It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
reply to post by Maslo
Effectively that would mean that we would be able to see future events everywhere on earth, 0,07 seconds ahead of time......right? (using the maximum distance of 22.000 km) Of course the closer you would get to the location of the event the less time you would have......right??
Cool article and nice find...
Peace
Lockheed Martin, a main US defence contractor, thinks it can exploit research on the fringes of theoretical physics to build the ultimate radar, which could see through anything, from buildings to solid earth.
The company has designed and patented a scanner based on the principle of quantum entanglement - a far out concept, even by the weird standards of the quantum world. It says the device could penetrate any type of defence, to identify hidden weapons and roadside bombs from hundreds of miles away.
European patent number EP1750145 describes "radar systems and methods using entangled quantum particles". It says such a device could "visualise useful target details through background and/or camouflaging clutter, through plasma shrouds around hypersonic air vehicles, through the layers of concealment hiding underground facilities, [and find] IEDs [improvised explosive devices], mines and other threats - all while operating from an airborne platform". It could also be mounted on a satellite.
In theory entangled particles could be used to reveal details of objects they have never interacted with. If one particle bumped into an aircraft its twin would react in the same way, even if it never left the laboratory. Work out a way to read that behaviour, and an image could be built up, even with no information being directly transmitted from the target.
Originally posted by Ghost375
It's the mechanism for "Remote Viewing." That thing that the CIA studied for 30 years.
Remote sensing is the acquisition of information about an object or phenomenon, without making physical contact with the object. In modern usage, the term generally refers to the use of aerial sensor technologies to detect and classify objects on Earth (both on the surface, and in the atmosphere and oceans) by means of propagated signals (e.g. electromagnetic radiation emitted from aircraft or satellites).
Remote viewing (RV) is the practice of seeking impressions about a distant or unseen target using paranormal means, in particular, extra-sensory perception (ESP) or sensing with mind. Scientific studies have been conducted, and although some earlier, less sophisticated experiments produced positive results, none of the newer experiments concluded with such results when under properly controlled conditions. The scientific community rejects remote viewing due to the absence of an evidence base, the lack of a theory which would explain remote viewing, and the lack of experimental techniques which can provide reliably positive results.[1] It is also considered a pseudoscience.[2]
Originally posted by justyc
Originally posted by Ghost375
It's the mechanism for "Remote Viewing." That thing that the CIA studied for 30 years.
not true.
remote sensing and remote viewing are two totally separate things.
remote sensing
Remote sensing is the acquisition of information about an object or phenomenon, without making physical contact with the object. In modern usage, the term generally refers to the use of aerial sensor technologies to detect and classify objects on Earth (both on the surface, and in the atmosphere and oceans) by means of propagated signals (e.g. electromagnetic radiation emitted from aircraft or satellites).
remote viewing
Remote viewing (RV) is the practice of seeking impressions about a distant or unseen target using paranormal means, in particular, extra-sensory perception (ESP) or sensing with mind. Scientific studies have been conducted, and although some earlier, less sophisticated experiments produced positive results, none of the newer experiments concluded with such results when under properly controlled conditions. The scientific community rejects remote viewing due to the absence of an evidence base, the lack of a theory which would explain remote viewing, and the lack of experimental techniques which can provide reliably positive results.[1] It is also considered a pseudoscience.[2]
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
reply to post by AusiAnarchist
Here you go.....
Peace
Originally posted by nynomatica
Hi Guys ,
About Remote-Sensing Quantum Hyperspace by Entangled Photon Interferometry
So what does this really mean (retorical) ?
When this theory is correct. It should be possible to build a device thats able to 'see' regions in space that arent in our lightcone. Lets assume that a star explodes at a distance of 640 lyrs. It takes 640 years for the light of this star to reach us. So the explosion can been seen after 640 years. With ´Remote-Sensing Quantum Hyperspace by Entangled Photon Interferometry ' it should be possible to see the explosion much earlier.
Quantum radar developed and patented by defense contractor Lockheed Martin.
hmmm... finally some reverse enginering results