It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
I guess the OP doesn't really know
that his Op actually needs some content.
a clickable link would be nice as well
Originally posted by smuarb
Originally posted by boondock-saint
I guess the OP doesn't really know
that his Op actually needs some content.
a clickable link would be nice as well
sorry..this is my first post. I made the link clickable
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
reply to post by crimvelvet
With that said, I'd love to see the full story. This guy must have done something, you would think, to REALLY piss this judge off.
In large part, the bankruptcy court’s concern regarding the GSA arose from what the court termed Baron’s “Cavalcade of Attorneys.” Throughout the bankruptcy proceedings, Baron “has continued to hire and fire lawyers” and has instructed these lawyers to file pleadings against matters resolved by the agreement. The court also expressed concern that such constant turn-over in the “dozens of sets of lawyers” hired by Baron has generated “significant fees . . . to a level that is more than a little disturbing.” The court noted that this behavior “smacks of the possibility of violating Rule 11” or, “more troubling,” the possibility that “Baron may be engaging in the crime of theft of services.”
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
reply to post by crimvelvet
With that said, I'd love to see the full story. This guy must have done something, you would think, to REALLY piss this judge off.
Here's part of it
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
reply to post by crimvelvet
With that said, I'd love to see the full story. This guy must have done something, you would think, to REALLY piss this judge off.
Here's part of it
In large part, the bankruptcy court’s concern regarding the GSA arose from what the court termed Baron’s “Cavalcade of Attorneys.” Throughout the bankruptcy proceedings, Baron “has continued to hire and fire lawyers” and has instructed these lawyers to file pleadings against matters resolved by the agreement. The court also expressed concern that such constant turn-over in the “dozens of sets of lawyers” hired by Baron has generated “significant fees . . . to a level that is more than a little disturbing.” The court noted that this behavior “smacks of the possibility of violating Rule 11” or, “more troubling,” the possibility that “Baron may be engaging in the crime of theft of services.”
More: www.karlbayer.com...
Originally posted by smuarb
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
reply to post by crimvelvet
With that said, I'd love to see the full story. This guy must have done something, you would think, to REALLY piss this judge off.
Here's part of it
Interesting that the Judge -Royal Furgeson and the Receiver, Peter Vogel are both bloggers on that blog site you posted (both have their own expert page)
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Originally posted by smuarb
Originally posted by Pauligirl
Originally posted by Ryanp5555
reply to post by crimvelvet
With that said, I'd love to see the full story. This guy must have done something, you would think, to REALLY piss this judge off.
Here's part of it
Interesting that the Judge -Royal Furgeson and the Receiver, Peter Vogel are both bloggers on that blog site you posted (both have their own expert page)
That is interesting. So is the Appeal of Order--shows 18 attorneys terminated by Baron and Ondova Limited Company. In truth, this case has too many parties in it for me to really figure out what's going on without going to PACER and reading the documents from the beginning.