It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by l_e_cox
reply to post by paranormal78
To me, it looks like what a planet would look like after it died. I think it stands as a warning to us to take better care of our own planet. I agree with those who think Mars used to be inhabited.
I never played much Doom 3 but I did see the movie "Mission to Mars", where the face on Mars was not just an illusion and a big tornado-like thing came out of it, that was pretty spooky until the end. And one of the most realistic parts of the movie was where the astronaut that had been living up there all by himself after his crewmates were killed, went a little bit crazy. I could see something like that really happening.
Originally posted by paranormal78
I guess the part that makes me think it's spooky is from playing allot of Doom 3.
How do you know that they are very wrong?
Originally posted by strNick
The scientific establishment is very wrong about Mars' past and, perhaps, present. For instance, what is this blue thing which coats about 1/4 of the planet's surface? They don't even mention this fact!
Maybe they don't mention that "fact" because what you think is a fact, isn't a fact. Did you look at the legend for the colors in the image you posted?
Originally posted by strNick
The scientific establishment is very wrong about Mars' past and, perhaps, present. For instance, what is this blue thing which coats about 1/4 of the planet's surface? They don't even mention this fact!
Take a look at this image.
Some parts were more believable than others.
Originally posted by Illustronic
That Mars terraforming movie that stared Val Kilmer would have been merely just laughable if any of it was remotely believable. It should be categorized in the B movie section, beside Amazon Women on the Moon.
Originally posted by l_e_cox
reply to post by paranormal78
To me, it looks like what a planet would look like after it died. I think it stands as a warning to us to take better care of our own planet. I agree with those who think Mars used to be inhabited.
Some words have meaning in context. I take that use of "after it died" to mean "lifeless". While we don't know with any certainty whether or not Mars is truly lifeless or not (it may harbor life we haven't seen yet in the soil, for example), I wouldn't disagree with the general sentiment of l_e_cox's comment. Mars once had more abundant water, and probably a much more substantial atmosphere, and was probably more capable of supporting complex lifeforms, than it is today.
Originally posted by LucidDreamer85
If a planet died , wouldn't it just disintegrate and turn into nothingness...not resume being a planet ? It can't be dead.
Originally posted by l_e_cox
To me, it looks like what a planet would look like after it died. I think it stands as a warning to us to take better care of our own planet. I agree with those who think Mars used to be inhabited.
That sounds like a pretty clever plan mate, I like the idea for restoring the magnetic field though moving a moon a quarter the size of Mars into orbit will be a big challenge. If our survival depends on it, we might figure out a way to do it.
Originally posted by Fromabove
As for terraforming Mars, it would not be that hard. For water, there is a vast frozen supply under the surface. Also, redirecting iceroids into impact zones would create liquid water and increase atmospheric pressure. Moving (very carefully), a large body about 1/4 the size of Mars into Mars orbit would cause the core to heat and liquify under stress. The core would "percolate" and start the dynamo effect creating a strong electromagnetic force protecting the planet from solar radiation.