It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nosred
Nuclear power is much safer and disasters are incredibly unlikely to happen, not to mention that an accident at a nuclear power plant is not as bad as an accident at a coal plant or a dam breaking.
Originally posted by Observer99
How... can you even believe this.
How many square km of the Earth are now off limits as a direct result of nuclear power accidents? Lots
How many are off limits due to coal accidents? Uhh... none.
Where did you get these numbers? Source? Around 50 people died as a direct result of the radiation from Chernobyl, and it's estimated that 9000 others have died or will die from cancer as a result, although that number is disputable and unprovable.
1 million people died due to Chernobyl. Maybe another million will die from Fukushima. And if the incredibly dangerous Monju reactor goes, it would be much, much worse. It could literally destroy Japan.
While coal is dirty and oil can be dirty, especially when criminal corporations have total disregard for safety, the fallout from nukes will poison the planet for hundreds or thousands of years. It is an absolutely insane technology to pursue and anyone who supports it is also insane.
Originally posted by AuntB
I apologize to all for getting way off subject. So, do we really know what is happening at these two plants? Is anyone on this site that lives near there? I read a post earlier and someone mentioned blackhawk choppers, national guard. I want to know the true danger regarding these plants.
Originally posted by Nosred
reply to post by bigwig22
Yes I said IF, just like airplanes aren't safe IF you build them without wings. So you're surprised that not following safety guidelines causes safety problems?
Originally posted by AuntB
reply to post by jameshawkings
You know, that is something to think about. I wonder if because of Fukushima people are focusing more upon the power plants or have these issues been happening and we are oblivious to them. Now this virus, is this the one that took out the Iranian plant?
Originally posted by bigwig22
Haha, i like that comparison. But in fact, planes would be much safer without wings as they will not be able to leave the ground
Originally posted by Nosred
reply to post by cloaked4u
Radiation does not make three headed frogs, stop being ignorant.
Originally posted by Munfett
Without taking sides in this debate I can't understand the veracity you use to attack people. You deem some members as "ignorant" who have their own opinions.
Originally posted by NEWclearMind
reply to post by Nosred
I've tried, I told them that if any issue ever arose, I would be the first to blow the whistle. I have friends at over 30 of the United States 102 nuclear plants and monitor the NRC'S website daily. The is one of the most safest industries period. You get 200 times more radiation smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for a year than the yearly dose from working at a nuclear plant. Pilots get many times more than that. They keep fear mongering. They love stars and flags. Although, I admit, these guys are in a rough situation, it's nothing more right now than a really bad couple weeks of work.. They will keep the health and safety of the public their number one concern.