It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
"Internal ATF emails seem to suggest that ATF agents were counseled to highlight a link between criminals and certain semi-automatic weapons in order to bolster a case for a rule like the one the DOJ announced yesterday [Monday]."
Townhall has obtained the email which states
"Can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same FfL and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks Mark R. Chait Assistant Director Field Operations."
Once again, liberals and the Obama Administration are focused on guns rather than criminals and federal government incomptence. Operation Fast and Furious is looking more and more like a set up from the beginning to push Obama and Holder's radical anti-Second Amendment agenda as they used law abiding gun shop owners to enable government officals to break the law, then turned around and blamed the very same gun shops for illegal gun trafficking, despite those shops being forced by ATF to help ATF agents carry out Operation Fast and Furious, and now, those shops are being punished through new Justice Department gun control measures. Obama and Holder both have long records of being outspoken opponents of gunrights and both support the reinstatement of the "assault" rifle ban, better described as a ban on semi-automatic rifles.
Originally posted by DaddyBare
Once again, liberals and the Obama Administration are focused on guns rather than criminals and federal
so you are one of those #s that thinks that obama and his ass wipers decide something
your country has been sold and bought around 100 years ago
Originally posted by kro32
They are not banning guns or anything even close to it. In fact gun owners are getting more and more court cases decided in their favor.
And how again are they exactly destroying the Constitution? I always find it funny when someone disagrees with government policy the first thing they do is yell that their Constitutional rights are being stripped away.
"Can you see if these guns were all purchased from the same FfL and at one time. We are looking at anecdotal cases to support a demand letter on long gun multiple sales. Thanks Mark R. Chait Assistant Director Field Operations."
Originally posted by kro32
They are not banning guns or anything even close to it. In fact gun owners are getting more and more court cases decided in their favor.
And how again are they exactly destroying the Constitution? I always find it funny when someone disagrees with government policy the first thing they do is yell that their Constitutional rights are being stripped away.
Originally posted by kro32
Reagan had the Iran-Contra
even FDR was supplying arms to Briton before America got into the war in that weird way he got around the law by saying it was legal to sell them if they paid cash and picked them up from America so it's not uncommon.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by kro32
Reagan had the Iran-Contra
This was a bad thing?
Guns [For people who were killing each other anyway) for hostages [Which bought their Freedom)
even FDR was supplying arms to Briton before America got into the war in that weird way he got around the law by saying it was legal to sell them if they paid cash and picked them up from America so it's not uncommon.
This was a bad thing?
Considering we all know how NAZI Germany's history played out.