Killtown on 9/11

Not sure if anyone has looked at this website but, OMG it's so full of information from Pre-9/11 all the way up to 2006. Place will keep you busy for hours.

Oddities:
thewebfairy.com...

Smoking Gun:
thewebfairy.com...

Index:
thewebfairy.com...

Everything is colored coded with the flights.
thewebfairy.com...

I don't know, interesting website that I thought, most of you, might be interested in reading. It will take you like ages to even get through it all.

Enjoy.

reply to post by Manhater


So what do you think? See any problems with the presentation? Say, for instance, the "coincidence" that Jack Ruby died of cancer - why is this a coincidence? What does it have to do with 9/11?

reply to post by Manhater


Killtown is notorious for his outrageous claims and spamming

He has been banned from every forum.....

His claims are garbage - done more for shock value than to provide information

reply to post by thedman


This must be the last forum you 2 are allowed on, you should be more thankful.

And please stop with the off-topic comments.

Face facts, the buildings are an explosion MANY of them, nothing looks like a collapse.

Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
Face facts, the buildings are an explosion MANY of them, nothing looks like a collapse.

So you claim the buildings exploded, and did not collapse....

Well, I think they exploded and collapsed. As well, as having a plane fly into them. Those building should of still been left standing after the planes hit. And all I did was suggest the site, because it looks like the guy has done his homework. You can't dispute some of the stuff that is posted on the website. Way too long of a list to even go through.

reply to post by Manhater

You can't dispute some of the stuff that is posted on the website.

I infer from this statement that there is some stuff on this website that can be disputed? Like I stated above, I won't dispute that Jack Ruby died of cancer in prison, but what does it have to do with 9/11? Except, of course, the very tangental argument that if one conspiracy fantasy exist then so other fantasied must be true?

I never heard of Jack Ruby, so, I don't know and I can't answer you. But, like I said, the website is there for anyone who wants to view it, if you don't want to view it, then don't comment, or view it. Not starting an argument. But, some stuff on there can not be disputed, some can. He does cite some of his sources and what's not cited as sources is probably his own opinion. Not, going to grill him for that, because he's entitled to have an opinion, just like you or I. I didn't say take the website as gospel for crying out loud. Geesh..

It should be illegal to put "smoking gun" and "connecting the dots" in the same sentence. Every other time in history that someone puts "irrefutable evidence" and "I'm seeing what I want to see" together, lots of innocent people wind up dead.

Originally posted by Manhater
I never heard of Jack Ruby, so, I don't know and I can't answer you. But, like I said, the website is there for anyone who wants to view it, if you don't want to view it, then don't comment, or view it. Not starting an argument. But, some stuff on there can not be disputed, some can. He does cite some of his sources and what's not cited as sources is probably his own opinion. Not, going to grill him for that, because he's entitled to have an opinion, just like you or I. I didn't say take the website as gospel for crying out loud. Geesh..

edit on 27-6-2011 by Manhater because: (no reason given)

Uh, with all due respect, you brought it up, you posted the links, now you just want to be neutral about it? There are literally 100's of millions of websites out there, you purposely write a post about one and post the links and then don't want to discuss the specific merits or demirits of the content of the website?

By the way, Jack Ruby is the man accused of murdering Lee Harvey Oswald, the person accused of assisinating President Kennedy in 1963.

Originally posted by hooper


Uh, with all due respect, you brought it up, you posted the links, now you just want to be neutral about it? There are literally 100's of millions of websites out there, you purposely write a post about one and post the links and then don't want to discuss the specific merits or demirits of the content of the website?

By the way, Jack Ruby is the man accused of murdering Lee Harvey Oswald, the person accused of assisinating President Kennedy in 1963.

Where in fact did I discuss a specific TOPIC on the links (The titles to the links are his titles, not mine.) or Jack Ruby, for that matter? All I said, was this may be a site that SOME may be interested in. That's it. So, yes, I will remain neutral. You are entitled to your opinions and he's entitled to his. He has cited, some of his sources. If you are NOT INTERESTED, then don't go. You have that option. I'm not forcing you to read it. It is there for those who DO want to read it.

Now, I'm done responding to you.

Originally posted by Manhater

Originally posted by hooper


Uh, with all due respect, you brought it up, you posted the links, now you just want to be neutral about it? There are literally 100's of millions of websites out there, you purposely write a post about one and post the links and then don't want to discuss the specific merits or demirits of the content of the website?

By the way, Jack Ruby is the man accused of murdering Lee Harvey Oswald, the person accused of assisinating President Kennedy in 1963.

Where in fact did I discuss a specific TOPIC on the links (The titles to the links are his titles, not mine.) or Jack Ruby, for that matter? All I said, was this may be a site that SOME may be interested in. That's it. So, yes, I will remain neutral. You are entitled to your opinions and he's entitled to his. He has cited, some of his sources. If you are NOT INTERESTED, then don't go. You have that option. I'm not forcing you to read it. It is there for those who DO want to read it.

Now, I'm done responding to you.

edit on 27-6-2011 by Manhater because: (no reason given)

In other words this is simply spam for someone's website? This is a discussion forum.

I found all the GHW Bush links very interesting. Most of these are well corroborated by Russ Bakers' book Family of Secrets.
Also, the frame by frame of the Zapruder film animation that is linked is excellent, though horribly graphic.
Between all these stories lies an even more interesting one that will never see the light of day, but certainly can make for some entertaining theories.

The "author" of that material, "killtown," has had his run-in with ATS members, and exited with very little credibility remaining.
A Public Banning Today (Killtown)

In addition, "The Webfairy" has previously been outed several times as having contrived and/or manufactured false "evidence" regarding 9/11 issues.

well, I didn't know. I'm sorry, if I offended anybody.

But, how can you dispute the cite sources from news articles? I doubt all these cites to the websites of news articles are wrong. Especially his timeline. You do need to use the waybackmachine.

I just thought it was interesting.

Like, did you know, that the daughter of one of the pilots who died in 9/11, died in 2006, from a fire. You going to tell me he's lying about that too or, did he make that up as he went along? I find that a little odd.

I'm not standing up for the guy and what he did to some ATS members, because I don't know, it's not my business. I just found the website today and started to skim it and thought some of it was interesting, and thought others might enjoy the read as well. Like below. I'm not a psychic or a mind reader.

reply to post by Manhater


Why is this story significant? Approx. 3000 people died on 9/11/2001. Think about this way. Select any 3000 people at random today. What are the chances that either a child or parent of one of those 3000 people will die within 5 years of the date they were selected? Put it this way, would you bet any of your own money that no one of the 3000 would lose a child or parent within 5 years, suspicious circumstances or otherwise?

Also, what were you looking for that you found this website? I see this here every now and then. Someone claims to have just been casually surfing the web and "happened" upon this interesting website and just asks everyone to take a look, supposedly an agenda-neutral request.

Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Manhater

 

Why is this story significant? Approx. 3000 people died on 9/11/2001. Think about this way. Select any 3000 people at random today. What are the chances that either a child or parent of one of those 3000 people will die within 5 years of the date they were selected? Put it this way, would you bet any of your own money that no one of the 3000 would lose a child or parent within 5 years, suspicious circumstances or otherwise?

Also, what were you looking for that you found this website? I see this here every now and then. Someone claims to have just been casually surfing the web and "happened" upon this interesting website and just asks everyone to take a look, supposedly an agenda-neutral request.

I was looking for the officials that were on the scene in Waco, and the Oklahoma bombings that passed away on Sept. 11., and I can't remember where I read it. It's not on his site. So, that's not the place I read it. That's how I stumbled onto the site. Through a search engine.

Originally posted by Manhater
But, how can you dispute the cite sources from news articles?

The best way to convince someone of your lies and/or fabrications is to include elements of truth.

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
The "author" of that material, "killtown," has had his run-in with ATS members, and exited with very little credibility remaining.
A Public Banning Today (Killtown)

In addition, "The Webfairy" has previously been outed several times as having contrived and/or manufactured false "evidence" regarding 9/11 issues.

I think he got railroaded off ATS frankly, he was treated poorly and responded poorly, but had some interesting if not compelling theories especially about some of the broadcast television anamolies on the day of 9-11. I don't know what went on behind the scences or what was said on other sites that prompted ATS' reaction but I do know that with the way some members of the community here treated him on his threads, it wasn't a shining moment for ATS.

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord

Originally posted by Manhater
But, how can you dispute the cite sources from news articles?

The best way to convince someone of your lies and/or fabrications is to include elements of truth.

Ok, I will copy and past the article from the way back machine because it won't post the link. I'm sorry, didn't mean to spark anything.