Global warming debunked in 4 words

The sun drives climate.

The rothchilds are trying to tax a natural gas that has ALWAYS existed.

The carbon tax is a tax on breathing, they are charging you for the oxygen you breathed and turned into carbon dioxide by claming its killing the planet even though plants breath it and the ocean absorbs more carbon per day then the whole human race could use.

STARTING A NEW THREAD
AboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count.
Please do not create minimal posts to start your new thread.
If you feel inclined to make the board aware of news, current events,
or important information from other sites;
*please post one or two paragraphs,
*a link to the entire story,
*AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item,
as a means to inspire discussion or collaborative research on your subject.

The words I was looking for was: Scam, doesn't really exist.

So I am wondering why you posted this? Every one all ready knows.

Sun dictates earths activities
4 words

reply to post by NTMofficial


Creative Taxation Without Representation................Comes to Mind..........

There's
No
Such
Thing

I was thinking 5 words

Disaster equals profit and control.

so sad

wanna know the fun part ?

the sun is actually currently in a weak or low cycle linky

should be fun when it starts to heat up !

see kids, with all the greenhouse gasses in the air, we are seeing undeniable warming on this planet AND THE SUN IS IN A WEAK CYCLE !!!!!

deny ignorance indeed

and anyone who thinks it is a scam, please look into Prof. Mullers testimony before congress, and explain how it is relevant to the taxes and political discussion. it you can't do that, please don't waste my time by replying to this


and while everyone knows about the carbon issue, methane remains a much more potent greenhouse gas, and it is never discussed, yet it seeps out of every landfill on the planet 24/7/365.

That doesn't mean it doesn't exist. that means to you, man made global warming doesn't exist.

mine were "A load of crap."

2nd

reply to post by syrinx high priest


The greatest source/ producer of methane is cow farts.
Co2 is required for plants to thrive.
Perhaps these "greenhouse" gasses are not so sinister?

Originally posted by randomtangentsrme
reply to post by syrinx high priest

 

The greatest source of methane is cow farts.

I hope that was a poor attempt at humor and not your level of knowledge on the issue

Human-influenced sources of methane include landfills, natural gas and petroleum production and distribution systems, agricultural activities, coal mining, stationary and mobile combustion, wastewater treatment, and certain industrial processes. About 60% of global methane emissions come from these sources and the rest are from natural sources (IPCC, 2001). Natural sources include wetlands, termites, oceans, and hydrates (which consist of methane molecules each surrounded by a cage of water molecules and are present in seafloor deposits around the world).

reply to post by syrinx high priest


Here's my sources for the single largest producer. Where's yours?
www.epa.gov...
www.riverdeep.net...
www.funtrivia.com...

reply to post by randomtangentsrme


next time you edit your post, do better

the issue with CO2, of course, is the bath tub theory. you do know that one, right ?

I guess you're falling behind and need to study more... The issue is Not global warming, it is climate change, and if man is contributing enough to mess up a very "delicate" balance.

Regardless any outcome e.g. a warming , ice age.

Scientists from Australia think the data points irrefutable to man. Look at there conclusions here :

Brave new climate

Originally posted by randomtangentsrme
reply to post by syrinx high priest

 

Here's my sources for the single largest producer. Where's yours?
www.epa.gov...
www.riverdeep.net...
www.funtrivia.com...

fun trivia ? I don't know why I bother but here goes

some group of nefarious jewish bankers who live to tax people also known as climate scientists

CCSP

the fact remains humans produce more methan than ALL natural sources. get your head out of the cows butts long enough and you'll see the light !!!

reply to post by syrinx high priest


Sir, I have tried listening to you. You have reverted to less than cordial conversation. I have given you 3 links within one or two pages of a Google search offering cow methane production at 20% of the total global production. You have given me a link stating 10 different industrial processes that make up 60% (average 6% per unit).
We may well not be disagreeing but on semantics. But the devils in the details. And the detail is Cows and livestock make up the greatest source of methane.
No I do not know the bath tub theory of climate change. I'm familiar with the economic model.

I agree..in part. I believe human kind is speeding up the natural cycle of the earths climate but we are not the root cause. I think we are near the tail end of an interglacial period. It will get a lot warmer then......probably some kind of cataclysm (super volcano, solar flare, asteroid....take your pick) and then bam....things get a lot colder. We probably wont see it in our lifetimes but the cycles repeat themselves......... things going great, proceed to get a lot worse, mass extinction, ice age...life recovers......and repeat.


Heres a pretty good link
ice ages

IMHO global warming is a scam. The Earth is undergoing huge changes which are mostly influenced by the sun....as are the other planets. All humans are doing is speeding up the natural process.

Its funny to hear the term "global warming" seeing that this last winter has been one of the coldest on record in many places and so far the summer......at least here in Vancouver, hasn't reached its standard temperature highs.

Originally posted by randomtangentsrme

Co2 is required for plants to thrive.
Perhaps these "greenhouse" gasses are not so sinister?

edit on 10-7-2011 by randomtangentsrme because: added more

Water is required for your body to live.

So I guess any amount dumped down your gullet would help you thrive, right?

reply to post by incrediblelousminds


No. But any amount surrounding my body (not my head) would not harm me. In fact my body would absorb an excess of water. However water on this planet is not the atmosphere, although it makes up a part of it.
I do not breathe water. Humans breathe oxygen and give off carbon dioxide. Plants take in Co2 and expel oxygen.
Perhaps a solution to the increase of Co2 is simply allow more plant life.
To paraphrase Tom Stoppard, "Foul. No non sequiturs." I fail to see what poring water in my lungs has to do with the scientific allegations of climate change.