It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
A missile would not have hit so many objects going towards the pentagon if it was a missile.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
hilarious how the youtube videos get no love when they support the OS
hilarious
the missile theory is so silly it's not even worth discussing tbh. or is that the shot down one, I get so confused
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
Thanks for the overwhelmingly "conclusive evidence"! I must admit, it's pretty hard to argue with a cartoon. After a long 10 years, I can finally put my mind to rest.
Originally posted by balon0
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
A missile would not have hit so many objects going towards the pentagon if it was a missile.
Yes and a plane could.
Last time I checked a plane was much much better than a missle... is it not?
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
A missile would not have hit so many objects going towards the pentagon if it was a missile.
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
Thanks for the overwhelmingly "conclusive evidence"! I must admit, it's pretty hard to argue with a cartoon. After a long 10 years, I can finally put my mind to rest.
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
Originally posted by balon0
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
A missile would not have hit so many objects going towards the pentagon if it was a missile.
Yes and a plane could.
Last time I checked a plane was much much better than a missle... is it not?
yep,your correct,a missle doesnt have a wingspan.