It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
were the result of a set-up. What we are seeing is a manipulation by the big powers; this terrorism would not exist without them. He affirms that, instead of faking a "world war on terror", the best way to reduce that kind of attacks is through respect for international law and peaceful cooperation among countries and their citizens.
General Leonid Ivashov was the Chief of Staff of the Russian armed forces when the September 11, 2001, attacks took place. This military man, who lived the events from the inside, offers an analysis which is very different to that of his American colleagues.
Osama bin Laden and "Al Qaeda" cannot be the organizers nor the performers of the September 11 attacks. They do not have the necessary organization, resources or leaders.
The use of the term "international terrorism" has the following goals:
Hiding the real objectives of the forces deployed all over the world in the struggle for dominance and control;
Turning the people's demands to a struggle of undefined goals against an invisible enemy;
Destroying basic international norms and changing concepts such as: aggression, state terror, dictatorship or movement of national liberation;
Depriving peoples of their legitimate right to fight against aggressions and to reject the work of foreign intelligence services;
Terrorism is the weapon used in a new type of war. At the same time, international terrorism, in complicity with the media, becomes the manager of global processes. It is precisely the symbiosis between media and terror, which allows modifying international politics and the exiting reality.
Originally posted by etombo
A Russian military official said something? Was this before or after he lost a million AK-47's somehow? The problem with someone like this is he is an opposing power, you must be skeptical of anything he says before he even thinks about speaking.
Originally posted by etombo
A Russian military official said something? Was this before or after he lost a million AK-47's somehow? The problem with someone like this is he is an opposing power, you must be skeptical of anything he says before he even thinks about speaking.
It is obvious again that he would be so critical of Osama Bin Laden because those Afghani's beat those Russian's down. Is it unreasonable to assume that his person is bias to begin with?edit on 8-7-2011 by etombo because: adding.
Originally posted by yourmamaknows
reply to post by torontoguy123
9-11 is still from the time you should believe what you were told. But there is a new time now.
With the cross checking of computers, there is less of this bologna.
Originally posted by hooper
Originally posted by yourmamaknows
reply to post by torontoguy123
9-11 is still from the time you should believe what you were told. But there is a new time now.
With the cross checking of computers, there is less of this bologna.
Yes, know you can believe whatever you want! And you can go on the internet and find whatever you want to support whatever you want to believe! Its just wonderful - you want to believe nobody died on 9/11? There's a website for that. You want to believe that the planes everyone saw crash into the buildings were in fact holograms? - there's a website for that. You want to believe that secret government ninja gnomes snuck into the World Trade Center and painted the steel with super duper nano thermite? - you can find more than a few sites that'll support that little gem. No plane crashed at Shanksville? - no problem, there's a couple of folks out there more than willing to lead you down that thorny path.
Before you start cross checking all the computers maybe you start and cross check all the conspiracy fantasies.
Before you start cross checking all the computers maybe you start and cross check all the conspiracy fantasies.
The NIST couldn't do that in 10,000 pages.
I did and started with the offical story.
Having a understanding of physics tends to help but hey if you beleive all the crap from the media then keep on.
In the overall flow of information coming from the Middle East, there are increasingly frequent reports indicating that within several months from now the US will deliver nuclear strikes on Iran. For example, citing well-informed but undisclosed sources, the Kuwaiti Arab Times wrote that the US plans to launch a missile and bomb attack on the territory of Iran before the end of April, 2007. The campaign will start from the sea and will be supported by the Patriot missile defense systems in order to let the US forces avoid a ground operation and to reduce the efficiency of the return strike by “any Persian Gulf country”.
Originally posted by hooper
Glad you think that you have an "understanding" of physics. Unfortunately it takes a lot more than that to understand a complex event like a massive building collapse.
Glad you think that you have an "understanding" of physics. Unfortunately it takes a lot more than that to understand a complex event like a massive building collapse.