It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Utopian
We have all seen the multitude of youtube vids plotting ELEnin's orbital path around the sun. Well i am confused as to how Nasa have been able to calculate the turning point if they still do not have any idea of the size and mass of the comet.
Maybe someone out there could enlighten me!
Phage are you around ?
Originally posted by OMsk3ptic
So now Elenin is supposedly Nibiru? Then what is that comet that we have all seen pictures of? It certainly doesn't fit the description that your post gives about the "mystery heavenly body." Elenin is nothing more than a comet. Nibiru, if it exists, is something completely different.edit on 9-7-2011 by OMsk3ptic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
When the "elites" start running around nekkid and drinking and crying and swearing and freaking out. . . .
THEN, I'll worry.
Until then? A nice cuppa and a smoke will do me just fine.
Might I suggest the same?
Originally posted by MACchine
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by MACchine
IRAS was the satellite that discovered Nibiru in Dec of 1983 ...
This has been done to death on ATS and elsewhere on the internet also.
After more observations it was found to be something normal, further away, not Nibiru or any other death star.
False alarm.
Go do more research.
I bet this is the FIRST thread that actually included the articles, before you would just say they did not exist.
Why should I believe YOU or if it is true their corrections, you did not give me a source.
You obviously DO NOT READ VERY WELL since I STATED THIS, JUST A BEGINNER I SEE, go back and read it AGAIN.
Keep reading it until you GET IT !!!
Although these IRAS observations were seeing mysterious objects, at this stage, there was no indication that there was an object (let alone a brown dwarf) powering its way toward us. But the rumours had already begun to flow. When follow-up papers were published in 1985 (Unidentified IRAS sources – Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., 1985) and 1987 (The IRAS View of the Extragalactic Sky, Soifer et al., 1987), there was little if any media interest in their findings. According to these publications, most of the IRAS observations in the 1984 paper were distant, ultra-luminous young galaxies and one was a filamentary structure known as “infrared cirrus” floating in intergalactic space. IRAS never observed any astronomical body in the outer reaches of the Solar System.
it HAS NEVER BEEN SEEN by optical telescopes
Better to find out everyone's going to die in a few days than a few years when you know nothing can be done about such a situation as Planetary collision.