It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kro32
Already a post on this.
www.abovetopsecret.com...edit on 30-6-2011 by kro32 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by JimOberg
Thanks for watching and posting. It would make it more helpful if you specify the actual date/time of the sequence. But having as many eyes on the camera views in search of anomalies can only be a good thing.
These look like lens smudges to me, but I'd want to see views from the same camera on subsequent sunrises to compare.
Thanks!
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
At first glance one might think it is just a glare, but pay close attention as they play with the lighting. Can somebody please explain what the hell is going on out there, because this stuff is starting to freak me out a little. Enjoy.
Originally posted by davidgrouchy
Originally posted by RealTruthSeeker
At first glance one might think it is just a glare, but pay close attention as they play with the lighting. Can somebody please explain what the hell is going on out there, because this stuff is starting to freak me out a little. Enjoy.
The camera is automatically adjusting to the light conditions. All digital cameras do this these days. It is not so noticable on Earth as the sun doesn't rise so fast from our perspective. Additionally here on Earth we do not usually go from complete blackness into unfiltered stark brightness of vacuum. If I were to download the video and speed it up, one would be able to see the lighting pulsate in a regular pattern as it adjusted downward while the image being captured is flooded with more and more light.
Notice that the anomaly that the mouse cursor indicates in the video is not really apparent until there is so much bright light availiable that lense flare is possible. In other words, from my experience in photography I see nothing unusual, and nothing that doesn't relate it's geometry directly to the lense itself.
David Grouchyedit on 30-6-2011 by davidgrouchy because: spelling
Originally posted by Peloquin
reply to post by RealTruthSeeker
Hi RealTruthSeeker,
I appreciate your ability to accept not so exciting explanations for something that got you very excited initially. That shows that you're willing to learn and that you're not someone who has to insist on his opinion even if it's proven wrong, just for the benefit of your pride. That indeed you're someone who's able to audit his conclusions for the benefit of a greater knowledge. (And wisdom )
That distinguishes you from many other people in the field of Ufology (and I'm talking about both sides of the fence, "believers" also as "debunkers") and results in you being someone, that is so much needed in this field:
A cautious investigator with an open mind for all possibilities.
go on!edit on 1/7/11 by Peloquin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BobAthome
Bet if u zoomed in real close u would see "volcanic ash cloud , then volcano rift/cone and light from lava etc,,,
Definetly would be helpfull too know,, the approx. Earth, Lan/Long for that cloud layer.