"The Undefeated,"Palin’s Record Takes Center Stage

reply to post by sweetliberty


Actually I am not campaigning for her either, just would like to see a more balanced approach and access to information made know to those who think she is an idiot,

“Those with the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening.”

people open your eyes

the only reason you hate palin and hate on her is becaome of the vast left wing social media programming machine.

god forgid someone has a critical thought of the "hate" of palin and question the origin or intentions of those actions.

when people attack the woman anyone who can critical think what is it they are so afraid of? why do the insesantly go after and attack and attack and attack her personally and the message she brings to the discussion.

its a classic attack the left wing uses time and time agian and its right out of saul alinskys playbook attack and marginize to discredit the woman and her message.

they fear the woman and yeah god forbif someone even utter the words for a smaller government and god forgid we as american take personal responsibilty for our actions or inactions.

palin is not even a threat all the attacks are to clear the 2012 field to ensure an obama victory and people you are playing right into their hands.

8 years of bush attacks by the left wing social programming machines only purpose was to get into power and they suceeded and yes bush did some stupidity but the stupidity was nothing near the level that left wanted you to think it was.

truth doesnt matter only the percepted reality of what their messages is to get and keep and maintain power.


really what it all boils down is that you and me and we all are politcal pawns the left plays their part hook line and sinker and the right buy it hook line and sinker.

think not? the left palin is stupid! the right no palins not!

what it all boils down to is it boils down to a d and r by their names.

if palin was a leftie the left would love her just like pelosi if you really want to talk about intelligence.

billions of dollars go into this country for smear campaigns because that is a political tool that creates a division and that division a means to control you.

anyhow thats my take

Originally posted by hawkiye
reply to post by anon72

 

I would venture to say Ron Paul has been attacked and ridiculed as much as her.

Your venturing is correct

Oh wait.... I thought you said Paul Ryan....
but you are correct about Ron Paul

I still haven't listened to all of this,
www.ustream.tv...

has anyone?

Also I think we all need to see the documentary.

Her record in Alaska is available, not much anyone doesn't know about her.

reply to post by neo96

really what it all boils down is that you and me and we all are politcal pawns the left plays their part hook line and sinker and the right buy it hook line and sinker.

Absolutely and thanks for posting

I have spent an enormous amount of time and energy researching politics.

I don't want to be found with blood on my hands, this is probably the most important election in out nations history, everyone should be worried,

IMHO we have one last chance to get this right.

Originally posted by neo96
anyhow thats my take

edit on 8-6-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)

And my honest take is that it is a made-to-order propagandist film..

the films Director

Bannon, 57, a graduate of Benedictine High School who now sits on its board, said he was approached by Palin's political-action committee and asked to make short vignettes about Palin. He told the committee he wanted to make a feature-length documentary instead.

www2.timesdispatch.com...

It is curious how the far right claims the mainstream media is propaganda complete with Glen Beck conspiracy diagrams, but when the Palin PAC goes and contracts clear propaganda posing as a film - hurray! It's just an unbiased accounting of how everyone got the facts wrong about her.

reply to post by Stormdancer777


we all know its a game

but to turn to apathy and not participate when we have the chance of our words to be heard

and if they somehow makes someone take pause and rethink and reevalute what they are being told

i consider that somewhat of a victory

but to site back and do nothing and there would be blood on our hands.

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by sweetliberty

 

Actually I am not campaigning for her either, just would like to see a more balanced approach and access to information made know to those who think she is an idiot,

“Those with the most to lose did the least to prevent its happening.”

edit on 013030p://bWednesday2011 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)

Did you hear that Joy Behar defended Sarah to Barbara Walters on The View a few days ago

Do you think the MSM could have found something serious or inspirational to cover instead of this?

I don't see you campaigning for her, I see you are fed up with attacks on people. Many of those talking heads can not hold a debate without emotion.
It's one thing to disagree and to debate using facts but it's another to destroy regardless of facts or anything else. They make it personal and they don't quit until total annihilation.... even if it means attacking their children. To them it's personal!

I would not want Hillary's daughter humiliated anymore then I would want anyone's child smeared. The MSM and talking heads are out of control and should be fined (*wishful thinking)

reply to post by neo96

but to site back and do nothing and there would be blood on our hands.

I understand.

reply to post by Indigo5


to point out propaganda of just one side is disingenous

how many films by al gore and michael moore? all with a leftist propaganda.

george soros a left wing billion funding media matters,huffington post and a myriad of others.

and your arguement is glenn beck for one news station.

when the vast left wing social media machine teachs and entertians this nations youth telling them what to think.


beck only reaches a few million the left reaches 10s of millions if not hundreds.


god forbid that someone has the freedom of thought or speech.

really this reminds me of the fascist nazis burning books

books are dangerous books are propaganda and they got rid of them.


attacking beck and fox is acting like a nazi because people dont stop they want them taken off the air.


the only message that can be uttered is what they tell you what someone elses cant be heard.

reply to post by sweetliberty


I saw Joy said that, wild.

I can respect that, when a person even though they don't agree with them politically will take the high road.

The MSM and talking heads are out of control

I am really worried, actually, I think the hatred that is aimed towards Palin is dangerous, I really worry about her safety and that of her family.

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Indigo5

 

to point out propaganda of just one side is disingenous

how many films by al gore and michael moore? all with a leftist propaganda.

And pointing to those examples excuses this how?

If you are saying that this is the same as a Michael Moore film, OK then why champion it? I am not a Michael Moore fan.

If you are simply employing the false partisan logic that because a Democrat steals we should turn a blind eye to Republicans stealing. I am not a fan of that trash logic either.

This film is made-to-order propaganda. I am pretty sure that there have been sufficient threads on Michael Moore and Al Gore's films to flesh out the truth there as well, but in the meanwhile, I will stick to the OP as what you posted seems irrelevant. No offense.

really this reminds me of the fascist nazis burning books

books are dangerous books are propaganda and they got rid of them.


attacking beck and fox is acting like a nazi because people dont stop they want them taken off the air.

I like that Fox is on the air. I like when Palin speaks. It gives people the opportunity to evaluate their credibility. We should be a nation of transparent discourse.
Sunshine is the best dissaffectant.

It seems that you have resorted to infering I am a Nazi for pointing out the truth that Sarah Palin's PAC recruited the Director to make this film? Seems a bit ironic, but in keeping with other postings I have seen from fringe conservatives when they are confronted with an "inconvenient truth".

Just thought I would throw that in there for you seeing as you are an AG fan

reply to post by Indigo5


no offense was meant or taken

however

This film is made-to-order propaganda. I am pretty sure that there have sufficient threads on Michael Moore and Al Gore's films to flesh out the truth there as well, but in the meanwhile, I will stick to the OP as what you posted seems irrelevant. No offense.

do post those links so we call all see how they flushed out the "truth"

reply to post by sweetliberty


1. Mean spirited, her use of guns, bulls eye targets, conservative.
2. TPTB - Bilderbergs, Club of Rome, UN, Corporate business,

I fall in the middle politically and frankly she scares me. I detested her response after the Gifford shooting. However, I have no doubt that both the Republican and Democrat candidates for President will be beholden to this set agenda. If Sarah Palin is not, I may very well consider supporting her. Perhaps we can all find a candidate that does not appear to have any connections?

reply to post by WhoKnows100

Perhaps we can all find a candidate that does not appear to have any connections?

Are you indicating Palin is connected to the main power brokers? Hmmmm.

I sure hope not. What do they treat people like that aren't connected to them?

I bet is she was one she wishes she wasn't connect now.

reply to post by neo96


Deflection. You want to debate Al Gore in this thread? Is this how you typically operate?

reply to post by Antiquated1

She is only right about Revere when you forget her answer.

Sigh.
I'd suggest you tell that to the Historian's who say agree with her, some begrudgingly but they respect the truth more than an agenda to destroy another person at the price of distorting history.

reply to post by Indigo5

Deflection. You want to debate Al Gore in this thread? Is this how you typically operate?

Deflection, You want to debate Neo96 in this thread? Is this how you typically operate?

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Indigo5

 

Deflection. You want to debate Al Gore in this thread? Is this how you typically operate?

Deflection, You want to debate Neo96 in this thread? Is this how you typically operate?

Would you care to comment on the fact that Sarah Palins PAC found and recruited this director and asked him to make a film?

Maybe you can comment without a discussing Al Gore or Nazis seeing as this thread is dedicated to the Palin film?

reply to post by WhoKnows100

1. Mean spirited, her use of guns, bulls eye targets, conservative.

Mean spirited: Do you think a portion of that might be because she had to adapt and survive from being attacked from all sides?
Is a woman considered "mean spirited" because she is hanging in there, in a predominately mans world?

her use of guns: Did she kill anyone, threaten anyone with a gun? I mean human not animals.

bulls eye targets: that is so petty, do you really really need me to go there?

conservative: What does conservative mean to you? Why do you detest conservatism?

I think it means personal responsibility, limited government, moral values. Live and let live. To each their own.

I don't detest Progressives, Democrats, Independents, Conservatives, Liberals, Constitutional Conservative (me)... ect.

Actually those who think different than I do cause me become a better person intellectually. I also like the competition. I'm not saying I can compete very well but I love it when I have to think critically, losing that dumbed-down idle-mind I so embraced while living my run-of-the-mill single parent life.

Let me tell you, labels are sometimes needed for a starting point but labels are very deceptive and are hijacked.

2. TPTB - Bilderbergs, Club of Rome, UN, Corporate business,

Are you asking which one she might be working for?

I know it's crazy and getting crazier out there but I think if we listen to all the people (individually) who are running for office or are already in office, without listening to the commentary, we might be able to truly hear what they all have to say.
Sure many will lie to us in order to get elected but if we listen to all these immature talking heads (MSM and other commentary) we will not know what to think.

There is no reason to have to chose right now, we still have time and some might step up at the last minute.
I think we first have to chose to be proactive and not reactive. (something I'm working on, lol) in order to truly know what to think about them.
Good luck in your search, I think we all need it because the MSM is going to be as cut throat as never before.