posted on Jul, 18 2011 @ 04:25 AM
reply to post by moosevernel
Thanks, moosevernel for that highlighted picture. It does indeed look like there was more of a path there at one time. In fact, it seemed even easier
to see from the plane. While there was little vegetation, there were definitely paths worn into the dirt. After looking at a couple other threads on
unidentified structures, I found many people thought Bing's map service provided better pictures than Google's. I had not yet used Bing, being sort of
a Google fanboy, but I was able to find some nice images using Bing. I especially like their feature where you can get satelite images from multiple
angles.
First, a picture that matches up with the one I already posted, just drier looking. So, this is a little closer to what I saw from the plane, though I
want to say that it was even drier/dirtier when I flew in (more like the field on the west side of the road, left side of the picture), literally just
dirt with no visible vegetation.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b712329a4c9e.png[/atsimg]
Next, and this is the cool part, the Bing map looking southward, flipping the direction. It seems to give us a better look at the walls of the
structure.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/52f513aad632.png[/atsimg]
reply to post by taccj9903
Hey Channelingmyself (taccj9903), that's a great offer! I don't live in Denver, and even if I did, I'm really busy with work right now, so probably
couldn't do anything soon anyway! I'll let you know, but I'm sure many of us would find an in-person investigation interesting.
edit on 18-7-2011 by FrostyPhilosopher because: Adding a reply-to tag
edit on 18-7-2011 by FrostyPhilosopher because:
Grammar