Originally posted by operation mindcrime
No no, you are getting it all wrong. I have absolutly no interest in the subject put forth by the OP. The thing that bothers me is the fact that the
OP is grouping molestation, raping and bestiality together with homosexuality.
One does not need a whole lot of brain power to understand that there is a clear seperation between one and the other.....
So, if you have no interest in the subject, then you're attempting to derail and hijack the thread, correct? Just pointing out an observation.
The OP even continues to color his work with the added comment
Hmm.. I don't want to be making love with farm animals.
Which also implies that he doesn't want to rape people, molest people or make love to people of the same sex thus reinforcing the perceived
connection between them!!
In all fairness, do you think you might be reading into this a little much? I wouldn't want to make love to farm animals either, but does that make
me a gay basher? No. And he did NOT state what you felt he implied....that is what you assumed. I didn't get that impression, personally.
However, even if the OP DID mean to group all these together....is he not within is right to do so? I mean, are we so damned sensitive that we can't
give each other enough respect to have opinions that differ from our own? The OP might, in fact, feel that gay sex is no better than those other
things mentioned. If he does, so what? It supported a theory he posted, which I think was relevant, but you've expressed no interest in. It's OK
if you don't agree, you do understand that, right?
Please let us keep this civil and get to the bottom of this, no gay bashing here; just gay understanding
I find this comment very very hard to combine with his earlier statement. Maybe my language skills are preventing me from expressing my objection to
this thread clearly but if there is a certain "tone" to this thread that is not clearly respresented by what the OP wrote, maybe the OP should word
his OP differently!!
It's insulting as it is insulting to say that people with a mustach are evil because Hitler had a mustach....
Peace
Comparing evil with a mustache because of Hitler in relation to this doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I know that ANY mention of God or the Bible
will get folks riled up in a heartbeat, but it goes without saying that the good book was the first one to group these sexual "activities" together.
It's not a crime to do so. It matters not if you subscribe to the Bible or not...many people do, and that is their right, just as it is yours to
believe what you wish.
Clearly, this struck a sensitive chord with you, and you're taking it personal. This is what I wish folks would stop doing when they read a
statement they don't like....unless that statement or thread was addressed to them personally, there's absolutely NO REASON to take it personally.
Stay emotionally removed from it so it can be discussed, because all the drama from the emotion of whatever it is people feel, gets in the way of what
would otherwise be interesting conversation.
I am very interested in the theory, and not just because of the gay issue, but for all human issues. I find it curious that you aren't the least bit
interested in the theory at all, but would rather argue over a few sentences. What if the theory is correct? What then? Will what he said even
matter? Because if the theory is correct, then those statements you're angry about are correct.