It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

OMG, I never noticed this in my picture till I blew it up. Check it out.

page: 1
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:43 PM
link   
I was going through the photos of this bad storm that came in and never noticed this object in the sky at all, when taking this picture. There were no planes around when I took this picture. It so does not look like a Chinese lantern, I would of noticed the bright light. I did not see this until I opened the picture up. What do you think it is? How do I send it to someone to view this as full capacity. HAHA... Actually cool that I got something...
Enjoy.




edit on 7-7-2011 by Manhater because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:44 PM
link   
Looks like a lens flare buddy. Sorry. Google them, they come in a ll shapes and sizes.

Good trying and make sure to keep your eyes open.

Pred...



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:45 PM
link   
reply to post by Manhater
 


where abouts was this picture taken exactly?



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:47 PM
link   
Wow another picture of a bright light in the sky.

I think you've found the smoking gun there.



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:49 PM
link   
reply to post by kro32
 


Dont have to be such a smart ass about it



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:52 PM
link   
Not a lens flare, none the other pictures have it. Nice try though .

edit on 7-7-2011 by Manhater because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by predator0187
Looks like a lens flare buddy. Sorry. Google them, they come in a ll shapes and sizes.

Good trying and make sure to keep your eyes open.

Pred...


Lens flare require something to make it flare. There is no light source there in front of the camera to make one.

That being said, might it have been a water droplet on the lens?



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by SubPop79

Originally posted by predator0187
Looks like a lens flare buddy. Sorry. Google them, they come in a ll shapes and sizes.

Good trying and make sure to keep your eyes open.

Pred...


Lens flare require something to make it flare. There is no light source there in front of the camera to make one.

That being said, might it have been a water droplet on the lens?


was no drizzling or rain, when I took it, it was just clouds.
edit on 7-7-2011 by Manhater because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:54 PM
link   
reply to post by predator0187
 





Looks like a lens flare buddy.


I think your right....on the right side of the top photo you can see another nice round glare also (in the open space where no clouds are hanging out)...and the close up really does look like just lens flare.

I can imagine it was quite the shock when you saw it though OP...it is interesting.

Keep hunting though...there is the picture that is not going to be explainable out there I am sure!

Edit: Actually there must have been some mostiure in the air...at least it would appear so here:






edit on 7-7-2011 by jerryznv because: ...



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:54 PM
link   
reply to post by predator0187
 


Not lens flare, sorry but having a back ground in real cameras and digital there would be multiple exact images with varying color in the pic. But its truly looks like a lost balloon. Its tangible, it has mass, and its obviously floating.



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Manhater
Not a lens flare, none the other pictures have it. Nice try though .

edit on 7-7-2011 by Manhater because: (no reason given)


Was your camera on a tripod? If not then a tiny shift in angle will change the flare. If on a tripod and the object is only there for one photo that also rules out a water droplet?

What camera? And if applicable what lens?

Thanks.

Pred...



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by predator0187

Originally posted by Manhater
Not a lens flare, none the other pictures have it. Nice try though .

edit on 7-7-2011 by Manhater because: (no reason given)


Was your camera on a tripod? If not then a tiny shift in angle will change the flare. If on a tripod and the object is only there for one photo that also rules out a water droplet?

What camera? And if applicable what lens?

Thanks.

Pred...


It's a crappy sony. That was not on a tripod. I took a snapshot just before we had lightening
And it was taken in NC.



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 10:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by CarpeLibertas
reply to post by predator0187
 


Not lens flare, sorry but having a back ground in real cameras and digital there would be multiple exact images with varying color in the pic. But its truly looks like a lost balloon. Its tangible, it has mass, and its obviously floating.


Why is obviously floating? I ask because I'm not seeing it.

Multiple images if he was not on a tripod? Doubtful, No one can hold their hands that steady.

Pred...



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 11:01 PM
link   
Most lens flare happen with a light source in the pic or at least immediately out of the shot. Or a highly illuminated reflection off of something in the short from a source behind the camera.
edit on 7-7-2011 by CarpeLibertas because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 11:10 PM
link   
It looks dark outside.
If your camera (as many cameras do) automatically uses flash when light levels fall, then it might just be a bit of dust, pollen, insect, whatever caught by the glare of the flash.

Edit - from the EXIF data you posted...
Flash = Flash fired, auto mode, return light not detected

So its probably some tiny particle caught in the flash. Just like all those "orbs" in ghost hunter photos.


edit on 7-7-2011 by alfa1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 11:13 PM
link   
I like my UFO version and I'm sticking to it.



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 11:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by CarpeLibertas
reply to post by predator0187
 


Not lens flare, sorry but having a back ground in real cameras and digital there would be multiple exact images with varying color in the pic. But its truly looks like a lost balloon. Its tangible, it has mass, and its obviously floating.


Right. It is definitely not a lens flare. But I doubt it is a balloon. Seeing as there is no lens flare, meaning no bright light source, and because the photo is in a low light setting and low resolution, I don't think a balloon, even one that would be that close to be that big, would be that bright.

Probably just dust...or a UFO


I'm JK. Even a brightly illuminated UFO probably wouldn't appear that uniformly bright with such low light and the level of zoom.
edit on 7-7-2011 by SubPop79 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 11:16 PM
link   
Looks like a balloon in the first picture.
Second is blurred.cant make it out
interesting though..as balloons are generally not completely round



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 11:22 PM
link   
reply to post by kro32
 


Haha ;-)

Off: You got almost 10 times the amount of posts that I do in the SAME amout of time. Do you just talk more, or do I just read more?


On: Looks cool. Who knows "really" what they are? Figuring out the unknown can prove to be a challenging task. Keep it up!

Peace...



posted on Jul, 7 2011 @ 11:25 PM
link   
For those who would want it...
EXIF DATA
 

[Image]
Image Description =
Make = SONY
Model = DSC-W120
Orientation = top/left
Y Resolution = 72
Resolution Unit = inch
Date Time = 2011-07-04 19:41:16
YCbCr Positioning = co-sited
Exif IFD Pointer = Offset: 258
PrintIM Data = 28 Byte

[Camera]
Exposure Time = 1/40"
F Number = F2.8
Exposure Program = Normal program
ISO Speed Ratings = 400
Exif Version = Version 2.21
Date Time Original = 2011-07-04 19:41:16
Date Time Digitized = 2011-07-04 19:41:16
Components Configuration = YCbcr
Compressed Bits Per Pixel = 4
Exposure Bias Value = ±0EV
Max Aperture Value = F2.83
Metering Mode = Pattern
Light Source = unknown
Flash = Flash fired, auto mode, return light not detected
Focal Length = 5.35mm
Maker Note = 8508 Byte
Flashpix Version = Version 1.0
Color Space = sRGB
Exif Image Width = 3072
Exif Image Height = 2304
Interoperability IFD Pointer = Offset: 9220
File Source = DSC
Scene Type = A directly photographed image
Custom Rendered = Normal process
Exposure Mode = Auto exposure
White Balance = Auto white balance
Scene Capture Type = Normal
Contrast = Normal
Saturation = Normal
Sharpness = Normal

[Interoperability]
Interoperability Index = ExifR98
Interoperability Version = Version 1.0

[Thumbnail Info]
Compression = JPEG Compressed (Thumbnail)
Make = SONY
Model = DSC-W120
Orientation = top/left
Y Resolution = 72
Resolution Unit = inch
Date Time = 2011-07-04 19:41:16
JPEG Interchange Format = Offset: 9428
JPEG Interchange Format Length = Length: 5528

[Thumbnail]
Thumbnail = 160 x 120

[MakerNote (Sony)]
1000 = 0
1001 = 0
1002 = 0
2000 = 00
9001 = 70,
edit on July 7th 2011 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join