It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Just because you don't know how to do it, doesn't mean that nobody else knows how to do it either.
Originally posted by Nikola014
But if you ask me,this look like something a human couldn't do
Yeah, just sprinkle some iron filings or other stuff at the site and people will go nuts.
Genuineness
A formation will be deemed genuine if:
1. you are not caught making it.
2. the pattern represents a shape which leading cerealogists could regard as of symbolic importance, and, therefore, useful on the proselyting lecture circuit, e.g. mandalas, Atlantean script, etc.
Any particular formation might develop its own individual folklore if:
1. it is made in a field which cerealogists later claim to have been watching.
2. light phenomena is associated with it.
3. audio phenomena is associated with it, especially in conjunction with 'd'.
4. mysterious substances are found in it - particularly if these substances are subjected to scientific analysis and found to be, 'not of this earth'.
These guys know how to press your buttons!
With such an array of scientific tools, cerealogists welcome any opportunity to use them in the field. Particularly popular are strange substances, usually found in the centre of the circles - white goo, for instance, or dew-rusted iron filings (meteoric dust)... or anything glowing or luminous - will quickly attract a flurry of interest.
The science is such a joke it's unbelievable:
Scientific analysis
In their attempts to create a universal acceptance of the crop circles' paranormal origins, leading cerealogists often pretend a relationship with orthodox science. Such phrases as "we are working closely with scientists" or, "we are awaiting the results of analysis" are commonly used in press releases, for instance, or on the lecture circuit. As well as the possibility that this might fool gullible, provincial journalists who aren't particularly bothered if they parrot rubbish to their readership, this provides a certain security amongst the rank & file researchers, who, when pressed, will cite the need for only one circle to be proved to be 'of unknown origin', thereby justifying their pursuance of the phenomenon - an apparently heroic search for the elusive, hypothetical, white crow. In regard to this, Rupert Sheldrake can be forgiven for his sincere, fleeting, interest in the subject.
The others are too ridiculous to mention? So is that one!
The September issue of the Journal for Scientific Exploration included the CCCS's latest method of determining 'hoaxed' from 'genuine' circles: "Take two cereal heads from the centre of the formation and another two well outside (100 metres) within the same field. Lay them on the bonnet of your car and think 'AURA' and dowse them. If there is a difference between the two heads, we are dealing with a genuine formation. (Chairman Michael Green, CCCS Procedures for the 1995 Season - as reported by Dr W C Levengood). All of these methods of detection, and myriad others too ridiculous to mention, provide us with evidence of something or another.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Nikola014
All I have to ask is...
How come the intricacy of crop circles has increased at the same rate as GPS technology?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Nikola014
Then tell me,how much time does it take to create a crop circle at the night?
And how no one noticed them?
Originally posted by Nikola014
Or it's because the 2012 is close?
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Nikola014
Then tell me,how much time does it take to create a crop circle at the night?
I don't know I never asked them.. but I have watched demos and they do it very fast with the right team
And how no one noticed them?
Because no one is looking for them. Crop circles are big business and they ALL want to keep the mystery alive. If someone was REALLY looking they would set up high tech cameras in the hots spots. No one is doing that.
Originally posted by Nikola014
I'm asking because,when my friends and i were trying to make a simple crop circle at the night,we finish it for like eight hours...
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Nikola014
I'm asking because,when my friends and i were trying to make a simple crop circle at the night,we finish it for like eight hours...
Not bad for a first one... And the original ones were just simple circles on the ground. They got better as the years went on and they mastered the skills. You don't become an expert overnight
The funny thing is that when there is a sloppy circle found, the Alien believers will say THOSE are man made because they are not perfect... while the good ones MUST be Alien because man could never do anything like that.
No the bad ones are merely beginners
Originally posted by Nikola014
,im only saying that we don't know who makes them..
Originally posted by dethduck
This, like all things in society, has long since been split into divisible camps of "Us and Them" where we are meant to occupy ourselves and our attention by pointing fingers and arguing with each other.
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
lol those are obviously fakes
part of the disinfo agenda/cover-up
I believe crop circles are created by planetary elementals of the air called "Sylphs".
I heard about "Powers of the Air" as far back as 1970. I saw a female Sylph above West Vancouver in 1972. In 1984 I bought Trevor James Constable's book on infrared photography of Sylphs in which they have amoeba-like heat signatures on the specially prepared photographic plates.
Constable wrote that the USAF as far back as 1960 set up microwave defenses against Sylphs who they blamed for gremlins in aircraft and psychic disturbances against pilots.
In Colorado, high speed low light video cameras show activity above thunderstorms during lightning strikes. Flashes move high into the stratosphere. The rapid movements of electricity and light are called Elfs and Sprites, appropriately they should be called Sylphs
"there are more things between heaven and earth..."