It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
Maybe the fairest way to reform campaign finance is to make all campaigns federally funded equally, and not allow ANY outside donations. Of course to make it truly fair, the funds should go to any candidate who meets all the criteria for running for the office. Once the campaign is over, all candidates would have to submit receipts for monies spent, and return any unused portion.
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
Maybe the fairest way to reform campaign finance is to make all campaigns federally funded equally, and not allow ANY outside donations. Of course to make it truly fair, the funds should go to any candidate who meets all the criteria for running for the office. Once the campaign is over, all candidates would have to submit receipts for monies spent, and return any unused portion.
Originally posted by HoonieSkoba
I think the best thing that can be done at this time is to insist on full transparency when $$ is spent by an individual or corporation on an election issue or candidate.
Stop secret campaign donations - everyone should be required to publicly report where they've spent money for political purposes. If George Soros gives a million dollars to MoveOn.org, the public should know.
Why not give tax breaks to the media outlets. Take the money issue right out of it. TV, print, whatever, get tax breaks and they MUST give equal time.
Originally posted by HoonieSkoba
Why not give tax breaks to the media outlets. Take the money issue right out of it. TV, print, whatever, get tax breaks and they MUST give equal time.
Who defines 'equal' and what parties would benefit?
I stand by my statement that that you can't take the money out of it until the feds have less money for organizations to lobby to attain!
I say let the dictionary define equal. We had that for our federal election this year. Even the Communist party got air time on CBC. It's a gov't run station and if everyone didn't get their time, parties could have yelled to high heaven.
As to the second statement, no money is a lot better than less money. It would take the special int. groups right out of it.
Originally posted by Springer
IF we are to have GENUINE campaign finance reform the rules need be bullet proof and SIMPLE. Each candidate ghets to spend X number of dollars 100% of which is paid by the government PERIOD, by by special interest purchase power...
[edit on 8-9-2004 by Springer]
Originally posted by Amuk
But if the government pays 100% doesnt that mean that they handpick the candidates even more than they do already?