1994: Army War College Paper Proposes use of Computer Generated Insurgents

Originally posted by Humint1

a 1994 strategic paper published by the U.S. Army War College titled “Revolution In Military Affairs And Conflict Short Of War,” written by Dr. Steven Metz (who works for the RAND Corporation) and James Kievit. Recent events have made this paper even more precient than ever. The document outlines an eerily familiar scenario in which a group of revolutionaries within government hijack control of the levers of power and begin a program of pre-emptive war, psychological operations at home and abroad, and false flag attacks blamed on “…computer generated insurgent leader[s]“.

In July of 1994 the U.S. Army War College Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) produced the paper titled Revolution In Military Affairs And Conflict Short Of War that uncannily forecasted the future in a “hypothetical future history” written in the year 2010. The hypothetical situation contains many disturbing predictions, several of which have come true. After a series of terrorist attacks, foreign policy “fiascos” and various disputes between “supporters of multinational peace operations” and “isolationists”, a small number of “revolutionaries” recruits members in all branches of the U.S. government and shift American foreign policy to a practice of pre-emption.

Source

This possibly may/could explain why some of the current or future terrorists noted by governments cannot be found because they only exist in cyber space or on some CD Rom in clandestine office. It also would provide reasons for leaders to seek funding citing these threats when their agendas are elsewhere.

edit on 7/14/2011 by Humint1 because: spelling error

From the end of the same very revealing article :

... U.S. strike forces also attacked neutral targets to support the psychological campaign as computer-generated insurgent leaders claimed credit for the raids. At times, even the raids themselves were computer-invented recreations.

Hello!...Am..9/11! (and so much more).

Faked Terrorists - Faked Planes - Faked Victims - Faked Footage.
Everything Faked FFS.

This is what I had come to believe (through strong evidence), before i read
the article. Well, now I am utterly convinced.
Time To Get Real.

The Western World Has Been Duped People.
'How Terrible, How Terrible', I Hear You Cry.

But Millions Of The Middle Eastern World Have Been Massacred.

Fakery Abounds

Computer Generated does not specificly mean CGI. or that the Image was computer generated.

Only that the "Terrorist" is Computer generated.

Meaning that he and everything about him was made via a computer.

His history, actions, beliefs , likes, dislikes, extreme thoughts, plans of action, EVERYTHING is simulated via a computer until they come up with a believable candidate. Then they go about Creating or making this "terrorist" real.

And since more REAL terrorists are prob not super intelligent anyways. They can then rally around a person they might not even know does not exist.


This is how they do it though. If I wrote a paper about something they wanted to use, it takes steps of action for it to happen, and in the military it takes way too long for some reason.

the paper I wrote today won't be in action for about 10 years or so...maybe 20.


It's things like this, that make more sense that what we are told.

And since our instincts are natural and more fool proof than a computer, then we should trust them. ( instincts )


I'm not so impressed that they were able to pull this off. If you have unlimited resources for like 300 years, you should be able to.

I'm more amazed that it's taken so long for " smart" / " intelligent " people to catch on to this.

They trick you by making you think you are smart just by having a degree. This way people become know it alls and think they already know everything, and thus anything beyond that, " Can't be true"

This is the kind if people we have become. Sad really

reply to post by pshea38


I bet the twin towers were fakes, too, right?

Originally posted by DrEugeneFixer
reply to post by pshea38

 

I bet the twin towers were fakes, too, right?

The twin tower were brought down demolition style, in private.
All the footage released is faked. Easily done. No big deal, technology-wise.
Are You For Real or Fake mr.fixer?

Former CIA Officials Admit To Faking Bin Laden Video
Two former CIA officials have admitted to creating a fake video in which intelligence officers dressed up as Osama Bin Laden and his cronies in an effort to defame the terrorist leader throughout the middle east.

The details are outlined in a Washington Post article by investigative reporter and former Army Intelligence case officer Jeff Stein.

www.prisonplanet.com...


First they slaps you upside the head with the playbook
then you buy it.

Originally posted by Danbones

Former CIA Officials Admit To Faking Bin Laden Video
Two former CIA officials have admitted to creating a fake video in which intelligence officers dressed up as Osama Bin Laden and his cronies in an effort to defame the terrorist leader throughout the middle east.

The details are outlined in a Washington Post article by investigative reporter and former Army Intelligence case officer Jeff Stein.

www.prisonplanet.com...


First they slaps you upside the head with the playbook
then you buy it.

I am weary of the sold-out, directed washington neaspaper source,
but these stooges are only admitting to something that is common
practice within many governments.
9/11, 7/7, Madrid and Moscow bombings etc. etc. are all Faked events,
with faked footage released to the public, who grieved for faked victims.
The OP's article states that this could have been achieved in 1994.
Nice and Tidy. Perfect.

Follow your Nose. Say no more.
That's the way to go.

Sounds like your Anonymous to me. I swear there is something up with that group. Most of what I read here on ATS, most of everybody(not all) supports them. I believe there is something totally way off with the whole "cyber war"...........I believe in the Kansas City shuffle.....rope-a-dope, or whatever you want to call it. Look over here and listen to what we have to say...While the others are over there making a back door deal of some sort.

But what do I know? I like to swim against the current....Unlike most that just float down stream with everyone else. I feel everybody is being played into thinking Anon is something they are not.

Not popular here, I know.........But this place is like every other place, the majority wins and the minority is silenced

If the insurgents are computer generated, can't our defenses also be computer generated?

This would allow us to wage the entire war on a Nintendo Wii and still have time to play Super Mario Kart after the war ends!

Here is a slide show I think people should look at. And read it to the end.
www.slideshare.net...

Then notice this picture of a complaint.




Welcome to Anon. It is the government. Yes they hire these guys to do there thing. This is a slide show at a speach given by a covert blackhat working for a company that works for New York Infragaurd who works with Department of Homeland Security. He broke the rules in the eyes of some in his line of work. So what did they do. Make him change his screen name and his secret ip address to a new one.

I edited the twitter post to hide details.

_____ since I got to maintain my new hidden identity _______ which you have bestowed on me. Your paying for my vps in the eastern block

And to let people know this type of thing goes on all the time. Here is a video about a terror specialist giving speaches for millions pushing the war on terror and he is now proven to be a fake.

www.rawstory.com...