reply to post by Tib50
The “Tree of Life” represents the allegoric code which has been widely employed by various groups (or perhaps a single group with a multitude of
covers) for thousands of years. Not every movie script writer is in on this secret code and as a result they may insert the Tree of Life where it
does not correctly belong, but if a code also plays a major role in the movie, then the author is likely to have at least some knowledge of the code.
(Naturally, the code can only be presented in abstract form when it is discussed in a movie. In the low budget thriller, “The Code Conspiracy“,
the “Torah Code” was used as a cover, but when the characters in the movie explained how it worked, and how it looked “organic”, they were
actually describing this allegoric code.) When those that have knowledge of this code offer a public explanation of any part of it, they do it
almost entirely through the use of metaphors and symbols. A single real world idea can have dozens of metaphors used to represent it. (Kabbalists
admit to having more than a hundred names for “G-d“, but claim that it is wrong to correctly pronounce his true name. ) This is why various
authors of allegoric works seem to have different opinions as to what a symbol or metaphor actually represents. Even if there is agreement among
these authors, they still are able to hide their true meaning. For example, there is literal agreement that the “white dove” is a symbol for
“peace”, but no one has told the masses what “peace” represents?
If a religion is “dualistic” it is because it is descriptive of this allegory. The “good” represents deception which is “white” and is
associated with the literal meaning of the allegory, while the “evil” and “black” represents hidden meanings. “Life” also represents the
literal world and “eternal life” is gained when a person’s existence is recorded in the literal portion of an allegoric work.
Real knowledge is “male” while knowledge that is used for “cover” is “female“ (i.e. Blond, Brunette, Redhead). Real knowledge is often
openly presented to the literal world, but it is placed in a false context which prevents the reader (or movie viewer) from truly understanding the
subject that is being discussed. For example, I found Plato’s
Cratylus (which is a dialogue about the “correctness” of names) to be
extremely useful in my understanding of this allegory, but modern scholars dismiss it as “satire”. (Of course, a small number of these scholars
know exactly what
Cratylus and they will naturally go out of their way to prevent any speculation that might attempt to associate
Cratylus with a “cratalis“.) The philosophy of the ancient Greeks consists almost entirely of discussions of allegoric concepts and the
“cover” is often relatively thin, so they at times appeared to embrace homosexuality as an admission of their interest in non-female concepts.
The Tree of Life is often presented with its “roots” showing and these roots represent hidden meanings. The Tree of Life is also said to be made
of the 10 Sefirot. You can think of these Sefirot as something akin to a Dewey Decimal System with each Sefirah representing a different type of
writing (i.e. religion, history, philosophy, etc.) Allegory is a rather imprecise means of communication and this is probably why so many metaphors
have to be employed in the description of various types of writings. The 11th Sefirah, Da‘at, which is sometimes included with the other 10,
represents allegoric knowledge that is transmitted only orally to initiates. This oral knowledge would consist of the real meanings for key
metaphors. Obviously, it is rather difficult to remember alternate meanings for every word in a given language and therefore, a majority of metaphors
are also openly defined in relation to other metaphors, so if you know the real meaning of one metaphor, you can then extrapolate the meanings of
other metaphors. However, these definitions are scattered in a wide variety of writings and therefore a good deal of effort might need to be expended
in order to find the correct meaning to an obscure metaphor. A few have attempted to overcome this difficulty by creating a “Philosopher’s
Stone” which is basically a metaphoric thesaurus. (Alchemists described writings as types of “metals” and the Philosopher’s Stone could be
employed to change one type of writing into another.)