It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Possible Ufo tagging along w/ second plane Before Impact? (911 Footage)

page: 4
23
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 18 2011 @ 04:09 PM
link   
This youtube link is interesting with a take on doctored 9/11 video, both by MSM and amateurs.

You don't have to take everything expressed as gospel, but since the Tina Cart video, the subject of this thread, is featured in this link it is worth a look.

There is no doubt that soundtracks have been interfered with, and it seems also that Tina Cart's voice is dubbed over at least one MSM docu. It also has a sound recording of the WTC1 strike from Ginny Carr's dictaphone, that records two consecutive explosions, and a possible explanation,

www.youtube.com...

I thought I should add this WTC1 good quality Naudet clip analysis, as the follow on. You must make up your own mind,

www.youtube.com...
edit on 18-7-2011 by smurfy because: Add link.



posted on Jul, 18 2011 @ 04:27 PM
link   
There was a series of 9/11 videos that showed how the "pod" on the belly of the second plane shown on so many videos was actually a video artifact from overlaying the plane "on the fly",... with a 25 sec delay,...over the supposed missile, and then the software used couldn't distinguish the "missile" from the "overlayed" plane, and drew both... making it appear that there was a "pod" on the underside of the plane...

I thought I saved the bookmark to those vids, but I can't find 'em sorry




posted on Jul, 20 2011 @ 01:34 PM
link   
Look guys, I love that fact you are pursuing the search for ET UFO's. I do have a strong, let's call it a belief, in ET/Dimensional beings. That exist and are visiting us, I say visiting because we don't really know what it is they're doing. We can only comment and speculate.

However, they're way too many angles of the second plane colliding into the tower. The videos we're obviously recorded live, shown live, over and over. No UFO's, unless you account for the debris, but it's identified... IFO.

The one thing I hate about debunkers, is that they believe everything is anything but a ET UFO.
However, what I hate about my fellow believers is that they think every single damn object in the air is a UFO flown by ET's.

9/11 sucked, I've heard some people say that UFO's were observing it close up and they've given me all the scenarios on why they would. And I've even heard people trying to say it was caused by ET's... that's retarded.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, do your research thoroughly before taking advantage of the gullible believers out there.



posted on Jul, 20 2011 @ 06:00 PM
link   
I had a look at the object before and after, which required several hours of editing - The before object and after object do not appear to be the same.

Here is a though maybe it is a new type of high speed drone controlling the jet via remote.

God Bless America



posted on Jul, 20 2011 @ 10:40 PM
link   
i think theres more supporting evidence towards ufo. its clearly not a part of the plan. if it was a debris then why would it go behind the tower?



posted on Jul, 20 2011 @ 11:24 PM
link   
Very interesting.

At first I thought it was just a piece of the plane or building that flew off.

But then I saw the object up close before the explosion.

Thats a pretty small UFO though, just saying.



new topics

top topics
 
23
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join