It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by manontrial
The ancients knew and understood that the universe itself is a fully conscious entity, it is aware of all things at all times. Look for yourself, this is very true.
It is THIS concept that has been twisted, mis-interpreted and twisted again and again into this most ludicrous of idiotic ideas that there is some 'being' or 'god' out there somewhere and that somehow we humans are important.
We are not.
"god", as you call it, is nothing more than the universal consciousness that permeates everything, everywhere. It's the same thing that you feel and identify as your 'self'.
To think of a 'god' as in the god of christianity, judaism, islam etc is akin to believing in santa claus, tooth fairy, wrestling or mickey mouse.
Originally posted by TheInterceptor
i would describe god as absent. better yet, not real.
i would also describe god as mythological.
Originally posted by Caji316
If there is a GOD, you are it, or a part of it anyway....
Originally posted by AQuestion
This is really quite a simple question. It does not require you to be fully understanding, I don't believe we can fully understand anything, I do believe we can grow in our understanding of everything by sharing information, our little bit of knowledge. If you join this thread to tell me that there is no God then you are off topic. If you tell me you don't believe in God, you can remain on topic if you explain what you think he could be like.
Originally posted by readytorevolt
I dont think Im capable of understanding who or what "God" is. But I know I do not fear God and I dont think God would want me to
Originally posted by Golithion
It really depends on what view point you have, and which god you really are talking about. In it's simplest terms and I am speaking from an Archaeological stand point, a fertility god or something that derives meaning from creation. That's in it's simplest form IMO. Now if you extend it to me anyways it would be a being of greater intelligence that can create at will, think at will, allow and take away free will from his/her subjects, and resides in a higher state of being then mere mortal men and women. I hope that isn't too confusing but that is what I would say, other's would say, a being who is all of the above but is not active in men or women's lives. Hands off approach kind of like either a chess game, or a simulator in a way. Does that make sense hope so?
Originally posted by TheInterceptor
reply to post by AQuestion
Please explain how my views on god are not welcome in this thread.
you asked and i gave my honest feelings on the subject. do i need to subscribe to YOUR beliefs in order to post here?edit on 5-6-2011 by TheInterceptor because: correction
Originally posted by manontrial
reply to post by AQuestion
The rest of creation? Are you serious?
Ever heard of the big bang? Gravity? Time?
All it takes is time and gravity and the rest just follows. It does NOT take ome type of intelligence to form a planet or to form protiens together into molecules. Surely you understand this.
It is mathematically IMPOSSIBLE that this planet is the only one in the universe with complex life on it, or even in our galaxy. This planet is NOT special and neither are the organisms which live on it.
Try NOT believing so strongly in a fair tale that WAS written by humans. Ancient humans at that who had very little understanding of what they were seeing and feeling. What they wroe was allegories and concepts which have been misread, misinterpreted and very very twisted over time.
Don't take acient stories so literally.
Originally posted by Trueman
Originally posted by TheInterceptor
reply to post by AQuestion
Please explain how my views on god are not welcome in this thread.
you asked and i gave my honest feelings on the subject. do i need to subscribe to YOUR beliefs in order to post here?edit on 5-6-2011 by TheInterceptor because: correction
I think what he was trying to say is you can't post your opinion since you don't believe in God. This thread is asking for the way you see God, if you don't see God at all. In other words, this one is for believers...no offense.