Worms from Hell on Mars?

I bet there's a lot of life on planets just in our solar system, imagine under the gasses of jupiter or saturn!

reply to post by SLAYER69


rename your thread to


"scientists discovered a new species of worm (1.3 kilometers) below the Earth's surface."




i wish threads had a flag down button no star or flag for u

reply to post by SLAYER69


Awesome! Worms living where They though nothing could live! That surely pushes the envelope of where We might find life.

Thanks Slayer. I needed an uplifting story.

Originally posted by Asktheanimals
A chill ran up my spine when a thought about oil and the possibility that some form of life (maybe these very worms!) is producing it,

Ah so finally the truth of the origin of oil comes out, after all these years of them telling us about dinosaur poop fossils being the source.

But then it's old news to some of us. Story from the Times 2008

Scientists find bugs that eat waste and excrete petrol
Silicon Valley is experimenting with bacteria that have been genetically altered to provide 'renewable petroleum'
www.thelivingmoon.com...



Some diesel fuel produced by genetically modified bugs

He means bugs. To be more precise: the genetic alteration of bugs – very, very small ones – so that when they feed on agricultural waste such as woodchips or wheat straw, they do something extraordinary. They excrete crude oil.

Unbelievably, this is not science fiction. Mr Pal holds up a small beaker of bug excretion that could, theoretically, be poured into the tank of the giant Lexus SUV next to us. Not that Mr Pal is willing to risk it just yet. He gives it a month before the first vehicle is filled up on what he calls “renewable petroleum”. After that, he grins, “it’s a brave new world”.

Times Online
www.timesonline.co.uk...

So I wonder what these Geysers on Mars really are










Anyone want to buy Oil Prospects on Mars I figure if that guy selling Lunar Realestate can get away with it... why not?

reply to post by zorgon


Dust devils.

They're very common on Mars, but I didn't know they were THAT common, practically traveling in packs.

reply to post by SLAYER69


According to the article, this worm was not specifically found on Mars, right?

Originally posted by queenofsheba
reply to post by SLAYER69

 

According to the article, this worm was not specifically found on Mars, right?

Right.
The article went on to discuss the "possibility" of worms being found on Mars

Originally posted by TupacShakur
Dust devils.
They're very common on Mars, but I didn't know they were THAT common, practically traveling in packs.

No those are black sand geysers that occur when the carbon dioxide ice melts. When the dry ice melts it melts from the bottom first so a weird thing happens. The ice levitates. Then when the pressure breaks through you get these geysers... thousands of them. This is a truly Barsoomian phenomena

But why is the sand black? and why does it leave these weird markings?

Originally posted by queenofsheba
According to the article, this worm was not specifically found on Mars, right?

This one came from Mars... hitched a ride on a Martian meteorite and landed in Antarctica



Martian meteorite surrenders new secrets of possible life
spaceflightnow.com...

Mind you the fact that this rock got blasted off Mars. reached escape velocity, got on a heading for Earth and managed to land in Antarctica where it was just lying around on the ice waiting to be found... well that is one of many yarns from NASA , like Moon Fountains and Moon Storms

Originally posted by seedofchucky
rename your thread to

Well the OP title got YOUR attention

I wonder if they have these on Mars...



Or these..

Journalist hunts for acid-spitting Mongolian death worm
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Dont forget this "worm" seen on Mars



I know.. It looks incredible, probably fake, hoax whatever.

But a REAL debunking, besides some vague argumentation i did not have found yet.

Some say the voices have no delay. Thats not debunking thats not thinking.
Because it states it is an unmanned mission, therefore the people talking are watching the (delayed) video footage on earth and commenting on it as they see it
Second, if they were capable of doing this around 1968, why wouldn't they have a communications technique without delay as well?
And who had around those times the budget, the means and the will to fake something like this?
I do also find the ground color ands structure have a great resemblance to the Rover pics we got 30 years later. Was at that time the surface color and structure already known to us?
The fact the sky has color means they also knew already that Mars had an Atmosphere, was that also already known at the time?

The only real suspicious thing i see is that between the different flightpaths there seems to be some interference of the signal.

Anyway.. Worms, there is one at the end.

Originally posted by EartOccupant

But a REAL debunking, besides some vague argumentation i did not have found yet.

Some say the voices have no delay. Thats not debunking thats not thinking.
Because it states it is an unmanned mission, therefore the people talking are watching the (delayed) video footage on earth and commenting on it as they see it
Second, if they were capable of doing this around 1968, why wouldn't they have a communications technique without delay as well?
And who had around those times the budget, the means and the will to fake something like this?
I do also find the ground color ands structure have a great resemblance to the Rover pics we got 30 years later. Was at that time the surface color and structure already known to us?
The fact the sky has color means they also knew already that Mars had an Atmosphere, was that also already known at the time?

The only real suspicious thing i see is that between the different flightpaths there seems to be some interference of the signal.

Anyway.. Worms, there is one at the end.

edit on 19-6-2011 by EartOccupant because: More questions.

OK, how about this.
It takes light or radio waves between 3 minutes 3 seconds, and 22 minutes 38 seconds to travel from Earth to Mars. That's because the closest the planets come to each other is 55 million km, and the farthest is 401 million km.

The Soviet Union's Mars 2 lander was the first Earth based mission to reach the surface of Mars in 1973, but communication was lost within a minute after touchdown. Three other probes, Mars 3, Mars 5, and Mars 6, either crashed or failed to even enter the planet's atmosphere during the 1973 and 1975/76 windows.

Viking 1 and 2 were launched respectively in August and September 1975, each comprising an orbiter vehicle and a lander. Viking 1 landed in July 1976 and Viking 2 in September 1976. The Viking program ended in May 1983, after both landers had died.

In 1964, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory made two attempts at reaching Mars. Mariner 3 was launched on November 5, 1964, but the shroud encasing the spacecraft atop its rocket failed to open properly, and it failed to reach Mars. Three weeks later, on November 28, 1964, Mariner 4 was launched successfully on a 7½-month voyage to the red planet.

Mars Landers
Exploration of Mars.

And who had around those times the budget, the means and the will to fake something like this?

Any number of cheap Hollywood movie studios. What looks so extraordinary?

The only real suspicious thing i see is that between the different flightpaths there seems to be some interference of the signal.

How does a space probe change 'flight paths' like suggested in the video? Why would Russians be speaking English?

Originally posted by Illustronic


OK, how about this.
It takes light or radio waves between 3 minutes 3 seconds, and 22 minutes 38 seconds to travel from Earth to Mars. That's because the closest the planets come to each other is 55 million km, and the farthest is 401 million km.

The Soviet Union's Mars 2 lander was the first Earth based mission to reach the surface of Mars in 1973, but communication was lost within a minute after touchdown. Three other probes, Mars 3, Mars 5, and Mars 6, either crashed or failed to even enter the planet's atmosphere during the 1973 and 1975/76 windows.

Viking 1 and 2 were launched respectively in August and September 1975, each comprising an orbiter vehicle and a lander. Viking 1 landed in July 1976 and Viking 2 in September 1976. The Viking program ended in May 1983, after both landers had died.

In 1964, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory made two attempts at reaching Mars. Mariner 3 was launched on November 5, 1964, but the shroud encasing the spacecraft atop its rocket failed to open properly, and it failed to reach Mars. Three weeks later, on November 28, 1964, Mariner 4 was launched successfully on a 7½-month voyage to the red planet.

Mars Landers
Exploration of Mars.

And who had around those times the budget, the means and the will to fake something like this?

Any number of cheap Hollywood movie studios. What looks so extraordinary?

The only real suspicious thing i see is that between the different flightpath there seems to be some interference of the signal.

How does a space probe change 'flight paths' like suggested in the video? Why would Russians be speaking English?

Tnx for taking the time to answer my questions.

I do not disagree with all your points, but that still does not debunk the video IMHO.

If it was a secret operation, it could be from an international organization of some kind, in wich different nationalities work together. So that could explain the different backgrounds/voices/accents.

The delay for vid or radio does not tell me anything. If the groundcrew reacts at the time they SEE the vid there is no delay at the recording!

And IF it is a secret operation, i don't see how the providing of mission details of known operations is relevant. Also, those missions you describe are after the alleged date of 1968, so how did they know there was an atmosphere? The colors and texture of the surface? Mariner 4 only flew past it and took a few black and White pictures from-out space. EDIT: It seems Mariner 4 did take color pictures.

Still, don't get me wrong, I also highly doubt if this could be real, but real evidence against it i still have not seen.

A starter would be the original "cheap movie" were this fragment comes from.

Originally posted by Illustronic
Any number of cheap Hollywood movie studios. What looks so extraordinary?

I always love how debunkers use mainstream fact to debunk secret mission

Actually this Mars film is from "Alternative 3" That is old news

How does a space probe change 'flight paths' like suggested in the video?

Using vector jets... the same way our satellites change flight paths when needed today. not really that hard

During a space race of what advantage would it be to suppress a successful mission, especially if it was the first successful landing on Mars? I mean, that's what they were racing to do, to be first.

Originally posted by EartOccupant
A starter would be the original "cheap movie" were this fragment comes from.

Okay

Alternative 3

Google Video Link

A British TV documentary that was supposedly based on real facts

OH BTW scientists are still disappearing or dying under mysterious circumstances. I have a very long list.

reply to post by zorgon


Tnx! I enjoyed that!

Well, it did have a worm

Why must these Mars threads always contain lame attempts at humour.Childish and a sinister way to derail a thread.

The cauldron of truth will boil over one day.

When I was younger I worked at a golf course, I was a spray tech and had to suit up to treat the greens with a deadly chemical, to kill nematodes just under the surface. This, solidifies my assumptions that we don't know jack, yet about life on other planets. Let alone our planet. Life isn't necessary little green men, They could be life forms we haven't even dreamed of.

We have life forms on this planet that live in harsh conditions, humans couldn't. Deep in the ocean and such.

The worms can handle high temperature and reproduce asexually, according to the account published in the journal Nature . They feed on subsurface bacteria, previously thought to be the only organisms found that deep, and were found in what carbon-14 dating shows is 3,000 to 12,000-year-old palaeometeoric water. National Geographic said there were signs of the worm as deep as 2.2 miles. Prior to the discovery roundworms were not known to live below dozens of feet. Read more: 'Worms from Hell' Found Two Miles Deep in Earth.

Worms from Hell

Thanks for posting.
Star and Flag