It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by survivalstation
reply to post by Youmakemewonder
Well, since I am the only poster who didn't say farewell to Glenn and said he balanced out the equation, I can only surmise you are speaking to me.
Originally posted by kro32
Way to be tolerant of someone else's views.
I don't see you guys mentioning the other side however like Ed Shulz, Rachael Maddow, or Keith Oberman.
Originally posted by survivalstation
In all honesty, I'm not a Glenn Beck follower or listener. I've caught him on cable a few times and heard his radio show once or twice.
Sure, it's always gloom and doom and that's what sells. Buy gold. Buy seeds. Buy freeze dried foods. When a Republican is president blame them for not doing enough. When a Democrat is president blame them for everything. That's just the way it goes. Both parties are evil, they both have their agendas, it's just that they try to achieve their goals in different directions.
Beck may be gone from FOX but I'll guarantee that he's not forgotten. He's built himself quite a following of people who hang on words like Soros, Agenda 21, United Nations, Sharia law and police state. Actually, quite similar in the way Alex Jones works.
Scare 'em, teach 'em, make them do their own research. If it opens one persons mind to the possibilities, I'd say it was worth it.
Just where do you get 'assume' out of surmise? Perhaps I should have drawn a conclusion or formulated a hypothesis? Would that have mattered? Probably not.
Originally posted by Youmakemewonder
Originally posted by survivalstation
reply to post by Youmakemewonder
Well, since I am the only poster who didn't say farewell to Glenn and said he balanced out the equation, I can only surmise you are speaking to me.
You know what happens when you assume?
Originally posted by kro32
Way to be tolerant of someone else's views.
I don't see you guys mentioning the other side however like Ed Shulz, Rachael Maddow, or Keith Oberman.
It turns out you look like you are not really paying attention or have an ego problem.
Originally posted by survivalstation
In all honesty, I'm not a Glenn Beck follower or listener. I've caught him on cable a few times and heard his radio show once or twice.
Sure, it's always gloom and doom and that's what sells. Buy gold. Buy seeds. Buy freeze dried foods. When a Republican is president blame them for not doing enough. When a Democrat is president blame them for everything. That's just the way it goes. Both parties are evil, they both have their agendas, it's just that they try to achieve their goals in different directions.
Beck may be gone from FOX but I'll guarantee that he's not forgotten. He's built himself quite a following of people who hang on words like Soros, Agenda 21, United Nations, Sharia law and police state. Actually, quite similar in the way Alex Jones works.
Scare 'em, teach 'em, make them do their own research. If it opens one persons mind to the possibilities, I'd say it was worth it.
Funny that I said he worked like Alex Jones as well, isn't it? Nothing else here addresses what I wrote. Maybe that is because you are busy assuming.edit on 2-7-2011 by Youmakemewonder because: (no reason given)
I thought this was just too funny...
Originally posted by jibeho
I find it rather amusing that people, led by media matters, actually think that Beck is leaving. Sure he won't be on Fox News but he's got theblaze.com, GBTV, glennbeck.com. Fox News was just the spring board for him. He's not slowing down and you all are going to be in a comical tizzy. It's amazing.
Originally posted by seabhac-rua
I see some comments here supporting Glenn Beck and I find it absolutely astounding that people cannot just step back and see that this is propaganda in its very purest form. Now I know that Beck may be saying things that some people here agree with, but how can anybody not hear alarm bells going off when subjected to this attempted manipulation, its insane.
Originally posted by survivalstation
Just where do you get 'assume' out of surmise?
Perhaps I should have drawn a conclusion or formulated a hypothesis? Would that have mattered? Probably not.
Quite honestly, I love the way Glenn Beck makes liberals bleed from their eyeballs.
I don't need to listen to the man to know that if he strikes a nerve with you, he's on to something.
Same with Alex Jones, same with Rush, same with Sean Hannity. The liberals can't stand them and I love them for the fact that the liberals can't stand them. Open your eyes and see the big picture or would you rather discuss the semantics of the word surmise?
Originally posted by Youmakemewonder
That just proves that facts do not matter. His audience is only interested in hate apparently since that is all you like about him.
Originally posted by Soldier of God
Beck always told listeners and viewers not to take his word for anything but to research everything for themselves. How is that manipulating?
Originally posted by niceguybob
Senteri,why does the audience only have to get smaller? Ever heard of syndication? He'll be able to take his show worldwide in different languages.
A LOT of people would love to hear American Left bashing around the globe in different languages.
Maybe you missed the ratings thing...He had the highest rated show in television history in the 5oclock time slot from a cable channel.
Everyone changes a channel when the information becomes redundent. Glen was becoming redundent.
He absolutly did not get fired. He was TOLD to knock it off and tone it down by Murdochs henchmen personally.
He balked.
He and Fox parted on good terms.
As much as he irritates the beegeezus out of me,he actually believes what he preaches and feels this is his calling. I'll give him a prop for his convictions, while he banks another 50million.
Yikes!!! I'm defending this nutcase? No, just keeping it honest.
Facts are Facts until he twists them,that's a gimmee.