Christian Fundamentalist Checklist.

By authorities shooting it out, you are referring to the Godless men that use religion to their advantage. This is duplicity as I have outlined before. These men and women in leadership can be traced to Theosophy and occult magic in most cases. This has nothing to do with the narrow path described by Christ. Know them by their fruit. All of what is stated in the prophecies of the Bible are taking place currently. We are on the leading edge of the tribulation time. I would estimate a month or two away from the 10 kings gaining power. Need proof?

"Then I stood on the sand of the sea.
And I saw a Beast (Satan’s Antichrist)
rising up out of the sea,
having seven heads and ten horns,
and on his horns ten crowns,
(other prophecies tell us these represent nations in Europe)
and on his heads a blasphemous name . . .
The dragon (Satan) gave him his power,
his throne, and great authority." (Rev 13:1,2)

The seven heads is the Vatican. The European WEU was just desolved in place of "The Ten" nations states that will rule Europe. The remaining member states will have a voice, but "The Ten" will rule. This is the beginning of the revived Roman Empire. LINK

Originally posted by bogomil
reply to post by SuperiorEd

 

You wrote:

["You confuse the ignorance of men with the truth that God presents. It takes time to catch up to God's intent for man. We are children now and men later. It takes the education."]

For sure. AUTHORITY always knows best.

Unfortunately competing 'authorities' eventually end up with shooting it out, with the risk of blowing this planet to bits. A bit less guru'ism and more 'live and let live' would work real miracles.

reply to post by SuperiorEd


You wrote:

["By authorities shooting it out, you are referring to the Godless men that use religion to their advantage."]

No, I actually also include those men over-brimming with various 'gods'. To settle that question: Do you have a 'godometer' for precise measurements? If that is the case, where can I get one; it could be convenient.

Quote: ["These men and women in leadership can be traced to Theosophy and occult magic in most cases."]

Choosing between the various self-proclaimed 'true' perspectives, this world seems to be exclusively made up of 'bad guys'. A horrifying thought.

Quote: ["This has nothing to do with the narrow path described by Christ."]

Not considered from circular premises, no.

Quote: ["Know them by their fruit."]

And such fruit-evaluations are done objectively, I presume (I here refer to standard objectivity, not the in-official versions).

Quote: [" All of what is stated in the prophecies of the Bible are taking place currently."]

Which undoubtly are true THIS time (after the 40 previous mistakes).

Quote: ["We are on the leading edge of the tribulation time. I would estimate a month or two away from the 10 kings gaining power. Need proof?"]

No proof required. I'll just hang around and wait.

reply to post by bogomil

["These men and women in leadership can be traced to Theosophy and occult magic in most cases."]

Choosing between the various self-proclaimed 'true' perspectives, this world seems to be exclusively made up of 'bad guys'. A horrifying thought.

I rationalize my beliefs based on evidence for faith in God. From what I have witnessed, you are rationalizing based on bias against God. Where is your evidence? You have never, in all our conversations, presented context against God apart from the incredulity of simply dismissing the claim. As I have said before, provide some context.

reply to post by SuperiorEd


You wrote:

["I rationalize my beliefs based on evidence for faith in God."]

It would be hard to deny that, especially if 'rationalize' is a key-word.

Quote: ["From what I have witnessed, you are rationalizing based on bias against God."]

Have you forgotten, that I'm a secular pastafarian. Stretching semantics a bit (I believe, you'll be understanding on that point) I'm a sometimes theist. Actually....or at least almost.

Quote: ["Where is your evidence?"]

I take it, that you with evidence refer to an imagined ANTI-theist position on my part as an expression of 'gnostic' atheism. My real position is, that 'gods' of any kind mainly belong in churches or private homes, and when free speech is used for promoting said 'gods' publicly, free speech is used in opposition.

Quote: [" You have never, in all our conversations, presented context against God apart from the incredulity of simply dismissing the claim."]

Why should I present a context AGAINST 'god'? I have an agnostic position concerning the god-concept. You may consider, that I have motives outside strictly theological grounds.