It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Did you watch the video? They were not in process of pulling 3 guys from the car. They were in posession of one guy in cuffs. Lying much?
Originally posted by PsykoOpsMiddle? Nice way to move the goal posts. I said quite clearly "sidewalk by...
Originally posted by anon72
More from your link> (which I think you could do it's own thread).
reply to post by PsykoOps
At approximately 5:30pm, four police cars were seen driving east on Troup St. and then turned right onto Clarissa St. The police cars parked a block down from the Flying Squirrel and got out of their cars holding clips boards and ticket books. They proceeded to walk down the line of parked cars on Clarissa St. checking registrations and inspections directly across from where the meeting was taking place. They then proceeded to pull out rulers to measure the distance from the curb to the tires of each car. They stated that they had received civilian complaints regarding cars being parked too far from the curb on Clarissa St.
What a Crock of Male Bovine Feces. If this is true, I hope the State AG's office is alerted and the NY Gov's office.
First thing they need to do is obtain the "report of compliant" about the cars being more than 12 inches .
You know what, I don't need to write more. The story and vid is self-explanatory.
People in that area better MAN UP and start bitching up a storm. This is just crazy on the Cops points.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by SFA437
. . .
Seeing as how I explained in great detail that a crime scene can/will extend out from the exact place where the suspect is or where the crime occurred
--Strictly speaking, a crime scene is a location wherein evidence of a crime may be found.--
"A crime scene is any physical scene, anywhere, that may provide potential evidence to an investigator."
So what evidence was on her property?edit on 6/24/2011 by Lemon.Fresh because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SFA437
Going to be a very unpopular comment but the arrest was good.
If someone is shot on your property (creating a crime scene) you do NOT have the right to go over and stand on the body, walk around as you see fit and do whatever you want. Sorry- it doesn't work that way.
In this case the traffic stop is a crime scene. Having someone standing in my vicinity while my attention needed to be focused on the vehicle and occupants is a distraction that could get me killed. Even disregarding the distractions of now having to look behind me to see what is going on- someone within 25 feet of me (even if I was facing them) can get a knife from a belt and stick it in my chest before I can draw my weapon to defend myself.
Originally posted by SFA437
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by SFA437
. . .
Seeing as how I explained in great detail that a crime scene can/will extend out from the exact place where the suspect is or where the crime occurred
--Strictly speaking, a crime scene is a location wherein evidence of a crime may be found.--
"A crime scene is any physical scene, anywhere, that may provide potential evidence to an investigator."
So what evidence was on her property?edit on 6/24/2011 by Lemon.Fresh because: (no reason given)
Those carrying narcotics typically throw them in order for them not to be found on their person. This would include the woman's front yard. I can articulate 1000 reasons why her yard could be included however that is neither here nor there.
You want to see REAL law enforcement abuses start with the BATFE- not with some chick looking to make a name for herself by obstructing an officer.
Originally posted by SFA437
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Did you watch the video? They were not in process of pulling 3 guys from the car. They were in posession of one guy in cuffs. Lying much?
There were 3 people in the vehicle. One had been removed at the time of the video. 4 individuals were involved, including the woman videotaping the scene. Reading comprehension issues much?
Originally posted by SFA437
No part of that statement.
Seeing as how I explained in great detail that a crime scene can/will extend out from the exact place where the suspect is or where the crime occurred I'm going to assume you're slightly mentally impaired from now on.
TYVM for your input.
Originally posted by Kitilani
No one was and that did not happen.
Originally posted by Kitilani
No. You cannot pull a traffic stop at the curb outside my home and then start telling me which part of my home I have to be in because of where you decided to create a crime scene not involving me or my property. How about everyone that likes the sound of that Amerika raise their hand.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Omg.
The citizens were attending a meeting to discuss the arrest of Emily Good, the 28-year-old woman who was jailed for videotaping cops from her front yard, when they realized cops were outside issuing tickets for having parked more than 12 inches from the curb.
Source has video.
Originally posted by SFA437
Seeing as how I explained in great detail that a crime scene can/will extend out from the exact place where the suspect is or where the crime occurred I'm going to assume you're slightly mentally impaired from now on.
TYVM for your input.
Originally posted by SFA437
reply to post by Kitilani
If I had found the thread where the Pima County deputies shot Mr. Guerena earlier I'd have weighed in on those a$$hats flat out murdering him. I'd have said they were the most unprofessional, overzealous and undisciplined group of yahoos I have ever seen wear a badge.
I was an FTO for 7 years. I took a lot of rookies badges for playing Buford T. Justice and sent them home without a job. I tried explaining the difference between a law enforcement officer (new term) and a peace officer- some understood and became fine cops, others found a new line of work.
In this case the woman refused to move despite the officer stating that her presence was distracting him from his job. Anything that distracts from the performance of the officers duty is by definition obstruction. End of story.
Had the woman in question not been such a dimwit and continue to goad the officer, causing him to shift his attention from his investigation to her actions guess what..... she'd not have gone to jail. Can you imagine that? If she had listened to the officer, understood his reasoning and said "You know what- I make this guy nervous I'll just video this from my porch" nothing would have happened.
UNREAL isn't it?
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
If if if. That is all you guys supporting this officer can give. It is all what if's and theoreticals.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Given the evidence at hand . . . what would make her yard a crime scene?
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
If nothing, then they have no jurisdiction.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
You can bring all the what-if's in the world to try and bolster your point of view. But they do not support the facts at hand. Not even remotely.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
And once again . . . by the legal definition . . . how was she obstructing?
Originally posted by SFA437
There were 3 people in the vehicle. One had been removed at the time of the video. 4 individuals were involved, including the woman videotaping the scene. Reading comprehension issues much?
Perhaps English not your first language (in which case I will explain the article in small, single syllable words if need be)
Originally posted by Kitilani
OK? Why are you telling me what you would have done about some other topic if you had read about some other topic? You lost me.
Originally posted by Kitilani
I did just make cookies too, so you want one is what you are saying?
Originally posted by Kitilani
Oh, you either have not watched the video or are a liar. Not sure which but I think you know how your "opinion" on this is going to go over now that I see where it is coming from. She moved twice.
Originally posted by Kitilani
Right, if only she had just done what she was told, she would not be in jail. Heil RPD! You know what, if you watched the video you would see he was all finished up detaining his stop and that the woman backed up twice.
Originally posted by SFA437
A crime scene is a crime scene and that includes a bubble around the officers working it.
Actually the officer can.
Would I have done it? Probably not but I wasn't there- I didn't see what the woman was doing, where her other hand was and a million other variables that raised the officers antenna enough for him to address her. My own personal take on being a police officer was to interfere as little as possible in people's lives. Blip of the lights before I'd pull a car. If I did pull them warning before ticket, ticket before arrest. Everyone's day went easier that way.
In this case something made the officer uncomfortable and this caused him to be distracted from discharging his duties, made more serious by 2 unknown individuals still within the vehicle. This woman was looking to make a point and talked herself into being arrested so she got what she wanted. Why is that an issue?
Anything that distracts from the performance of the officers duty is by definition obstruction. End of story.
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by SFA437
There were 3 people in the vehicle. One had been removed at the time of the video. 4 individuals were involved, including the woman videotaping the scene. Reading comprehension issues much?
The woman was standing with two people, bringing that total to 6. Watching comprehension issues much?
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by Manhater
Excuse me, I thought you said 3 were in the car and 1, was in cuffs with the police. Pardon me.
That would make sense if perhaps I had been talking too fast but the luxury of written words is that you had the time to read them over and over again and wait until you understand them to respond. Here is what I wrote again. I will explain it this time.
Originally posted by Kitilani
They pulled over "3" people. They arrested a 4th person and they let one suspect go. Tell me what is missing.
Since the woman who was arrested was not one of the three men pulled over, I would guess that makes her that 4th person.