It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Several measures have been introduced in Congress, including a joint resolution by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., and Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, which proposes a constitutional amendment that would extend eligibility for the presidency to immigrants who have held U.S. citizenship for at least 20 years. Read more: www.foxnews.com...
But the Times canvassed California's congressional delegation to find out how many would support a Constitutional amendment allowing naturalized citizens to become President. Six out of eight Republicans who responded said "yes." Democrats were more closely split -- 9 yes, 7 no.
Originally posted by mb2591
Are you apart of the Obamanation?
Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) is the only president born of two immigrants, both Irish. Presidents with one immigrant parent are Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809), whose mother was born in England, James Buchanan (1857-1861) and Chester Arthur (1881-1885), both of whom had Irish fathers, and Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) and Herbert Hoover (1929-1933), whose mothers were born respectively in England and Canada.
Originally posted by kro32
Why do you think a couple of republicans speak for the whole party? Can you post a poll on how many republicans at the time actually supported this legislation?
Originally posted by mb2591
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
Im just saying it would make sense for you to post this thread if you were an Obama supporter
ETA I would imagine it would be met with even more stiff resistance now.edit on 2-7-2011 by mb2591 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by mb2591
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
Im just saying it would make sense for you to post this thread if you were an Obama supporter
ETA I would imagine it would be met with even more stiff resistance now.edit on 2-7-2011 by mb2591 because: (no reason given)
Right, because the only possible answer to someone skeptical of the GOP is a Democrat, right?
Right?
It must be tough thinking in dichotomies. Either this, or that. No in between. Would you like your burger raw, or cooked to charcoal?
Originally posted by mb2591
Ah hahah I like how you go all ridiculous on me without just asking why I think that.. thats pretty childish.
The reason I said it would make sense if you were an Obama supporter is because, It's seems like you made this thread in order to back up Obama, why else would you make a thread about something that was going on years ago if its not to relate to something going on now. I'm pretty sure you didn't want to just talk about it..
Originally posted by mb2591
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
Because that news is very old. It didn't happen. Also I can tell by you getting defensive that was your true intention. Why else would you make a thread.
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by mb2591
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
Because that news is very old. It didn't happen. Also I can tell by you getting defensive that was your true intention. Why else would you make a thread.
Yes, I am aware it is from the past. That is why it has the word REMEMBER in the title.
You seem like you are being too defensive. Are you one of those Republicans who wont admit to being a Republican during the past decade
But thanks for playing!
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
9 yes, 7 no.
ya so?
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
a collective thought that represents a majority vs. a small number of individuals in a party does not represent the whole
what is the purpose of this thread?