It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PhantomLimb
reply to post by ButterCookie
This is repugnant. Forced sterilization? I think you have some personal problems you need to take care of if you're wanting to control what goes on inside of someone's body through force by the state.
Originally posted by ButterCookie
Yes Yes Yes... Pass this everywhere!! The legislators should not worry about being politically correct and get this done already! And how in the world is this an invasion of 'privacy?' When you apply for PUBLIC assistance which includes PUBLIC housing, PUBLIC transportation, PUBLIC childcare, and PUBLIC benefits, you gave up your 'rights' to privacy....
What happens when you come off welfare and want children, can you reverse the steralization?
Dont forget in these hard times you never know when YOU or one of YOURS may end up on welfare, god forbid.
Funny when times are tough and we have all been done over by our governments and the Banksters that some now are advocating Eugenics and sterilisation.
Originally posted by woodwardjnr
Funny when times are tough and we have all been done over by our governments and the Banksters that some now are advocating Eugenics and sterilisation.
Originally posted by laiguana
reply to post by woodwardjnr
I get what you're saying, but that doesn't excuse people from breeding recklessly knowing their financial circumstances are less than stable. It doesn't take a genius to figure that out.
If we are to confront the corruption in our nation we must be able to strengthen ourselves as much as possible. We cannot have too many attachments in these times. If they cannot afford their own children what makes you think anyone else can?
Pragmatism must be implemented by the people if they truly intend to counter-act the destructive forces that are running this and many nations into the ground.edit on 21-6-2011 by laiguana because: (no reason given)