It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HUMBLEONE
But I bet you can still get a PRINCE ALBERT in Frisco!
Originally posted by MikeNice81
reply to post by Klassified
Maybe I am a bit ignorant but isn't this a violation of the freedom of religion? What about the jewish faith that requires circumcision for a boy child to be accepted in to the culture?
Laws can be invalidated. The point MikeNice81 was making, it seems to me, is that he believes this law could be unconstitutionally infringing on the freedom of religion.
Originally posted by Klassified
This could be a violation of freedom of religion. But even religious groups in this country have to obey the law. So if this becomes law...
If it’s thrown out of court your ‘side’ loses. Your ‘side’ is the one challenging it.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
Don't panic....... it won't become law because my side will win.....thats if it's not thrown out of court beforehand
The origination of male circumcision is not known with certainty.
It has been variously proposed that it began as a religious sacrifice, as a rite of passage marking a boy's entrance into adulthood, as a form of sympathetic magic to ensure virility or fertility, as a means of enhancing sexual pleasure, as an aid to hygiene where regular bathing was impractical, as a means of marking those of higher social status, as a means of humiliating enemies and slaves by symbolic castration, as a means of differentiating a circumcising group from their non-circumcising neighbors, as a means of discouraging masturbation or other socially proscribed sexual behaviors, as a means of removing "excess" pleasure, as a means of increasing a man's attractiveness to women, as a demonstration of one's ability to endure pain, or as a male counterpart to menstruation or the breaking of the hymen, or to copy the rare natural occurrence of a missing foreskin of an important leader, and as a display of disgust of the smegma produced by the foreskin. It has been suggested that the custom of circumcision gave advantages to tribes that practiced it and thus led to its spread.
People mistakenly believe the circumcised penis is cleaner because smegma is reduced. The myth that the intact penis is difficult to clean is exactly that—a myth. Cleaning is so simple it’s amazing that people fret so much about it. The big hoopla over hygiene is pure paranoia. The fact is, smegma is beneficial, not bad.
And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin. And it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
Originally posted by Klassified
The Jews do it because it was part of their perpetual covenant with the Hebrew God.
Genesis 17:11
And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin. And it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
So this has been a practice for thousands of years.
Sacrifices are a common theme in most religions, though the frequency of animal, and especially human, sacrifices are rarely performed today.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by gps777
Thats fine to me.
It doesn`t say it should be done to babies and children.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Exactly. I don't understand how people can do this to their children. I guess if they wait until he grows up, he might not want to have it done, so they get to him before he has any power to defy...
Religion makes people do insane things. :shk: