Hydrogen Deep Freeze Technology and FM Hz Phasing

Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Frater210

 

No, a friend, ex military just said a whole bunch of stuff he knows. I won't name him, and I have no idea if the cold freeze depopulation is going to happen, but what he was saying, he couldn't make it up, he knows. Also love him alot. But this freaked me right out. I want more info on their hydrogen technolgy, deep freeze capacity for regions.

Appeal to authority by gullibility. He was pulling your leg.

Good, hell finally froze over.

As long as they just use it on the US, I'm fine with that.

Originally posted by Unity_99


I know they don't fossil fuels in black operations, so the power usage isn't really a concern.]

You know they don't what fossil fuels? Seems to be a verb missing there. I guess the black ops helicopters came in and stole it away.

reply to post by adeclerk


I love how the "dark" side gets stars, just a campaign of BS. My friends are good guys, and have real info. You may too, who knows. Just working on damage control, eh? I stopped reading after the first nonsense you posted by the way. May read later and write more, but unless someone is contributing to the info on this, I'm not interested in debating the put downs and skeptics and nonsense crowd.

Originally posted by adeclerk

Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by Frater210

 

No, a friend, ex military just said a whole bunch of stuff he knows. I won't name him, and I have no idea if the cold freeze depopulation is going to happen, but what he was saying, he couldn't make it up, he knows. Also love him alot. But this freaked me right out. I want more info on their hydrogen technolgy, deep freeze capacity for regions.

Appeal to authority by gullibility. He was pulling your leg.

You think eh, it took quite a while to have some of his family background come out, about a year of writing I'd say. I'm a good person, and can talk to nearly anyone, including black ops, in fact often feel their energy,its not typical energy, and can read them, who they are inside. I feel everyone needs to go home and have a good report card so I can be of assistance to anyone from anywhere, its a good thing. I have noticed that trend in quite a few of my online friends, and have never worried about it, just send them lots of love, and mean it. He's for real.

Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by adeclerk

 

I love how the "dark" side gets stars, just a campaign of BS. My friends are good guys, and have real info. You may too, who knows.

Just working on damage control, eh? I stopped reading after the first nonsense you posted by the way. May read later and write more, but unless someone is contributing to the info on this, I'm not interested in debating the put downs and skeptics and nonsense crowd.

edit on 9-6-2011 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)

So your mind is closed to the evidence against your fantastical story, but open to the evidence for it? That sucks, seeing as how there is no evidence for it. Nothing you said had any basis in fact, with the exception of the word hydrogen.

reply to post by adeclerk


Dear one, what I see is this, if we were to analyze this as a pre-crime scenairo, we have as possible aready: Method ---check---yes, possible!
Means ---check----yes, possible!
Motive----check----yes, for the dark side, possible!

Logic, its there. Do I trust my friend is connected as he says based on all the particulars in his case, the reams of techno intellgent and black op things he has shared as a engineer with military training, yes!! You can't fake this and he's too geniune!

So what you have is your opinion its not happening, no proof its not true, and just put downs, but I'm not supposed to suggest that is bullying and nonsense.

Wrong girl, yes I will.

In addition, this thread stands without the msn consveration I had, for as analysis of a potential pre-crime disaster, connecting with tons of evidence of other weather hijacking phenomena, its more possible than tons of the nonsense they peddle half the time. For me the added in put from one friend, and the subtle nudges and drips of info from another all add up to making it even more probable.

Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by adeclerk

 

Dear one, what I see is this, if we were to analyze this as a pre-crime scenairo, we have as possible aready: Method ---check---yes, possible!

What is the method? A google search turns up no research on the subject. None of what is stated can even be verified as real.

Originally posted by Unity_99
Means ---check----yes, possible!

Without method there are no means. So, no.

Originally posted by Unity_99
Motive----check----yes, for the dark side, possible!

Right, somehow I've forgotten exactly why the government would want to kill the taxpayers that allow it to exist. Hmmm.

Originally posted by Unity_99
Logic, its there. Do I trust my friend is connected as he says based on all the particulars in his case, the reams of techno intellgent and black op things he has shared as a engineer with military training, yes!!

You're trusting someone over the internet based on an appeal to authority and your lack of understanding of physics and technology?

Originally posted by Unity_99
So what you have is your opinion its not happening, no proof its not true, and just put downs, but I'm not supposed to suggest that is bullying and nonsense.

No, what YOU have is the BURDEN OF PROOF. You make a fantastical claim, you should have the fantastic evidence to support it.

You don't.

You have no evidence to support it is happening.
You have no evidence to support it has been tested.
You have no evidence to support it is possible.
You have no evidence it has been investigated.
You have no evidence there is motive.
You have no evidence there is a means by which this can happen.

You have nothing but fantastic "skunkworks" claims.

reply to post by adeclerk


The very small amount of info posted, SHOWS METHOD. Don't talk to me, or anyone on ATS as if we are idiots who don't see through all the lies.

There are chemtrails.

HAARP is for real as a weapon, and that technology is used around the world in bases.

FUKUSHIMA AND BP WERE CRIMES.

You failed to convince me, of the employer group.

The surface technology can do it, with what is released about Russia, hydrogen freezing for bodies, and the known weapons, it wouldn't take much more in military hands.

METHOD ----CHECK!
MEANS---CHECK!
MOTIVE---CHECK!/b]

Don't talk to one who already has seen under the radar, because you're wasting your breath. But most here on ATS aren't the common folk watching the media either!

edit on 9-6-2011 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)

@adeclerk

No, what YOU have is the BURDEN OF PROOF. You make a fantastical claim, you should have the fantastic evidence to support it.

You don't.

You have no evidence to support it is happening.
You have no evidence to support it has been tested.
You have no evidence to support it is possible.
You have no evidence it has been investigated.
You have no evidence there is motive.
You have no evidence there is a means by which this can happen.

You have nothing but fantastic "skunkworks" claims.

That is where all the skeptics and controllers are so wrong. WE THE PEOPLE are the EMPLOYERS, and we don't have to have reams of scientists and thousands of scientific papers, we can trust the info we wish, and demand disclosure of everything.

The real onus is the other side, not mine. And that will always be the truth, no matter how many are fooled into the other lesser position.

It doesnt fool me.

Complete logic, and I don't have to prove a thing, I think they do, and they'd start by handing every single file in existence in public domain or anything that has tax payers dollars in it. We'll have our own experts look through all the militiary, paramilitary, govenment, cia, fbi files ourselves, because the Employers SUSPECT the criminal activities of the employees.

reply to post by Unity_99


So now you have made your claim unfalsifiable, you do realize that making your claim unfalsifiable defies logic and essentially invalidates it, yeah?

Originally posted by Unity_99
The very small amount of info posted, SHOWS METHOD. Don't talk to me, or anyone on ATS as if we are idiots who don't see through all the lies.

That 'info' you posted only shows that someone you know through the internet is imaginative, and you are gullible.

Originally posted by Unity_99
There are chemtrails.

There's no evidence to support them, so I'll have to say you're wrong.

Originally posted by Unity_99
HAARP is for real as a weapon, and that technology is used around the world in bases.

Nope, read about HAARP's actual power here.

Originally posted by Unity_99
FUKUSHIMA AND BP WERE CRIMES.

They don't fit the definition of crimes, so I have to disagree. How conservatives wanted to deal with the situations were the crimes!

Originally posted by Unity_99

The surface technology can do it, with what is released about Russia, hydrogen freezing for bodies, and the known weapons, it wouldn't take much more in military hands.

They freeze bodies with liquid nitrogen, your information isnt accurate. "It wouldn't take much more" is a nice opinion.

Originally posted by Unity_99
METHOD ----CHECK!
MEANS---CHECK!
MOTIVE---CHECK!/b]

Nope, Nope, Nope. Citation needed!

Originally posted by Unity_99

Don't talk to one who already has seen under the radar, because you're wasting your breath. But most here on ATS aren't the common folk watching the media either![

Holier than thou without evidence. Gotcha.

BTW: without the MSM you wouldn't even know about BP or Fukushima!

reply to post by adeclerk


You're the one who comes on with but an opinion and actually resorts to put downs. I wrote an Op in two posts, so perhaps you should reread.

I've already encountered nearly ever skeptics opinions on a variety of subjects even some where I have seen with my own eyes, and know what they're about.

Add to the value of the thread. I asked for those with info to come on, for its tough digging for trails in black op tech. I would even now, appeal to the heart and wisdom that exists within each person, to pull away from following bad orders and stand in the light white squares and reveal at least some of what you know. Stand with humanity.

There is a logical assumption and a direct message told me last night. Substance, and possibility! Probable, I think there is a likelihood alright with other odd remarks sent me, and the cold weather, and with their lack of hesitation to kill/harm and enslave.

As an employer, suspicions of wrong doing should be enough, we need counsels of citizens formed with teeth, to get the documents and study them all.

Nuremburg trials was something I wrote a big paper on, and the unique circumstances of proving guilt where simplified. The documents were deemed crimes against humanity and genocide. There were signatures on them.

So, do you have any info you've been hanging on to, feeling overburdened with guilt concerning anything? Would you like to be a hero for a day and share some?

reply to post by Unity_99


Yes, I feel guilty that a gullible individual might read your OP and become afraid.

You know, the type who believes in chemtrails, where evidence means nothing to them.

What use is it arguing with you when you don't even require evidence on a subject to make a post about it!?

Originally posted by Unity_99The info on basic phasing I believe, as I've seen phasing in action. Being semi transparent, even disappearing. This is technology apparently that can be deployed at important locations politically or military bases, and with their black ops as well, a kind of FM transmitter that is directed to the ground and creates a shield from chemtrails and nuclear or hazards, they will bend around and flood into the farms and citizens dwellings instead.

Also, this phasing, can be used to induce a different frequency range, so the paramilitary or generals can have bullets pass through them and not affect them at all.

Interesting... I have heard of something similar elsewhere...

Back when I was about 14, something I had built did something I'd classify as odd. The circuit was simple: the DC-DC inverter salvaged out of an old xenon timing light, and one of those hoop-shaped UHF television antennas. I hooked the inverter to 12 volts DC from a wall adapter, and connected the high voltage/high frequency secondary to the two leads on the hoop. Surprisingly, the crude device didn't short out and go up in a fireball; and I could hear the inverter make a faint "whining" sound from the transformer laminations vibrating.

Somewhere along the line, I got the bright idea to stick something inside the loop and see what (if anyhthing) would happen - I expected at most some magnetic oddity. So I suspended an ordinary steel paper clip in the exact center of the ring with fine sewing thread, and plugged the circuit in. The paper clip developed a faint blue glow around it, and about ten or fifteen seconds in, IT VANISHED, leaving the sewing thread dangling free. Where did it go?

What makes this so odd? It's that when I reversed the polarity of the hoop (by doing the 'ol switcheroo of the two high voltage leads) and repowered the thing, the paper clip reappeared on the thread amidst a faint blue corona like it had the first time around. The paper clip appeared to be intact, and did not change temperature or exhibit any obvious metallurgical changes.

Yes, the technology does exist and it seems to be based on what I think to be a "vibrating electromagnetic field". By "vibrating electromagnetic field" I don't mean a change of polarity, power level (volts, watts, etc.), or resistance. What I mean is an actual vibrating field!

Anyone hear of Micheal "Madman" Marcum? He had a similar experience with this type of effect. If you look up the setup between the two there is only one correlation: a transformer or more precisely, something the transformer is doing.

What is the transformer doing? I think I have a phrase for it: "Vibrating Pulse Inductance"

Imagine two inducting plates close to each other. Now imagine a pulsed dc source on one of them. Imagine the secondary inducting plate is connected to a field transmitter of some sort. Now imagine rapidly vibrating the source induction plate. Think about what is going to happen to that pulsed inducting field.

Think, the pulsing back and forth of the inducting field, the rapidly vibrating induction plate, what do you see happening to the field? That's right, the shape of the field is changing with each pulse isn't it

Now imagine a conductive object is subject to that field. You see the object physically doesn't move, but its field is vibrating. What if that vibration is similar or higher in frequency than visible light? What is light? A vibrating electromagnetic field right? So what happens to light when interacting with such a field? Would it just go right through?

What other thing has humanity created that can both be still and be vibrating at the same time? That's right, a Bose–Einstein condensate.

What is the concept of a bose-einstein condensate connected to, right again... QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT

Is your mind blown? Mine is

reply to post by USAisdevil


Cheers man. I'll have a look.

Originally posted by ElzonWhat if that vibration is similar or higher in frequency than visible light?

Light is 400-790Thz, so you want to vibrate a metal plate at 1000 THz? That would be interesting

Originally posted by Uncinus

Originally posted by ElzonWhat if that vibration is similar or higher in frequency than visible light?

Light is 400-790Thz, so you want to vibrate a metal plate at 1000 THz? That would be interesting

edit on 9-6-2011 by Uncinus because: (no reason given)

Whoops, your right

Getting the field to vibrate at those frequencies would actually create light, not just let it pass through it

But, nevertheless if you give an object a vibrating electromagnetic field you can get light to go right through it

Just like a laser beam going through radio waves without any significantly detectable effect.

And if you make the field resonant to the object's overall quantum frequency you could possibly get a non-quantum object to go through it with no effect.

Originally posted by Elzon
But, nevertheless if you give an object a vibrating electromagnetic field you can get light to go right through it

Just like a laser beam going through radio waves without any significantly detectable effect.

which one of those 2 qualifies as an "object"??

Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul

Originally posted by Elzon
But, nevertheless if you give an object a vibrating electromagnetic field you can get light to go right through it

Just like a laser beam going through radio waves without any significantly detectable effect.

which one of those 2 qualifies as an "object"??

Vibrating electromagnetic fields don't seem to interact with each other and the object in question is the one being given a vibrating electromagnetic field. In essence you take a normal everyday object and turn it into a quantum object so that light can go right through. Therefore you create an object with a "quantum field." A quantum field that permeates the entire object.

All these things have been done before, they just haven't really been done in a macro environment.