Anon (not) Exposed - [HOAX]

I agree with SkepticOverlord, and was about to say the same thing. This entire topic is based on a faulty premise.

I own several websites, and according to ICANN, having fake registration data is not allowed and they can suspend your domain name if they find out the information is incorrect. Since many people like myself don't want to put their personal information on the internet, and anyone can do a "Whois" (like the OP) and find out information about the owner of said domain, I agreed to pay extra for "Private Registration". "Private registration" is just a "middle man" that links public contact info to my private contact info so nobody can see my private info, only public info provided by the company.

I use GoDaddy when I buy domains, and their Private Registration service is known as Domains by Proxy. I don't even know what you would find if you researched the contact information of some of my domains, but I do know it will only point to a place that has no relationship to me except that they forward all contacts to me.

So this topic is.... lacking a solid foundation. To me it is obvious the OP has never had to buy a domain name before.

Originally posted by boondock-saint
just FYI, guess who is a strategic partner with Drapkin technology?
Akami and AT&T

Akami services a very large number of high-bandwidth Internet customers.

I'm surprised you're still chasing this errant path. Nothing after the private domain registration service is in any way able connected to the original target, because the service is nothing more than a middle-man holder of personal info.

The entire premise is flawed. Seriously.

reply to post by boondock-saint


I told you all this longtime ago but nnnooo nobody listen to me

Any minute now we'll have a link to Obama's birth certificate alongside a picture of Syrian mercenaries with make believe tattoos and all interrelated to Soros! This poster has history in clutching at straws and I hope he reads and understands what SkepticOverlord is saying. I guarantee that Boon will come back in a post or two to say that he was wrong. Only assuming he hasn't met a member of the illuminati and wants to be his voice on ATS!

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord

Originally posted by boondock-saint
just FYI, guess who is a strategic partner with Drapkin technology?
Akami and AT&T

Akami services a very large number of high-bandwidth Internet customers.

I'm surprised you're still chasing this errant path. Nothing after the private domain registration service is in any way able connected to the original target, because the service is nothing more than a middle-man holder of personal info.

The entire premise is flawed. Seriously.

Does ATS use Akami services ???

and

I have yet to see any evidence that the privacy company
in question randomly generates user names for their
privacy accounts. They will not even post a terms of service
on their web site.

Also, there is an ATS member I am in contact with via u2u
that states he is from that area of Nova Scotia and is familiar
with that PO Box and says it is a military box. He will not go
on record cuz he wants to remain anon, but he claims to have
details of the owner of that box. That Post Office is just outside
of a Military Base.

So if it is true what he says that the military picks up the
mail from that box, what does it say about the validity of
this thread ???

Originally posted by boondock-saint
I have yet to see any evidence that the privacy company in question randomly generates user names for their
privacy accounts. They will not even post a terms of service on their web site.

The Whois Privacy Protect service is in compliance with all ICANN policies regarding the proper storage and display of information in the Whois database. ICANN requires every registrar or organization that offers domain name registration services to have contact information for each domain registered on its platform. Whois Privacy Protect stores the contact information in a private database for each Whois record.

www.whoisprivacyprotect.com...
How else would they do it?

Also, there is an ATS member I am in contact with via u2u that states he is from that area of Nova Scotia and is familiar with that PO Box and says it is a military box.

Google Search: "PO Box 841" "Yarmouth, NS B5A 4K5"
A great many companies using that same address as the contact for their private domain registration.

He will not go on record cuz he wants to remain anon, but he claims to have details of the owner of that box. That Post Office is just outside of a Military Base.

G oogle Maps
Where's the base?

Here it is, about 1 hour away from Yarmouth if you get driving directions. It's Canadian Forces Station, Barrington

Canadian Forces Station Barrington, also referred to as CFS Barrington, was a Canadian Forces Station located in the unincorporated community of Baccaro, Nova Scotia at Baccaro Point near the southwestern-most point of the province.

Even so, the prior Google search proves that hundreds of companies are using Whois Privacy Protect, and that very same Canadian Post box.

Originally posted by gabbermatt
reply to post by boondock-saint

 

I do believe the e-mails are randomly generated for whois privacy.... I can't speak for all companies but I know the hosting company I work for that resells through enom (for now) uses randomly generated whois e-mails when customers want privacy....

some of you people.... *sigh*

do the military pick up the mail from
the PO Box for those privacy agencies
as well ???

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Where's the base?

he never said the base was above ground
to be able to view it on a map.

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
A great many companies using that same address as the contact for their private domain registration.

thanks Skeptic, you just provided another
clue in the puzzle.

What companies would use this same
privacy protection service knowing them
to be a front??

I wonder if there is a connection
between them.

Off to do more research

Its not just fss34.com that has domain privacy setttings, have a look at http:///pLwhf5GY (results from three whois queries) and you will notice all three of them use a similar service. For those too lazy to click or otherwise unwilling the three sites I ran through the whois system were 4chan.org, infowars.com and davidicke.com All three came back with privatized address consisting of random numbers and letters. These random addresses have no direct link to any secret government operation, the only possible connection would be if you could determine where the emails re-direct to but other than that the "trail" is as cold as a penguins tail in winter.

I offer the following quote as food for thought in this thread, maybe it will help restore a semblance of balance:

When your mind becomes obsessed with anything, you will filter everything else out and find that thing everywhere.

note: if you are interested in that quote check out the movie Pi on IMDB, that is where its from.

It's too much to be weary of in today's world. I just mind my business and will try and change the world with what I do know. I don't tell anybody my plans anywhere, because I don't know who they know and it could be counterproductive. It's slow but I'm the only one that trusts me enough to pull this off.

Anonymous has too much space to be successful anyways. They are recruiting people who don't even know how to become anonymous on the net to do anything. The way I see anonymous is that they decide to start the "anonymous trend" and have people say they are anonymous, when in reality they are not, while the people behind the scenes are REALLY anonymous and having innocent people targeted, picked off, and being thrown in jail just because they want to be anonymous.

Basically, Anonymous is using their followers as shields instead of actual weapons. Depending how you look at it, it could be called a sacrifice, or a set-up. We won't know until anonymous has won or lost huh?

Trust no one. Get up and do something on your own. Not just research all the time. Go train in a martial art or weaponry in case things get bad so you can defend yourself at least. Have your own plan, cause yours might be the one that actually works. That's all there is to it.

Please don't post the personal information of private individuals. That's a serious T&C violation.

Originally posted by mb2591

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by dario86
Anonymous does not represent one man or corporation.
There's no clear structure or leadership in Anonymous.

my theory and evidence provided
might prove you wrong

this is what you find when you
follow the money AND motive.

Actually if your theory was right I'm pretty sure they would doing hacks with skill... not by using programs and google dorking, ddos's, and sqli

Either way though this ends in revolution

Don't be so sure about that. Remember the Cash for Clunkers fiasco where they literally exposed their agenda for claiming people's data by having them click a link? It was both smart and dumb, and people caught on. But now they have that Schmidt guy from ISSA running cybersecurity for them.

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Please don't post the personal information of private individuals. That's a serious T&C violation.

okie dokie
my apologies sir

just following leads
in an investigation

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
A great many companies using that same address as the contact for their private domain registration.

thanks Skeptic, you just provided another
clue in the puzzle.

What companies would use this same
privacy protection service knowing them
to be a front??

I wonder if there is a connection
between them.

Off to do more research

Where have you come up with the idea that this privacy protection service is a front?

Skeptic is right you are off the beaten path with this.

reply to post by CodexSinaiticus

Holy cow, you did all this research, omg, remind me not to piss you off!

how amazing, using google and searching infos is so difficult to do

Seriously, nones of you ever used a simple WHOIS tool or what ?

reply to post by Agape

" We are legion, we are many."

we use in the meaning of "legions" for our number, assembled likes "legions" "centurions" and decurions"

Before claiming we're anti christ, try to educate yourself first...

Well I'm only a newbie here so nothing I say really carries any weight however, I would just like to say to boondock-saint that your research is quite amazing! I I'm not sure I believe Anonymous has ties to the Govt (or maybe I just dont want to believe it!), but you present some very interesting theories here.

For that, I thank you.

Originally posted by boondock-saint
just following leads in an investigation

No. You're chasing wild geese into neverland.