It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by christine76
reply to post by Cryptonomicon
This has not been going on for decades. Since when have passengers been subjected to pat downs?
Originally posted by snowen20
Originally posted by christine76
(The things that were going through my mind!!! I could have screamed at this woman, obscenities, and hateful names!!!!!)
My question is,....Why didn't you?
Didn't want your kids to see you get mad about being groped?
Was it worth it to not get outraged and show your frustration?
If yes, then why have you written this thread?
Originally posted by Cryptonomicon
Originally posted by christine76
reply to post by Cryptonomicon
This has not been going on for decades. Since when have passengers been subjected to pat downs?
She was subjected to a pat down because she didn't warn the metal detector operator that she had pins in her legs. So when the metal detector went off, she played games by only answering the questions they were asking her, like did she have belt, "Why no I already took it off," acting like she had no idea what could possibly be setting it off.
Only after no other options were available did she announce she had metal pins in her legs.
That is by definition, suspicious. So she has to get searched. That HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR DECADES.
Oh my gosh, you are so wrong it's ridiculous! I never had a belt on to begin with. I have never had to tell anyone at any airport that I have plates, screws, rods - in both of my legs! It has never, ever been an issue. I have flown to Cancun, Mexico, Corpus Christi, Texas, and Denver, Colorado since my accident and not one time did I alert a metal detector. All of this since 2005. You don't know ME, so there is no way for you to assume how I was acting.
Originally posted by Anonymous Avatar
Originally posted by 2012king
sorry if this offends, but you got searched.... wheres the problem?
if you had been behind somebody who set the alarm off and wasnt properly searched afterwards, who then went on to hijack the flight, who would you be blaming then?
the security on airports have a job to do, and its for a good reason. they cant just take peoples word for it or the airlines would be in chaos. i used to work on a court where we searched people all day and never had any problems. some people didnt like it, but if they refused a search, they were refused entry.
i know you didnt refuse a search and i am sorry if you felt badly done to, but if you dont like the idea of being searched at an airport, dont fly.
Actually if you are scared of terrorists around every corner trying to hijack planes all the time and are willing to sexually assault innocent women and children to satisfy your selfish and childish fears then how about YOU DON'T FLY. Let the big boys and girls do the things that require us to take care of ourselves and our own safety.
Your mentality is what lead to the rise of the 3rd reich and now to the 4th reich in America.edit on 22-6-2011 by Anonymous Avatar because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kro32
Originally posted by wildoracle13
reply to post by AshleyD
I agree with you but on the same hand, if we choose to not fly it means we are reliquishing our rights to fly. They win. I see why she wanted to stay in the public eye, everyone needs to see and understand what is required by the airlines to be on a plane. This isn't something we should agree to behind closed doors. If this procedure is so invasive that it needs to be hidden from the public maybe it's crossing a line. And I don't see how boycotting by a few anti-TSAers is going to change or effect one thing. We need to continue to live as free citizens as long as possible because I don't see it lasting very long.
It's not invasive and it's a procedure that's been used since people have been wearing clothes for any number of reasons. Takes less than 20 seconds and it's done for a specific purpose of preventing unwanted things from happening. It's purpose is not to get a free sqeeze in on your breast or genitles and if you can't handle this then how do these people put up with physicals from the doctor?
I've been patted down before and just throw out your arms, let them work, and move on. Ever watch cops? Every person on that show is getting patted down and it's just part of a quick search or does that mean that every cop only became an officer so he could get quick feels in.
A little common sense is a good thing
Originally posted by MConnalley
I respect that you did not enjoy this, but i do believe that you had exaggerated the perception of what was happening, a 9 year old is capable of holding a child down if asked to do so, no contingencies were met by you to keep what had happened from happening ( by that I only mean your child touching you, not the metal plates). You were even asked if you needed a private room, you could've started a conversation with the woman who was patting you down while it was happening and had found her possibly quite personable. things could have gone in a very positive way despite the the negativity that is the TSA conspiracy.edit on 22-6-2011 by MConnalley because: (no reason given)
Now all they will need is for Israel to pull one of its full-flags TM attacks on the US to blame on one of it’s proclaimed enemies. Get ready to hear them cry “wolf wolf”. Both they and the brass in USA would gladly sacrifice US lives to appease the gods of war. History bares this out. The boys at the top of the ladder are as traitorous as ever could be, for they are part of a Satanic death-cult. Sickening excuses for humanity. The goyim will fulfill the wishes of their Zionist master cause they know they are just sacrificial-sheep numb-skulls who can’t think for themselves. Your military are brainless robots under remote control — brain washed Zombies, out to proof their inferiority, to the Zionist masters. The masters secretly laugh at their “war-dogs” for being so sheepishly stupid and easy to fool.
Originally posted by christine76
reply to post by JibbyJedi
Your post made me think of The Minority Report, and the precog's. I'd hate to see a world where we are punished for crimes that may be committed, but it is headed that way..
Originally posted by 2012king
lol, are you serious?
maybe you need to unplug and come back to reality for a while.
anyway, would it please you if there were seperate flights for people who didnt want to be searched? i know which ones i would go on!!!
the sad fact is, there are terrorists willing to take any opportunity to exploit security, wether its on a flight, or entering buildings.
it happens and its a known fact, so to say that security personell are satisfying some sick desire to grope people is absolutly absurd.
when you take a job in security (in the UK anyway) you have to have background checks, criminal checks and all sorts. it is a bit of a joke, but they choose to do that job to keep people safe, not to publicly humiliate them by "groping" as you naively suggested.
Originally posted by MConnalley
I respect that you did not enjoy this, but i do believe that you had exaggerated the perception of what was happening, a 9 year old is capable of holding a child down if asked to do so, no contingencies were met by you to keep what had happened from happening ( by that I only mean your child touching you, not the metal plates). You were even asked if you needed a private room, you could've started a conversation with the woman who was patting you down while it was happening and had found her possibly quite personable. things could have gone in a very positive way despite the the negativity that is the TSA conspiracy.edit on 22-6-2011 by MConnalley because: (no reason given)