UFO over South Africa on Google Earth, very clear picture

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by tpg65

 

If it's moving IN THEORY it should turn up again.

If it was moving too fast to be captured more than once it should show motion blur.

If it was hovering, why aren't people staring at it taking photos of it???

Sorry if you can't bring yourself to look at this objectively.

It did turn up again . Go to the first page of this thread ( roughly halfway down) and take a look at the image that contains our friend in the hood . Now look diagonally up to the left of the UFO , following the line the UFO would naturally take . You will notice a motion blurred object . Now depending on the stitching of the images , this could easily be the ufo as it is leaving .

How's that for objectivity ?

reply to post by tpg65


I see a faint dash, good eye for seeing that I must say.

So that's the proof needed then I guess?

A faint dash.

And no one saw it??

Now depending on the stitching of the images , this could easily be the ufo as it is leaving

No if the dash is the UFO, it's not leaving, it's coming in. The panoramic is taken left to right.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by tpg65

 

I see a faint dash, good eye for seeing that I must say.

So that's the proof needed then I guess?

A faint dash.

And no one saw it??

Now depending on the stitching of the images , this could easily be the ufo as it is leaving

No if the dash is the UFO, it's not leaving, it's coming in. The panoramic is taken left to right.

edit on 16/7/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)

There only seems to be a handfull of people around and then you have to take into account how long the "object" was visible . So yes , there is a good chance that nobody saw it .

Let me tell tell you what really pisses me off about people with your attitude
1: It's a good shot , so it must be fake , right ? .
2 : The image holds up under scrutiny , but nobody saw the object , so it still must be fake .


Will any amount of proof ever be good enough for people like you ?

reply to post by Chadwickus


What proof do you have that the panoramic was taken from left to right ?

If you are using the video as your source then you are way off base .
Plus , you are only assuming that nobody saw it .

Originally posted by OldHag
With the original photography you can do a lot things in the dark room, but with Photoshop you can even do more!!
I myself make a simple gif-animation with a cup and sourcher, see here:

God almighty i thought that was the real thing for a moment.
i wouldn't show that footage to many people the FBI might take you in for questioning.

I will wager the panorama was shot right to left and that the images could have been stitched between the two objects.
Take a look at the second object ( refering to the one with motion blur ) , isn't it too much of a coincidence that it is on exactly the same tilt angle as the clearer object , for them not to be the same object shot seconds apart ?

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e78b1ca8973d.png[/atsimg]

reply to post by tpg65


Easy, unless the guy in the hoody is walking backwards up the steps, it's left to right.

And I have an attitude? You're the one coming in with the attitude.

Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by tpg65

 

Easy, unless the guy in the hoody is walking backwards up the steps, it's left to right.

And I have an attitude? You're the one coming in with the attitude.

edit on 16/7/11 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)

I have passion

Ok . How do you know that the guy didn't change his mind , then turned around and went back up the stairs , so was present in the second shot ?

Too me personally it looks like the Depth Of Field is off.
Look at the carpark below the UFO.
See the slight haze on everything, also the foreground vegetation?

I would expect the UFO to have the same properties. i.e look hazier..

A lot of the 360 sites have the same "flying saucer" photoshopped in:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by tpg65


I spose this woman changed her mind too?

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/dc3cc2fe57ac.png[/atsimg]

Come on, don't let your passion blind you.

Originally posted by UKWO1Phot
Too me personally it looks like the Depth Of Field is off.
Look at the carpark below the UFO.
See the slight haze on everything, also the foreground vegetation?

I would expect the UFO to have the same properties. i.e look hazier..

Well spotted . Deffo worth a second look .

reply to post by Chadwickus


Twins ?

reply to post by tpg65


lol maybe.

reply to post by DJW001


I forgot about that one!

The plot thickens...

reply to post by Lost_Mind


It pretty much does look like this picture.
Actually, the UFO in the google earth photo looks EXACTLY like that picture.
Copy nd paste anyone?

reply to post by Gregory11




[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a2a9ecb8e6d7.jpg[/atsimg]

Buuu ..

So it looks like its an i Phone app insert.www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not

Originally posted by Mario Maisto
Hi
I report a UFO capture in a Paris panorama picture on a turistic website, here is the link:
www.paris-26-gigapixels.com...
what do you think about, real or fake?
thanks

Mario Maisto.....

You might find it of interest to refer to my recent thread:

Would The iPhone UFO App Fool Members of ATS?

The Meier UFO's & many others are available in the many iPhone UFO apps. These insertable UFO's can be varied in number, size, orientation, transparency, etc...

Here is a sample of what is available from just 1 app:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5dee8a3c2f8c.jpg[/atsimg]

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

[edit on 11-6-2010 by Maybe...maybe not]

Just compare the size of the ufo to the size of the people and buildings at the bottom of the mountain.

If it was real that thing is gigantic!

At least football field or more.

reply to post by Anoynymoose


If you take into account the depth of field, and compare it to surrounding objects, you would have to think the object was nearer than everybody thinks. But then, it would have a left a shadow on the ground and we see none.
( EDIT: Unless the shadow was hidden by the houses... )

Unless it stopped too fast for its shadow to impress the camera...

But just for the kick of it all, it could be a USO... Look just under the Cape of Good Hope title, under the pointer, and you will see a white foaming see. Its point of exit?

Originally posted by imawlinn
Cracks me up! Every single piece of evidence brought forth is immediately called photosopped or cgi. At this rate even genuine evidence will be discarded. Until people open their minds to what is possible, disclosure will never happen. Besides, unless you have seen an actual alien craft first hand, please don't comment with "it looks to good" or " looks too obvious". Those comments just make people look ignorant, imo.

If a real alien from space took pictures or video of its space ship and posted them on the Internet they would be called fake. EVERY picture and video on the Internet is FAKE by default. We will never get any "real" pictures of anything off the Internet.