posted on Jul, 3 2011 @ 03:09 PM
I'll tell you straight up, I dislike all TV news. I stopped watching maybe 7 or 8 years ago when I realized the Internet was about 84 octillion times
better as an information source. So when I see any of these clowns, from Beck to Larry King to Wolf Blitzer to whoever, they all come across as kind
of seedy carnival barkers who play on emotions. For example, look at the video posted in this thread above, which contains both Beck and some other
guy who is criticizing him. They seem like mirror images of each other, at least in terms of the way they communicate. They both drop heavy
insinuations like carpet bombs: trailing off in the middle of a sentence and looking meaningfully into the camera, emphasizing certain words
verbally, etc. Its an intellectually dishonest way to communicate because it obviates logic. You are relieved of the burden of actually having to
think through the positions because you can ride on the coattails of these little insinuations and emotionally manipulative techniques, and the
speaker just takes your thought process to whatever conclusion he is aiming for. Its a terrible way to think, a terrible way to present "news" or
any other serious information for that matter, and I roundly condemn it. From my perspective, thus, Beck is neither better or worse than any of the
others, all of whom are serving to coarsen the already-coarse thread of public discourse.