It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Proof: Station on MARS

page: 21
267
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 5 2011 @ 06:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Frira
 

Thanks, Frira. For what it's worth this is a good enough explanation for me.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I wouldn't normally add non-posts like this but unless you are a delusional nut-job can we leave this thread here and move on? Surely this is boring enough even for nut-jobs?

edit on 5/6/11 by Pimander because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 12:23 AM
link   
reply to post by smartbuddy
 


This could potentially be the site of a recent collision from a large interstellar object, well at least within the last few thousand years. Or maybe an interstellar object that had ice or something on it and the surface changed in response to the contact, or even overturned mars-dirt. I don't really have any experience in astronomy though the linear nature of the "thing" makes it a partially sensible explanation I suppose.



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 02:33 AM
link   
My lord.

People see the equation, see the result, know that everything fits every situation, nothing left to resolve. Sanity. Life as we know it.

People see the equation, but don't know the maths they are reading, nothing resolved. Insanity. Conspiracy as we know it.

One has educated people in their field.

The other has the internet and a hundred billion experts because they seen in once before, or studied ology at uni.

This counters the old adage 'A little knowledge is dangerous" and makes 'a little knowledge spread over a wide area is truth, and dangerous"



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 04:05 AM
link   



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 05:29 AM
link   
Its the Rebel Base
Great thx OP you let Darth find Luke



[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7eb0bd3aa2d5.jpg[/atsimg]


edit on 6-6-2011 by zazzafrazz because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 05:49 AM
link   
hi there

this is being reported in the MSM here in Portugal.

everyone seems to be taking it as `real ` proof ....odd.

thanks

snoopyuk



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 06:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by zazzafrazz
Its the Rebel Base
Great thx OP you let Darth find Luke



[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7eb0bd3aa2d5.jpg[/atsimg]


edit on 6-6-2011 by zazzafrazz because: (no reason given)


seeing as this in SKUNK I wanna ask you zazzy ..is that guy your lover?
raaaaaaaaaaaaar



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 06:57 AM
link   
This was on the front page recently, seems like it is pretty legit, but for some, even mainstream attention doesn't bring enlightenment........what would?????



news.ninemsn.com.au...



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 10:48 AM
link   
I don't come here often these days, but just wanted to let everyone know that this story/video is currently on the FRONT PAGE of Fox News website!

www.foxnews.com...



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 11:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Arrius
I don't come here often these days, but just wanted to let everyone know that this story/video is currently on the FRONT PAGE of Fox News website!

www.foxnews.com...


Beat me to it! I see that the news monkeys will print anything these days. This is news? It's probably just another hit piece on "conspiracy theorists" to ridicule them. Slow news day? Slam the CTs.



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 11:55 AM
link   
It was on Fox news. I usually don't believe anything they say. But what I find interesting, is the earliest MSM report was from June 4, by the Daily Mail. It is probably some kind of image error, but why hasn't NASA or Google released a statement about it? Why not give some explanation no matter how absurd or realistic it might be? Silence is never a good thing.

To say its pixilation is a bit farfetched in my opinion. Only because the previous images in this thread show a single line of pixilated blocks, when clearly, though blurry the image is, shows several blocks smaller and larger than each other. So I am not quite convinced yet.
edit on 6-6-2011 by DragonFire1024 because: add more



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 12:49 PM
link   
Interesting.

We need to be a little patient.

FOX News Link:: Armchair Astronomer Finds 'Evidence' of Life on Mars


A spokesman for NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab told FoxNews.com it was investigating the wild claims, speculating that "Bio Station Alpha" would most likely be determined to be a glitch in the digital imaging or an unusual feature on the surface of the planet -- and not a Martian base.

When it comes to aliens visiting Earth, I am a massive skeptic on the issue. If we as skeptics want to be taken seriously, we should investigate each case before saying, "wild claims". Since the conditions on Mars were rumored to be similar to Earth, the planet has so much potential for finding old human based civilizations. Sure, this could end up being a glitch, but there is a very-very high probability for discovery.

What are the chances for winds moving in the right direction, and something beneath the dirt and soil becomes uncovered?

Does Mars have life on it now? Most likely not.

Did Mars have life on it in the past? Who knows. "What if..." You know?

After being disappointed with NASA's new direction, I do not trust them with telling me the seven day forecast.

We really need to take human based space exploration seriously. Someday we are going to actually find something, and we will be sitting on our buts asking, "Why do we not have the capability to get there?"

Let us see what they have to say. Although this may end up being a glitch, I think it sparks our curiosity to think about things bigger than ourselves.

edit on 6/6/2011 by Section31 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 12:54 PM
link   
Agreed that this is simply missing data. "Move on people, nothing to see here"..



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 02:37 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 02:56 PM
link   
until we or someone ever goes to mars

no one can either prove or disprove that image

anything we say on here is just conjecture.



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 03:14 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 

Not conjecture.
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   
reply to post by smartbuddy
 


Good job bring this .to our attention..Thank you..Your story has made it on www.drudgereport.com



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 06:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by neo96
 

Not conjecture.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


So... this mean we find alien base camp? =)



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 06:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Davian

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by neo96
 

Not conjecture.
www.abovetopsecret.com...


So... this mean we find alien base camp? =)


No just means Humans just took a tragic left turn in logic and analytical thinking. And joined there fellow primates in the jungle beating on their breasts at the sight of another primate, "cutting his grass" as we say here in Oz.



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 06:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


OK - I need to learn more about longitude and latitude - I see how I was confusing them!
( I stand corrected on that specific point).

I also wanted to thank all the folks that have added additional images of Mars in the above
posts on this thread - they are really interesting
and I do agree that they appear to show anomalies.
I will save them and study them further with my trusty magnifyng glass!



new topics

top topics



 
267
<< 18  19  20    22  23  24 >>

log in

join