It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Hacker collective Anonymous posted on its Web site that it has taken a gigabyte of data from NATO.
On a Twitter feed believed to be run by the group, a Thursday morning message said that the hackers had obtained a lot of material that would be “irresponsible” to publish.
Originally posted by drakus
If this is the direction Anonymous is taking, good for them, although I'm convinced it'll be pointless if the whole campaing is not accompanied by organization and "knowing.-each.-other", I don't share this modern idea that all we need is the internet, no, you need to MEET with your equals, SHARE what you'be lived and learnt and WALK togheter, the "anonymous" characterization makes it imposible to build a "real-life" movement...
[url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/faster-forward/post/anonymous-claims-attack-on-nato/2011/07/21/gIQA6J6eRI_blog.html]www.washingtonpost.com[/u rl]
(visit the link for the full news article)
AnonymousIRC:
"NATO strongly condemns any leak of classified documents, which can potentially endanger the security of.." RLY. Guess what we did NOT leak?
AnonymousIRC:
Hi NATO. Yes we haz more of your delicious data. You wonder where from? No hints, your turn. You call it war; we laugh at your battleships.
Originally posted by Elsek
Originally posted by drakus
That is a very very good point, but it will for obvious reasons never come to that. They love the idea of anonymity...and why wouldnt they?
Originally posted by drakus
Nato Hacked, Anonymous Claims
www.washingtonpost.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Hacker collective Anonymous posted on its Web site that it has taken a gigabyte of data from NATO.
On a Twitter feed believed to be run by the group, a Thursday morning message said that the hackers had obtained a lot of material that would be “irresponsible” to publish.