It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by flexy123
Originally posted by Thunda
reply to post by flexy123
Sorry pal- too many uninformed opinions for me to deal with in one lunch break- I would like you to point me to the evidence of the Norway spiral being "viral ad campaign".
Also,"The point is there IS a possible, logical explanation and unless DISPROVEN a "UFO" theory cannot be accepted. Simple as that. "- oh well, if its that simple..........gosh, Im embarrassed- guess that the whole UFO question wrapped up then!
no, the whole. But about 98% of all so called "sightings".
I'm not joking about the fact that there's no sign of intelligence in the movement of those balloons. After they are pulled out on the string, the movement is very haphazard and not intelligent. That is in fact an informed observation, which some people choose to disregard and still claim "intelligence" when it's anything but. I was being tongue in cheek about the drunk alien pilots but it really does look more like that, than any kind of intelligence. And it looks even more like turbulence than either one of those options.
Originally posted by Thunda
No, what makes me happy is addressing the OP's question with informed debate, not spouting trite comedic opinions, but hey, Its not gonna be my day is it
Did you watch the video I posted?
Originally posted by flexy123
I agree, but your "plane flies by" is another logical mistake
In fact, we do NOT see a plane fly by. We see a cut in the scene, and then a NEW SCENE, a very lengthy camera pan....and then (zoomed in) a plane "somewhere on the sky".
Obviously, there is no "orb" or whatever present in the scene with the plane.
Probability I would take advice from someone who can't spell: 0.01%
Originally posted by Elvis Hendrix
Their not balloons einstein i think you need a new prescription.
Whoever is pulling the string is off camera.
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
That's nice. But you didn't answer any question I posed. Where is the string, and who is pulling it? You seemed 99.999% sure that they are balloons on a string. So show me the reasoning behind your argument.
Originally posted by Thunda
reply to post by redtic
By your own arguement, these objects are all in the original object. How is that possible that the original object, which seems to be almost the same size as the spheres it is ejecting, contains all these objects. It does not change size or shape- are you suggesting that somehow it blow the balloons up as it ejects them?.
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
reply to post by Arbitrageur
That's nice. But you didn't answer any question I posed. Where is the string, and who is pulling it? You seemed 99.999% sure that they are balloons on a string. So show me the reasoning behind your argument.
Here we go again with the balloon theory. God can you munters not come up with anything more original. What a joke.
i always thought these things look more like organic life rather than flying machines!.Hey there is very wierd looking life forms swarming around in our deepest oceans, why not in the upper atmoshphere?
like the tether incident, there just organisms that just happen to live up there. they dont have to be intelligent!
Their not balloons einstein i think you need a new prescription.
Originally posted by SonoftheSun
Einstein and an insult...Your replies are just getting better aren't they ??
If they are not balloons, could you please provide us with your supreme insight ??
I await with bated breath.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Originally posted by SonoftheSun
Einstein and an insult...Your replies are just getting better aren't they ??
If they are not balloons, could you please provide us with your supreme insight ??
I await with bated breath.
Aliens. Duh.