's Venus "shadow" is effect of digital "overburning" of picture(same thing happens sometimes with some digital cameras when VERY bright object is fooling a matrix, or rather cam software - certain area becomes dark, whether it is not).
but, why Venus "overburned" sensor at this particular moment...well, i do not know.
Just layman opinion(and amateur astronomer, in analog past..).
---------
upd2: funny thing is, that as i was writing post.... movie "solar flare" started in tv(lol).

sorry for my english.

'What we see in LASCO is Venus and this time has a luminosity 10 times higher than normal. If we look closely at the chart positions Elenin, the brightness of Venus clearly because Elenin, the "Cluster" is right Mercury behind the position of intersection with the orbit of the Earth (From the perspective of LASCO) and both nodes A and B Satellite Stereo, so the brightness of Venus appears SOHO-LASCO amplified 10 times.

Question: A simple comet produces the indirect effect of increased light? The answer: NO, unless it has an associated Orto of considerable size, ie other associated objects, comets, asteroids, etc ... and the tail is directly affecting their transition to the satellite orbit Stereo, node A.

The coming days 1-20 August will be key to understand and see Elenin and exit from doubts as to its composition, nature and travel companions'

This was said by a group of about 200 amateur astronomers in S. America, here is a translated version of their article:

translate.google.com... 23%2Felenin-el-cluster-y-la-hora-de-la-verdad-desconcierto-en-la-nasa%2F

This looks to be an image artifact NASA calls Background Subtraction and they use post images of Venus to describe it.

So then what would cause so much reflective light that they would have to subtract it? It says this is used primarily when the camera is pointing at the sun. My last post pointed out a possible cause of extra light.

'Sometimes bright planets get mistakenly folded into the HI1 background calculations, creating dark "holes" in the data. For example, below is an image of the planet Venus as seen by HI1-B on September 15, 2009, compared with an image from a few days later. The computer is subtracting too much scattered light at the earlier location of Venus.'

or maybe what was there that has since moved causing too much subtraction from this area?

This movie is amazing: sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov...

put in dates of 2011-07-24 to 2011-07-25

reply to post by KSprepared


Its broken the movie?

reply to post by Ophiuchus 13


yeah, it wouldn't let me link to it

I put new link, use lasco c3

Originally posted by KSprepared
reply to post by Ophiuchus 13

 

yeah, it wouldn't let me link to it

SMH maybe you are on to something Still I thank you for your efforts - got to see something new. ALSO notice no Phage yet what does that mean? As Phage always comes in to clarify space related potentials.

Maybe nobody knows what it is yet

I just saw that that is not really venus but an icon representing venus??

maybe it is covering something that the camera is picking up, but they made it larger, still not big enough to cover everything, but it would be suspicious if they made it suddenly larger. Not any more suspicious than a huge black tail though.

Ok.

So now some amateur astronomers are calling this a 'cluster' and not a comet? wtf

These black spots happen a lot... and every time someone makes a another topic about it. Here is one from 2009:

www.abovetopsecret.com...



I believe it has to do with the different wavelengths of light. You see, the "blue" satellite images only shows the shorter wavelengths, and the "red" satellite images shows the longer wavelengths. That is why the images are different colors.

That dark spot you all are looking at is most probably an internal reflection, and it is dark because the light hitting that area (the reflection) is not the correct wavelength to show up on the "blue" images.

There is probably a lot of light hitting that dark area, but the "blue" images are only supposed to show the shorter wavelengths, and the light hitting that area must have been a longer wavelength, so it just shows up as black. It's like the black streaks you see coming out of the Sun.

I bet that dark spot doesn't show on any of the longer wavelength images.

Leonid Elenin's site Spaceobs once had it shown as a cluster also if I remember right, although everyone was laughing about it.

reply to post by gift0fpr0phecy


Yes, it does look like background subtraction, but that is caused I believe when a bright object moves in line with the sun and the software removes too much light to compensate or something like that. So what moved in close to venus to make it overcompensate here?

Originally posted by KSprepared
reply to post by gift0fpr0phecy

 

Yes, it does look like background subtraction, but that is caused I believe when a bright object moves in line with the sun and the software removes too much light to compensate or something like that. So what moved in close to venus to make it overcompensate here?

Where Venus was, background subtraction leaves voids after exposure, like the blind spots you see after looking at something bright, for a while.

Plasma created by discharge of electricity between bodies, in the Electric Universe.

Venus had many discharges in the past, even relating to allignments.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Videos here, relating to the EU universe, and symbols of this in mythology relating to Saturn/Venus/Mars, and search for symbols of an alien sky.

Bear in mind that everything they list as archetypes are plasma releases from electrical discharge and the idea of a golden age with planets close to earth in allignment, stacked to form one layered image, is CODE. This golden age means the next cycle, and symbols for allignments and anything close to earth or electrical EM discharges really mean DISASTER.

The world religions and all these drawings, and the scars on mars, are all signs of EM discharge and are identical to what can be duplicate in plasmology experiments.

So these things used as mythology and past religions, for the masses, were really, coding for their science, and warnings of times, signs to look for, and disasters. So they're like a library of information for the next generation of bloodlines, they're own children, since its the same lineages basically.

Venus is showing signs of interaction. I imagine that Venus, Mars, and Satrun, which were mentioned heavily, are some of the main players in this.

reply to post by KSprepared


What was shown on his site was a time lapse photo. At the time it was the only way to get a clear photo of the comet.