It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by zatara
Truth can be strange. 'tis true.
But when making such incredible statements as "Japan was nuked. No 9.0 earthquake". Shouldn't one have something like, oh I don't know, incredible evidence? Nor should one ignore all the evidence that points to the fact that it was indeed a massive earthquake. Nor ignore the evidence, or lack thereof, that no nuclear explosion, other than the reactor itself, took place.
Not to mention, the anti-Israeli agenda of the website.
Sorry. One doesn't get to make up ones own truth.
Originally posted by ScepticDebunker
It wasnt a nuclear bomb...there would be nothing standing
Originally posted by Jassu
Originally posted by DragonRain311
reply to post by gekados
This may be slightly off topic, but I noticed something peculiar in the last few weeks, I have not seen a truly blue clear sky in months, I see the blue but it is almost like it is being covered by a thick fog, I live in London Ontario but the thing is that I have seen clear blue skies here before. (I only moved here 8 months ago) This is definitely troubling.
I live in Sudbury Ontario and although i have seen blue skies the weather has been a bit strange. Not necessarily hotter or colder but we are experiencing an extreme in storms. This may be just the time of year but its been a little more violent then years passed.
I don't believe this nuke nonsense though (unless it was covertly detonated underground, which wouldn't make much sense.) I remember the day it happened i did nothing but watch videos out of Japan of the quake and tsunami.
Reactor 4 is building 7, demolished by explosives. [爆発物によって破壊された] Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of it's internal stainless steel shroud, yet blew it's containment anyway. That is the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert, and cannot produce an explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure leaving it in danger of falling over. Overheated open fuel pools
That the destruction of the facility is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear weapons. [核兵器?] Hydrogen produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed. It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics that fit the "official" story. If hydrogen blew the place apart (still many times beyond impossible, even if sealed off), it should be laying around in large pieces, with very little dust. Dust is much of what you see in the wreckage at Fukushima.
Remember that this video is proof of what really went on. This means there never were significant aftershocks, never was a natural tsunami, and if they lied about that, what else? This video is pivotal and vital to exposing the truth. Sure there was a quake, but at this newsroom it was not much over a six if it even was a six. I chose this video because the news room is within eyeshot of station MYG012, which was used by the USGS to make these graphs which represent an 8.8, as was stated in this (English) newscast and was probably used as a guide to fudge the lie due to the closeness of the newsroom to the seismic station.
Take a look at these frame captures, and ask a question - Why is no one trying to run? Why are the cars all just parked peacefully as the tsunami arrived? Why was there no warning? Why did the tsunami sirens only go off after the tsunami arrived? Could it be that the people and the governement had not felt a significant earthquake and did not measure one either?
I challenge ANYONE to send me pictures of this quake showing me devastation in an area not hit by the tsunami. All we have, all the pictures are tsunami damage. Let's see pictures of quake damage. The Kobe quake was a 6.9/7.2 depending on source. That makes this quake, at a 9.0 100X as powerful. Sendai was near the epicenter and would have been devastated if it really happened. Look at the earthquake photos of damage from the Kobe quake, and try to find ONE THING SIMILAR in SENDAI. Just try. They do not exist. Outside of the tsunami, the quake which supposedly hit Sendai with many times the power of the one in Kobe, did not damage a single building there. Sendai was only 48 miles from the epicenter of this "9.0" which would have devastated everything in an area 1,000 miles across if it was real. All of Japan would be toast. Try to find a photo of seismic damage in Sendai. I challenge you. Try to find it in any of the coastal cities, as little as 25 miles from the "epicenter". I looked for 5 hours, and except for some tanks that fell at a brewery not a single one exists. No pictures of collapsed skyscrapers or high rises equals NO 9.0. You will not find a single skyscraper photo where the windows got broken either. You will find no downed power poles, no flipped over cars, no uprooted trees, no derailed trains (except for one the tsunami hit), and the road damage is typical of even a 5.0. You will not find pictures of a single damaged multi story building or even a structurally damaged wood framed house outside the tsunami zone. In Sendai the quake messed up grocery stores and kitchens and that really is about it.
Take a look at these frame captures, and ask a question - Why is no one trying to run? Why are the cars all just parked peacefully as the tsunami arrived? Why was there no warning? Why did the tsunami sirens only go off after the tsunami arrived? Could it be that the people and the governement had not felt a significant earthquake and did not measure one either?
Question: Why are none of the roads packed with people trying to flee the approaching tsunami? Could it be that the people and government were not expecting one? Tsunami sirens blare only when it arrives, rather than 40 minutes before, which is how much warning they would have had if a real quake in the ocean had been detected. Consider that. Parking lots full of cars, everyone at work, no one trying to leave. AMBUSH!!.
Originally posted by BlastedCaddy
Originally posted by Jassu
Originally posted by DragonRain311
reply to post by gekados
This may be slightly off topic, but I noticed something peculiar in the last few weeks, I have not seen a truly blue clear sky in months, I see the blue but it is almost like it is being covered by a thick fog, I live in London Ontario but the thing is that I have seen clear blue skies here before. (I only moved here 8 months ago) This is definitely troubling.
I live in Sudbury Ontario and although i have seen blue skies the weather has been a bit strange. Not necessarily hotter or colder but we are experiencing an extreme in storms. This may be just the time of year but its been a little more violent then years passed.
I don't believe this nuke nonsense though (unless it was covertly detonated underground, which wouldn't make much sense.) I remember the day it happened i did nothing but watch videos out of Japan of the quake and tsunami.edit on 7-6-2011 by BlastedCaddy because: (no reason given)
You know how many folks are saying that their weather has been crazy...I have friends all over the world and they all say the same thing.
edit on 7-6-2011 by BlastedCaddy because: Trigger happy and lost in the heat. These pretzels are making me thirsty.
Originally posted by ScepticDebunker
Its your video, its YOUR Youtube account your linking to.......its YOUR conspiracy, you have 0 proof.
It wasnt a nuclear bomb...there would be nothing standing
Originally posted by gekados
reply to post by seagull
Yes, brother. In my opinion there is a good probability that a 'small' nuclear warhead did all this, because it was detonated inside a nuclear reactor.
The consequences are visible worldwide. Three reactors melted down in the meanwhile, spreading radioactive clouds all over the planet. They will continue to burn for many months to come and the disaster's proportions are beyond imagination at this point. I really don't wanna say 'I told you so'.
I don't know who is directly responsible for all this, but it perfectly suits the elite's plan.
Peace!
Originally posted by seagull
reply to post by gekados
The explosion that "supposedly" did all this occured after the earthquake, because of damage sustained during the 'quake.
Altering the facts to fit your hypothisis isn't going to make it true.