It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by radarloveguy
reply to post by Swills
The whistleblowers you seek , are above the compartments that you know of .
They do not live amongst the general population , and enjoy their work , so
they won't be blowing any whistles .
... maybe one day
Originally posted by chrismicha77
Just a few guys that I think have some credibility but, others don't, are:
Phil Schneider - His story is very very solid but, some of his claims may have been twisted, to sound a bit more sensational.
Bob Lazar - A lot of people claim he is a fraud but he knows to much to be a total fraud. He also knew about element 115 way before it was "discovered" recently. So there is some validity to his claims! He has also passed a lie detector test.
David Adair - His claims have drawn attention from the Scientific community and most claim he's a hoaxer. Although, I am on the fence about his claims but, there is a lot of truth behind his statements. Whether his ideas are false or made up, they sure do sound to be plausable.
Originally posted by Imtor
Still, those former Air Force look credible and mostl ikely are. In the 1h 50 min conference from 2010 they said objects disabled their missiles. They explicitly said - they don't know if it is alien, other earth beings or anything -
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by chrismicha77
... the possibility that they are lying to ruin his rep is a real real. They've done it before, doing it right now, and will continue to do it in the future. So I guess to really find out is to look for ourselves
Look at Bob Lazar for instance... he put Area 51 on the map, no matter what you believe, it was him that made Area 51 a public statement.
You take the clues and do the legwork. If the story is false, you soon reach a dead end. But if the story has even a tiny shred of fact, you will be able to follow the bread crumbs to really solid info
Originally posted by FireMoon
As I pointed out on another thread. Whatever you might think of Bob Lazar..he said..."I'll show you UFOs" on a given date and time coming from the Area 51 and he did just that and to this date, I have seen nothing to contradict that he made good on his promise, not just once but several times.
Originally posted by CynicalWabbit
Federal Pen time, loss of all benefits and pension. Pretty harsh, until you get to that age when you don't care anymore about the penalties and come forward.
Originally posted by zorgon
...The problem with truth is what is the good of speaking the truth, when no one will believe you? Short of supplying the actual body or a piece of saucer made of some unknown element, it would never be believed anyway...
Originally posted by Swills
Where are the whistle blowers? How come no one is talking?
Originally posted by TheFlash
Originally posted by Swills
Where are the whistle blowers? How come no one is talking?
Watch the Disclosure Project videos...
Originally posted by GORGANTHIUM
reply to post by Swills
The goverment has security protocols for just about everything on material infomation and personel from classified level to above top secret level.The protocol security has a select security word reconition program which only really lets out infomation and personel within a certain security level.That level of security is deemed safe to release .Any thing or person above theses security levels is of greater importance and is protected very well.A lot of infomation and whistles blowers up to this point is either false ,madeup or deemed not a threat and can be allowed to be released to the general public.Because there is so many lies and disinfomation out there really benifits the goverment in better ways of really hiding its real secrets.If by the chance a important security word or words was released or stolen by goverment personel.They would be stopped very quickly.They would not even get the chance to place that infomation on the internet or even make a phone call.The goverment computer hackers are very good at geting into any computer and deleting material,planting material and montoring material.It makes it easyer for the goverment computer hackers when all computers have built it to them secret access codes that are untraceable and they can get into any computer on line.edit on 28-6-2011 by GORGANTHIUM because: added some more words
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Imtor
Still, those former Air Force look credible and mostl ikely are. In the 1h 50 min conference from 2010 they said objects disabled their missiles. They explicitly said - they don't know if it is alien, other earth beings or anything -
Well the thing is that there is one explanation of that that really fits..
Plasma Critters being curious. Since the critters are made of energy, the old safegaurd systems of the day would have been effected by any strong energy in proximity. These energy fluctuations cause by curious critters getting too close to the nukes (maybe attracted by the energy for a quick snack ) would have set off all kinds of bells and whistles on that old equipment and caused shutdowns.
Since no nukes were actually damaged, merely controls shut down, I would say it was harmless curiousity. And the descriptions of the objects is consistent with 'Critters'
Today our systems are more EM proof, but back then we were just getting started. Anyone remember all the glowing objects sighted near power lines and thunderstorms? Merely critters feeding off the EM energy
Perhaps this is why the Air Force and NASA can look us in the eye and say confidently that they pose no risk to national security. No critter has ever harmed anyone
Think about it
Originally posted by Bob Down Under
there was many sightings of solid shaped craft over silos
Originally posted by Swills
It's pretty easy to walk away with information, from my experience anyway. I could literally upload all of the intel to the internet from my work station and no one would be the wiser, at the time.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Swills
It's pretty easy to walk away with information, from my experience anyway. I could literally upload all of the intel to the internet from my work station and no one would be the wiser, at the time.
So ummm... whatcha got?
Problem with truth is what good is it to know the truth if no one believes you?edit on 6-7-2011 by zorgon because: (no reason given)