It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

My first ufo experience with pictures

page: 3
6
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 25 2011 @ 02:06 PM
link   
soory dude !!not a ufo .disapointed by ur pic!!!!!!!



posted on Jul, 25 2011 @ 02:19 PM
link   
The question is, did you actually see the object before shooting the photo or was the photo taken and the UFO found on the image after?



posted on Jul, 25 2011 @ 07:47 PM
link   
If the OP is unable or unwilling to answer simple questions about the camera used, or to post the unedited originals, then I think this should be moved to HOAX.

He has had planty of opportunity to post original pics. The ones he said were right off the camera were created by GD-Graphics library sofware system. (With reduced quality.... set to 80 see?)

exif infor comes up as:

File Type JPEG
MIME Type image/jpeg
Comment CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 80
Encoding Process Baseline DCT, Huffman coding
Bits Per Sample 8
Color Components 3
File Size 162 kB
Image Size 1,024 × 768
Y Cb Cr Sub Sampling YCbCr4:2:0 (2 2)

I think something fishy is going on. Why are these not the originals as you said they were OP?



posted on Jul, 25 2011 @ 09:35 PM
link   
reply to post by Shamatt
 


Seriously? My third post in this thread is the original.
Sometimes you guys make me wonder....
And i cant recall how mant times i said it was 8 megapixels.
If you want to be specific the galaxy s 2 camera.
edit on 25-7-2011 by SkepticUnderdog because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 12:17 AM
link   
All info is important when talking about a UFO. The time of day, the camera make and model, the resolution used, everything.

Unfortunately it's a dash on a photo. Nothing will ever be proven from that picture. It could just as easily be a bird or bug or dust or some other debris. You don't know it's huge.. how do you know it's not between you and the crane, or even just 2 feet in front of you? You didn't see it.. if something that "huge" was hovering over the crane, one would think you would have noticed it.

I've taken several pictures of dots or what-not.. a perfect white circle high above me taken out of my sunroof while in the line of a drive through, for example. Probably a weather balloon. No way to tell honestly. And no reason to post it, as it proves nothing at all.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 01:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by SkepticUnderdog
reply to post by Shamatt
 


Seriously? My third post in this thread is the original.
Sometimes you guys make me wonder....
And i cant recall how mant times i said it was 8 megapixels.
If you want to be specific the galaxy s 2 camera.
edit on 25-7-2011 by SkepticUnderdog because: (no reason given)


I think I might have figured out your problem.

I suspect you are using the upload function on the camera to load the pictures onto the internet? If I am right this explaines the problem. Ypu see that samsung will automatically compress files for upload, hence the misleading exif data on the file. You will have to connect the phone to a computer and transfer the file in full un- atered. When you do this the exif data will show the correct details and the file will not go through extra compression. In other words - we will get the full 8Mp immage.

If this is not the case then you will need to explain why the file has been compressed, and where the missing exif data is. It just looks dodgy to have this information missing.

ETA - here is a forum post which shows the exif data which is missing from your pics :

www.samsunggalaxysforum.com...
edit on 26-7-2011 by Shamatt because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 7 2011 @ 04:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by bluemooone2
reply to post by SkepticUnderdog
 


Well , whatever it is , it does not appear to be attached to the crane.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/9cc6069f93dd.jpg[/atsimg]



I don't mean to say you faked this, but in that picture it almost looks like it was pasted in there.

It's probably just the pixelation.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join