Originally posted by MysticPearl
Does anyone is the government actually care about us? As someone is my late 20's, I'm pretty fearful of what exactly the economical landscape in
this country will look like in a decade or two. Why the f*** does our government want to help out just about everyone besides the people within it's
borders!?
Relax.
While everything written in this thread is probably true, the larger framework is missing.
Prior to the Federal Reserve business would frequently be bankrupted by currency wars between banks in different states, and all money printed was
subject to influence by politicians and political mood swings. This was solved by taking the printing of money away from our political class.
Something I thought England would have learned from by now.
While the outrageousness of the information in this thread is true,
what is also true is that getting the public all whipped up over it
will serve only one force in the end, and that is the political class.
They
want the public to demand the government get control of printing money.
But I submit to you that the Fed has actually done well managing our money.
Originally posted by jlafleur02
Doesn't mean that we produce that much more, but that we pay that much more. Hence the lost value of the dollar
Sort of, yeah,
but not in the proportions one thinks.
We have one hundred times more,
our dollar should be diluted by a hundred,
yet it is only diluted by 10.
Effectively the consistent management of the Federal Reserve has made our dollar
ten times stronger than it should have been,
and instead of depressions where our erratic congress should have gone bankrupt
it didn't cause the Fed can lightly apply the breaks, or gently accelerate
depending on how they evaluate the value of American policy.
By setting interest rates to near zero a couple of years ago,
the Fed was saying to congress,
'this is so dumb, that I can floor it and the car will go absolutely no where at all. Ever'.
The interest rate the Fed charges is like changing the acceleration on a high speed object.
Take a tennis ball.
The Fed can hit the ball back a little harder, a little softer, with a little top spin just like an olympic pro.
Lately our government, I feel they are influenced by wall street,
has been hitting tennis balls out of bounds, giving the Fed
nothing to return serve with.
In fact the Fed looks a little undignified running around after the ball. It's on their side now after all.
Maybe Wall Street wants to crack the Fed, so they can over see that too.
Me, I'd feed the Wall Street Bankers to The president, and call Fault on them.
The Fed I would give a commendation.
David Grouchy
the currency has lost 97% of its value
Let me invert this number. This is the same thing as saying each dollar we have should be equal to 33.33 dollars of buying power, if there had been
no inflation. [100 -97 = 03%] So where did the other 32.33 dollar go.
Well there are three times as many people in the USA as there were in 1913.
[color=gold]1913 97,225,000
[color=gold]2010 310,133,338
so lets adjust for the 3x population... I mean we don't want 2/3rds of the population walking around with access to zero dollars. How would they
eat?
33.33 dollars divided by 3 = 11.11 dollars
So where did the other 10.11 dollars go.
Well here is a comparison of the GDPs from 1913 and 2009
[color=gold]1913 39,100
[color=gold]2010 14,237,200
14,237,200
/ 39,100
= 364.12
divided by the 3x population
364.12 / 3 = 121.37
In English that means our domestic product is 121 times more, per person, than it was in 1913. This means that we produce one hundred times as much,
[color=gold] but our dollar has only had to be diluted by one tenth to cover all those purchases. Technically, and as you allude too if not
for oil, our dollar should be worth about ten cents this day. Has the quality of our product also gotten 10x better in value? Then a dollar should
only be worth 1 cent.