It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One study asked heterosexal men how comfortable and anxious they are around gay men. Based on these scores, they then divided these men into two groups: men that are homophobic, and men who are not. These men were then shown three, four minute videos. One video depicted straight sex, one depicted lesbian sex and one depicted gay male sex. While this was happening, a device was attached to the male participant's penises. This device has been found to be triggered by sexual arousal, but not other types of arousal (such as nervousness, or fear - arousal often has a very different meaning in psychology than in popular usage).
When viewing lesbian sex and straight sex, both the homophobic and the non-homophobic men showed increased penis circumference. For gay male sex, however, only the homophobic men showed heightened penis arousal.
Heterosexual men with the most anti-gay attitudes, when asked, reported not being sexually aroused by gay male sex videos. But, their penises reported otherwise.
Homophobic men were the most sexually aroused by gay male sex acts.
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
(Click here to read the study)
I'm not sure what to believe, could it have been a false positive?
This makes a heck of a lot more sense then gay bashers being gay I don't get why they even participated in the study? I enjoy girl on girl as much as anybody, but guy on guy
Originally posted by alfa1
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
(Click here to read the study)
I'm not sure what to believe, could it have been a false positive?
How are we to take you seriously when you yourself obviously havnt read the original study?
The authors themselves offer an alternate explanation.
'anxiety has been shown to enhance arousal and erection,' and so it is also possible that 'a response to homosexual stimuli [in these men] is a function of the threat condition rather than sexual arousal per se. These competing notions can and should be evaluated by future research.'
Originally posted by JustinSee
just remember that pedophelia is not the same as homosexual.
Originally posted by jupiter869
Is this REALLY a surprise to anyone?
Particularly all those homophobes out there?
Shakespeare said it best: "Methinks the lady doth protest too much."