NJ UFO clear pics

photos.nj.com...

Of course, its a mylar balloon the local college kids strung together and lofted yonder..of course..



ATTENTION!! How to properly share a video link:

ATS Terms and Conditions of Use

1k.) Video links/embeds: You will not embed or post a link to a video without a reasonable description of its content and why it interests you, is germane to the topics discussed on ATS or the topic of an existing thread should you post it in a reply to an existing thread.

So remember:

* Link
* Description
* Review/Opinion

edit on June 18th 2011 by greeneyedleo because: (no reason given)

reply to post by ATSZOMBIE


Reminds me of those Jurassic crustacean fossils. Can't remember what the species was called. Either CGI or one of those has learned how to fly.

I would like to read more comments from the witness, they didn't mention how it left their field of vision.was it obscured by buildings? Did it just zoom off? How thoroughly does Mufon check its witness for B.S.? I dont see any obvious signs of CG tampering but someone will have to analyze in Photoshop I guess

Originally posted by ThinkingCap
reply to post by ATSZOMBIE

 

Reminds me of those Jurassic crustacean fossils. Can't remember what the species was called. Either CGI or one of those has learned how to fly.

Trilobites? My God what if they're back...and they're huge and fly

Looks like a kite, im sure you can see the string?
2nd

The witness made no mention of seeing anyone with strings, and the obvious motion of a kite is well..obvious..


reply to post by chaztekno

It does look kinda like a crustacean, lol. At first glance I thought it was one of those spiky-backed spiders that I used to see all the time. The thing I don't like about ufo pictures such as this one is the fact that you cannot gauge the distance. And if you can't gauge the distance it is much more difficult to determine whether it is a hoax. So while some may say this is evidence, I say it's just a semi-cool picture that could possible be a ufo. Or a dinosaur or a spider.

reply to post by ATSZOMBIE


I think I see a little bit of something hanging down from it, like a cord or string.

Another picture without enough detail to convince me.

Looks like the drones fromthe movie battle of los angeles. Cant find a good picture from google images but they have a flying drone in the movie that looks very similar.

reply to post by ATSZOMBIE


You attack anyone who dares say anything that doesnt agree with you and what you personally think, it seems im not alone in seeing a string. This is ATS photos get debunked, live with it!

Here is the pic, I kind of think they are very similar


[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/1143fcb81805.jpg[/atsimg]

Ok I have an easy way to settle this. How about an alien balloon. This way everyone is happy.

Not sure what to think. A professional would have to analyze this for cgi. Since it does not look like a kite or balloon to me. But appearances can be deceiveing when objects are not close enough to discern fine details. Although this does have more detail than most. Which is all the more reason for proper analysis.

Originally posted by elouina
Ok I have an easy way to settle this. How about an alien balloon. This way everyone is happy.

Lol, star for being a unique thinker!

"They may be chinese lanterns, but alien chinese lanterns from outer space!"

-- why dont we call it outer space anymore, it's now just normal space.

I miss the 1970's where we could watch 1940 movies and believe it was possible.. .

This is most likely a balloon, a string is visible below it:

reply to post by elevenaugust


I can replicate the second image, but not the third.

As long as you didn't add to the image to show the 'tail' then I think this adds greatly to the image.

How did you get the third frame?

Good work though!

Thanks, but the third frame was the second with only my add to show the tail, maybe I extrapolated a bit (especially at the end of the tail when it could be confused with the grainy background), but the tail is clearly visible nonetheless.

reply to post by ATSZOMBIE


Well we have the witness name, but no EXIF data, and many other crucial facts are missing. We also need the original images straight off the camera. Without these, we can't rule out a cluster of balloons.