It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by here4awhile
yeah...uh...who cares...I know she's stupid...but really...who cares...
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to post by CaptChaos
Yeah, yeah, yeah. That's just what I want in a POTUS. An undereducated Barbie. I REALLY did try for another word but that's all I could come up with. I can see it now. "Mr Putin, Palin is on the phone. What? No Sir. She still insists on calling you Stalin."
Originally posted by getreadyalready
The only way Obama gets re-elected is if he is running against any of the Republicans! What a worthless bunch of nincompoops they have put together to try and oppose Obama. I mean, Obama is basically a lame duck, he has no chance of re-election, but wait, oh it looks like the Republicans have decided to concede.
Originally posted by Ultraman2011
I know Democrats and Michael Moore fans get all giddy with this sort of stuff, bur really, why would you expect Sarah to be totally up to date on an 'on the spot" historical analysis of something that is so irrelevant to the here and now. I consider myself pretty well read and well versed, however, if someone thrust a microphone in my face and ask me to relate great details on the life of Sir John A. MacDonald (first PM of Canada) I wouldn't know much more than Sarah did on Paul Revere.
And, from what I've read, your students in the US can't even find Wash. DC on a map, don't seem to know France is a country, score at the bottom of the barrel in math and science test, and aren't sure what the Cold War was ...so really, not that big of deal in the grand picture.
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by Ultraman2011
I know Democrats and Michael Moore fans get all giddy with this sort of stuff, bur really, why would you expect Sarah to be totally up to date on an 'on the spot" historical analysis of something that is so irrelevant to the here and now. I consider myself pretty well read and well versed, however, if someone thrust a microphone in my face and ask me to relate great details on the life of Sir John A. MacDonald (first PM of Canada) I wouldn't know much more than Sarah did on Paul Revere.
And, from what I've read, your students in the US can't even find Wash. DC on a map, don't seem to know France is a country, score at the bottom of the barrel in math and science test, and aren't sure what the Cold War was ...so really, not that big of deal in the grand picture.
Oh, give me a break with that tired carp. Not everyone commenting about Ms. Palin's obvious stupidity is a Democrat or 'Michael Moore fan", and to claim so is quite the straw man.
Yeah, kinda like your President who thinks there are 56 States in his own country!
What did she just say? 'He was riding to warn us that our Freedoms were secure'? Holy carp!
If you can't recognize and admit to the total and utter incompetence displayed by this woman in this video (and many, many others) then you are seriously deep in the partisan spin.
She's a joke. On the people who support her. And she's laughing at YOU all the way to the bank.edit on 3-6-2011 by incrediblelousminds because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
I know! I know!
Originally posted by spinalremain
reply to post by Ultraman2011
Why would we expect Sarah Palin to know that stuff? To be up to date?
Perhaps it's because she is a representative of the Tea Party. I think that has a lot to do with it.