I am a Scientist.

Originally posted by rigel4
Thanks for taking the time to post on ATS, I have only one question which
really Interests me.

When do you think the Quantum Processor will arrive?

an how do you see it changing the world?

Thank you

It has already arrived.. But I wouldnt count on getting one for tens of years

reply to post by Moduli


Was light created ?

Welcome to ATS.
Nice of you to be entertained by our quest for truth.

reply to post by Moduli


Sup Troll =) (really, no one comes in announcing themselves as a more qualified individual do to their level
of education/intelligence/etc without a proclamation of passive aggressive intellectual dominance under the guise of Sir Helps A Lot)

mmmkay, that being said, if you're indeed, genuinely here to "help," I'd like to know how you can help if indeed you are a string theorist (with all the fancy letters behind your name to let the folks at home know you're qualified), help us answer questions about the top secret uh...string theories that are being held from the general public...

string theory, and all it's flavors are pretty old, not so cutting edge anymore, but really, not to troll you sir, as I've done up there ^, but what can a string theorist bring to the table of conspiracy, etc, aside from your superior logic as one must need to uh...well, actually superior logic isn't needed for a scientist of theoretical physics, as more so is a necessity of creativity, and imagination...something the tinfoil hatters are chock full of man; so, what I'm saying is, can you riddle me these, sir scientist:

A. 3rd law of thermodynamics: Why is it a law, when it cannot be proven? Why not, you ask; well, in order for (referring to can't create/destroy) for the cyclic currently most digestible theory of the universe (bang-crunch-bang...) to occur, this cycle had to have been created. I understand the previous crunch created this bang in which we are chimping around in, and that this bang will inevitably lead to another crunch to create another bang, etc, etc. What I don't understand is how this cycle was "created." Don't pretend you do either, and since it
can't be proven that the cycle of crunch/bang was an effect of a predecessor event, then the cycle was created from nothing (MAGIC) and violated the 3rd "law"


B. How is light able to be seen without 1. A light source B. human organs which received, and translate acoustic signals (i.e. ears). as in the case of dreaming (yeah, I think the brain has a quantum connection to the universe, and sound is just another illusory property of a crazy vibration zero point dimension, kinda like uh...Maya I think the Indian Hindus call it.

C. uhh...okay, glad to meet a scientist. I was jacking you up a bit to gauge your response which after reading this should be unemotional, or trollified, and if indeed you are mr. educatey pants, I look forward to picking your brain with questions from time to time.

So, what do you think about the holographic universe theory? String theory fits right into it, compliments it, and and seems to solidify it.


Do you use any psychoactive substances to enhance your nuerotools, or are you like "mad-educated," or a somewhat prodigy, run of the mill genius, or a brilliantly tortured psycho that has a problem with god (god is the missing variable, not referring to a deity or creator, rather than let's say god=g.u.t.)

Go smaller with strings, and you'll see rings making strings, and making the rings, are even more strings, strange enough like a fractal that's tough, when you keep digging deeper, one day, you'll find it's enough...



And what's up with the number nine. no cut and paste, I can't find a math dude to splain it to a dolt like me, you know th eunique properties which are bordering on numerology. (9xAnyWholeNumber=sum of digits=9) Just had a discussion of it with a friend who thought it was interesting.

reply to post by Moduli


I have to disagree, on your assumption that a craft cannot travel beyond the speed of light; simply because you can, if you have a magnetic force shield surrounding you ship.

Cheers,

Erno86

Originally posted by N34Li3Z
reply to post by Moduli

 

B. How is light able to be seen without 1. A light source B. human organs which received, and translate acoustic signals (i.e. ears). as in the case of dreaming (yeah, I think the brain has a quantum connection to the universe, and sound is just another illusory property of a crazy vibration zero point dimension, kinda like uh...Maya I think the Indian Hindus call it.

sorry, I was referring to closed eye hallucinations, and dreaming

reply to post by Moduli


Welcome to ATS!! So, there are no secret technologies that governments are working on? Cuz you said so?
Sorry to burst your bubble already on day 1.

Good luck on ATS! You will probably need it.

Originally posted by TETRA.X
reply to post by Moduli

 

Welcome to ATS!! So, there are no secret technologies that governments are working on? Cuz you said so?
Sorry to burst your bubble already on day 1.

Good luck on ATS! You will probably need it.

Well that is a 100% falsity... since the black budget accounts for all kinds of secretive projects. This is documented science fact, not fiction... which is another nail in the coffin for the OP.

Originally posted by MACchine

Originally posted by marriah3330

You ARE sooo funny GIRRRL !

I have seen the stats that show that the science these days with the scientists with the HIGHEST IQs are in the Biological sciences, and by a VERY significant margin, KNOW LONGER Physics like the good ole, bad old days !!

I guess its TRUE !!!

true, life sciences are a bit more harder, especially the brain, more mysterious than the universe itself, and physics, with computers can now be done with puters a lot, but theoretical physics isn't just "physics" and it's up there in the old stanford-binet/meschler (sp?) scale of high iq-ers, so don't knock theoretical physics brainerds, but regz physics, yeah..big woop, lol.

anyone know how magnets work? =P

Well, about all I have to say is your opening post didn't leave much to be desired by me, I thought you wrote kind of arrogantly hope you either get bored or feel better soon then you can get back to work.

One last thing is this;

My Alien buds say:

We try to hard through SCIENCE to prove things we just need to use logic and common sense the answers are the simplist the ones (you) always overlook

No charge for the info

Hi Moduli, I for one will give you the benefit of the doubt, and will take it for now that you are who you say you are.
However, you are leaving a world of hard factual science and entering a world where pseudo science, speculation, dis info, and suspicion are rife.
So tread carefully and avoid being provoked.
I have 2 questions for you.
1. Does the graviton exist?
2. Is the effect of gravity instantaneous?
For example, if our sun was snuffed out of existance,
would the earth leave its orbit immediately?
Thanks.

reply to post by Moduli


yes,hi,question,have scientists figured out how to safely travel through space at an accelerated rate yet?

Originally posted by Donegal_TDI
Hi Moduli, I for one will give you the benefit of the doubt, and will take it for now that you are who you say you are.
However, you are leaving a world of hard factual science and entering a world where pseudo science, speculation, dis info, and suspicion are rife.
So tread carefully and avoid being provoked.
I have 2 questions for you.
1. Does the graviton exist?
2. Is the effect of gravity instantaneous?
For example, if our sun was snuffed out of existance,
would the earth leave its orbit immediately?
Thanks.

I asked number one and according to the op yes.. His answer is somewhere on p 7-10 I think I'll double check

It's answered on page 6 and before page 6 but page 6 he "explains where gravitons come from"

Originally posted by Erno86
reply to post by Moduli

 

I have to disagree, on your assumption that a craft cannot travel beyond the speed of light; simply because you can, if you have a magnetic force shield surrounding you ship.

Cheers,

Erno86

easy, just convert the ship, temporarily, into nuetrinos, and when you arrive, bam...cut the regz switch back on. plus, who needs to travel a crazy distance when you can use einstein-rosenthall bridge (sorry podowski) it?

all you need apparently is some sort of crazy gyroscopic thingy, probably with lots of energy, and magnets, and rotating kerr singularities and such, like that one time traveller dude drew with the general electric diagram, john titor, yeah, that dude

reply to post by Moduli

Hello and welcome to ATS. Being a scientist and understanding the string theory, do you ever stop, empty your mind, and think about the implications of the grandfather paradox with regard to time travel?

You would have to abandon all real thought and delve into the mindset of people who frequent this site in order to accomplish such a task, but I find it a fascinating way to melt un-needed brain cells.

Have fun here and please don't be a stranger, we like smart folk around here. We point at them and whisper.

reply to post by MACchine


I believe, that an "antimatter" black hole does not exist in our Universe, simply because most, if not all of the antimatter, was destroyed in the Big Bang. Any antimatter would have to be produced by a hopefully "civilized" race.


Foofighter's


Erno86

I have a question about the big bang and time dilation. From what I hear, the universe appears to be 13.7 billion years old. Is this an objective number that accounts for time dilation as the universe approaches a singularity, or is it some kind of limit that only applies to us at the present time? Or to ask from another angle, if there were an observer 1 million years after the big bang, would they perceive the universe to be 1 million years old, or perhaps much older because of the high energy levels slowing down time?

Sorry if this question is poorly framed. I hope you can figure out what I'm trying to ask.

Moduli,welcome to the maelstrom that we call home,you gotta like it already,trust me your thread has created quite a stir,and rightfully so.

I see how busy you find yourself,I also see that you seem to have missed my questions on pg.7,posted by one4all.

Maybe seeing as how the word theory seems to be creeping up on you you might see relevance in addressing my questions which might help sort out the theory part.I know you are very well versed technically by reading your responses so naturally I expect you to be as well versed in the real "theoretical meat"of what you study and are familiar with.

If we can find a way to create a natural paralell or equivilant to your mathamatical thought process and direction,it may be possible to bring more people on board.

Because everything we "create"or manifest into reality as humans is born of a percieved need or want connected to an emotional realisation ,we are in essence copycats who are prone to emotional outbursts that cause us to exibit bursts of creative manifestation----hence mathematics and science which seek to quantify and replicate and innovate NATURE.

I feel there are only two components we can consider when conceptualising issues like string theory,and these are humans and their collective cumulative reality,everchanging as it may be,and ,NATURE IN HER INFINITE YET DEFINABLE SOLIDITY.

So I ask you to please using your well versed physics and math and theoretical knowledge base,to go backwards in concept and ideas to the beginnings of these things and tell me in your own english words without any numbers involved how your math and physics and even your theory originated?From what concept or perception or emotion or combonation of HUMAN AND NATURAL factors did these things come.

Then tell me in human words what NATURAL originals your complicated duplicates are based on.