It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In afganistan there is almost no programmes for addicts and with heroin so readily available gettin clean would be very hard. Personaly I believe if you wana take heroin you should be allowed to., but you certainly shouldnt be given a weapon and trained to be a soldier. Even weed which may be ok for you can cause problems in a lot of people, paranoia especially would be a very bad side effect for sldiers in a corrupt country.
Many people have addicitons now to all kindsa things from computer games to coffee to hard drugs. I think that this rate of pure drug addiciton is very worrying, I have unfortunately had experience with people very close to me who have become heroin addicts and I can tell you that you can not trust anyone with that addiction and they will not be capable of soldiering.
You bring up a great point. Sure, it's easy to point the finger at people in other countries and condescend them as if we're some superior race, but they're not the only soldiers who are addicted to opium.
Makes me wonder how many American soldiers are hooked on the drug too......another sweep under the rug?
Pentagon statistics obtained by FoxNews.com show that the number of Army soldiers enrolled in Substance Abuse Program counseling for opiates has soared nearly 500 percent -- from 89 in 2004 to 529 last year. The number showed a steady increase almost every year in that time frame -- but it leaped 50 percent last year when the U.S. began surging troops into Afghanistan. Army troop levels in Afghanistan went from 14,000 as of the end of 2004 to 46,400 as of the end of 2009.
I will lecture you, because you're here spreading propaganda when studies show that it's clear cannabis has no negative health consequences, other than short term memory loss while under the influence.
Please dont lecture me about drug use and what a substance may or may not do.
You should see if AboveTheInfluence is hiring, you'd make a great addition to the biased organization. She never had problems with alcohol, so that makes it good? What about the fact that alcohol kills 100,000 American citizens annually, since she doesn't think about global warming while drunk, that makes it OK, even though there's the possiblity that she could crash her car while drunk or get alcohol poisoning and die?
Weed affects different people in different ways, my girlfriend had never had any trouble with drink or other drugs before, this one changed her mental state so much it was frightening, she would be terrofied about global warming and all sorts of things that where no immediate danger to her, when she stopped she changed almost over night and finished her degree wihtout any other issues, coincidence?
Sounds like a personal problem, blaming personality flaws on a harmless plant is beyond ignorant. Just because they're irresponsible and can't keep a cool-head when they're not stoned doesn't mean that cannabis is bad.
Her housemate who smoked a LOT of it as well went mental over the smallest things, I knew him for 3 years in total and this only started happening when they both stated smoking.
I am about as informed as they get about cannabis, I've spend more time researching this topic than you could imagine. "Real life issues", yeah because smoking weed really tears families apart, right? You always hear on the news about a husband beating his wife and children after coming home from smoking some weed. There's always the news story about the cannabis smoker who sells all of his possessions and turns to a life of crime because they're hopelessly addicted and need to feed their non-stop craving for a harmless plant.
On the other hand I played in a band with a guy who smoked all day and everyday, like I aid it affects people in different ways. Anyone who quotes surveys and experiments etc obviously isnt clued up much about drugs because these rarely reflect real life issues with drugs and sample small number of people or sample large numbers of people but dont go into any significant detail.
Smoking cannabis does not pose any negative health consequences. None. Nada. Zero. Zip. El-Zilcho. Just because your ex-girlfriend and her housemate got a little cranky doesn't mean that we need to spend billions of dollars enforcing our drug laws in another country. I get cranky when I don't drink coffee in the morning, so should we also prevent Afghan soldiers from drinking caffeine? Because if they're addicted to caffeine and don't drink coffee in the morning, they could become dangerously upset, and since they're in a position of power, who knows what could happen.
So please dont talk like that, its silly to say it doesnt affect anyone badly at all.
I don't think it's the best idea, but they seem to be handling the situation so I don't really care. If they want to shoot up some heroin before picking up a weapon, let them, we don't have have a single penny to spare policing another country.
I have nothing but the deepest sympathy for addicts and their families mate. I have lost people close to me from heroin addiciton. I dont judge like that, but that doesnt mean that Ithink they should have a wepon! If a soldier in the army undergos a substance abuse programme for heroin then good for them and good for the army for being understanding and helping the situation. But you cant seriously think its ok for them to be high whilst fighting and protecting their fellow soldeirs though?!?!
It might be dangerous to have soldiers using drugs, but you're forgetting (or maybe you just don't know) that all illegal drugs kill around 16,000 annually, compared to 500,000 from the legal tobacco and alcohol. I would rather have soldiers using illegal drugs and picking up a weapon than getting blacked out drunk and handling an AK47, wouldn't you agree? I hear about people losing their temper and doing something dangerously irresponsible when they're drunk 500X more than I hear about somebody using heroin and stabbing somebody to death or something like that.
I am not having a go at addicts, im stating that addicts cant be used in a military, its just too dangerous. To our soldiers as well the the Afgan armys. Drug addiciton is often due to other factors like depression etc so its perfectly understandable why a soldier or anyone who has seen combat would get hooked to make life easier. I think tis amazingly great that the US army has a programme to help addicts as well, I think in the UK you get kicked out as soon as you fail a drug test.
I agree, but we cannot be worrying about that right now. This country is on the brink of....I don't even know the word to describe it. Total failure. We can't be worrying about some drugged up soldiers, let them sort it out themslves. If friendly fire skyrockets, I'm sure they'll reckognize the danger and take it into consideration. Just because they're not American doesn't mean they're all mentally retarded.
All the research in the world is no substitute for real life experience. I actually believe that people should be able to do whatever drug they want if they choose, just not if you are in control of a weapon and peoples lives so I hardly think that any anti drug organisation would hire me
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e4b845c46c32.jpg[/atsimg]
It might have no physical health issues (besides damaging the lungs) but mentally it most certainly can effect many people.
The more tobacco a person smoked, the greater their risk of developing lung cancer and other cancers of the head and neck. But people who smoked more marijuana were not at increased risk compared with people who smoked less and people who didn’t smoke at all.
Oh no, paranoia! Call the cops, the neighbor is paranoid!
If you have done your research you should know this as there is a wealth of rsearch confirming this, im sure you will quote me from reports denying this so with all this conflicting data how de we know? My personal experience tells me this, I metn that she had no other issues that would effect her mental state, it was odd that she changed so fast after using it and changed back after stopping almost right away as well. Cannabis does in some cases cause paranoia, like I said it effects different people in different ways like loads of things do.
You're pushing the idea that smoking weed can make people go crazy with rage and paranoia, and that's a big load.
I am not spreading propaganda, just stating what I have experienced
That sucks, if somebody can't smoke weed without being a short-tempered anger/paranoia machine, then if they're not intelligent enough to decide for themselves that they shouldn't smoke, I'm not going to blame the harmless plant, I'll blame the irresponsible individual.
Trust me im not making random assumptions, my whole life from my teens ive been surrounded by people using different drugs, weed being the most popular. Most people are ok on it but some it does effect badly and thats the truth.