It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
NASA has been monitoring this comet for quite sometime now, and IN FACT, it has been effecting Earth since 1965 gravitationally. If it didn't exist why would NASA have diagrams of it's projectory on their Near Earth Objects data? It's real, it's very large, I've read some scientists depiction that it is one quarter the size of the moon, and others claiming it's as large as Jupiter.
Originally posted by w810i
Dude you are seriously grasping at straws! How many people do you think are active sky watchers? Rough ball park several million now as much news as this comet has gotten how many people do you think are out there actively looking for this comet? I'm willing to bet a bunch. A lot of these people aren't equipped with your average mead telescope either. They have some pretty good gear.
Now common sense is going to tell you that A. People are going to spot something odd about this comet if anything you were saying was remotely true. B. The governments of the world could not shut a million + people up about it no matter how hard they tried.
And you can't sit there and use people's videos being yanked from youtube as proof that they are being silenced. If all the sudden big name amateur astronomers were dying in mysterious accidents then that would be something
Use some common sense for Christ's sake.
Originally posted by DJW001
Where is your source for the statement that Brown Dwarf stars absorb light?
Black dwarf
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A black dwarf is a hypothetical stellar remnant, created when a white dwarf becomes sufficiently cool to no longer emit significant heat or light. Since the time required for a white dwarf to reach this state is calculated to be longer than the current age of the universe of 13.7 billion years, no black dwarfs are expected to exist in the universe yet, and the temperature of the coolest white dwarfs is one observational limit on the age of the universe.
The name black dwarf has also been applied to sub-stellar objects which do not have sufficient mass, approximately 0.08 solar masses, to maintain hydrogen-burning nuclear fusion.[7] These objects are now generally called brown dwarfs, a term coined in the 1970s.[8] Black dwarfs should not be confused with black holes or neutron stars.
Originally posted by curiouswa
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by curiouswa
.....this "comet" is only visible in the infrared.
That is false.
The Comet Elenin has been imaged, in visible light.
The man who discovered it saw it, in visible light.
Okay, show me an interview with Mr. Elenin or a paper of his discussing it. I will happily listen to it, but I do feel as those Mr. Elenin is hired by our government to state he found this "comet" (for a buy-off). I truly do not believe this is a "comet" due to the influence it has/had over other planets when aligned w/in our solar system.
Originally posted by karen61057
Seems to me that sense is not so common with Nibiru/ Brown Dwarf people.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by DJW001
Where is your source for the statement that Brown Dwarf stars absorb light?
Black dwarf
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A black dwarf is a hypothetical stellar remnant, created when a white dwarf becomes sufficiently cool to no longer emit significant heat or light. Since the time required for a white dwarf to reach this state is calculated to be longer than the current age of the universe of 13.7 billion years, no black dwarfs are expected to exist in the universe yet, and the temperature of the coolest white dwarfs is one observational limit on the age of the universe.
and from the same source further down the same page......
The name black dwarf has also been applied to sub-stellar objects which do not have sufficient mass, approximately 0.08 solar masses, to maintain hydrogen-burning nuclear fusion.[7] These objects are now generally called brown dwarfs, a term coined in the 1970s.[8] Black dwarfs should not be confused with black holes or neutron stars.
Notice the bolded text. I am not sure I agree with this explanation because I always believed a star collapsed on itself and formed a black hole, BUT since you appeared unaware of what a black/brown dwarf was I am giving you an explanation.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by karen61057
Seems to me that sense is not so common with Nibiru/ Brown Dwarf people.
Why are you one of those persons that continously confuses nibiru with nemesis?
Nibiru is said to be an orion planetoid and nemesis is said to be a brown dwarf star.
It is possible that nibiru orbits nemesis, and if nemesis enters our solar system then so does nibiru.
Its all speculation!
Originally posted by karen61057
But nowhere in that text does it say that a brown dearf absorbs light. It does say that is no longer emits light which is not the same thing as absorbing light. Everything absorbs light and everything reflects light. A blue shirt absorbs all the reds,yellows and greens and reflects back the blue. Absorbed and reflectied light is why we see color.edit on 1-6-2011 by karen61057 because: add clarification
Originally posted by karen61057
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by karen61057
Seems to me that sense is not so common with Nibiru/ Brown Dwarf people.
Why are you one of those persons that continously confuses nibiru with nemesis?
Nibiru is said to be an orion planetoid and nemesis is said to be a brown dwarf star.
It is possible that nibiru orbits nemesis, and if nemesis enters our solar system then so does nibiru.
Its all speculation!
I also confuse Chris Kringle and Santa Claus, doesnt make either one of them real.
A sub-stellar object – one that is intermediate in mass between a star and a planet; brown dwarfs (which are not really brown but a very dull red) are sometimes described as "failed stars" because they are not massive enough to have initiated hydrogen fusion (see hydrogen burning) in their cores.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by karen61057
But nowhere in that text does it say that a brown dearf absorbs light. It does say that is no longer emits light which is not the same thing as absorbing light. Everything absorbs light and everything reflects light. A blue shirt absorbs all the reds,yellows and greens and reflects back the blue. Absorbed and reflectied light is why we see color.edit on 1-6-2011 by karen61057 because: add clarification
Dark colors do not reflect much light, they primarily absorb it. That is why in the winter people wear dark colors to keep the heat within their bodies and in summer they wear lighter colors to reflect the heat off themselves.
Then add the fact that a black/brown dwarf does not emit light of its own because its a failed system, thus making it extremely difficult to spot with conventional telescopes. They use infrared scanners such as WISE to get better results.edit on 6/1/2011 by EarthCitizen07 because: sorry for the edit, too many beers lol
Originally posted by EyeHeartBigfoot
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by EyeHeartBigfoot
EXCUSE ME?
WoW!!! THIS IS NOT DENYING IGNORANCE, THIS IS DENYING CIVILITY
That post, that you replied to??? So, you saw fit to make such an annoying reply on THAT post of mine? And, you dared to call ME "uncivil"????
"WoW!!!", indeed...............................
I do not understand these sentence fragments and/or ramblings..
Some might consider poor sentence structure and incoherent ramblings:
a disservice to thinking, educated people everywhere.
As for ELENIN (whatever heavenly body you want to apply to it) C/2010 X1, your claiming that you know every fact about it's make-up, size, effects, trajectory and everybody else is uneducated?
No additional questions needed? Insults and attacks are a proper method of:
thinking, educated people everywhere.
But I have never attacked and insulted an OP over spelling and/or grammar.
At least those fragments are GOLD so they must be more important than a regular ATS Member's comments.
Great, can you provide an actual link to a WEEDWHACKER Thread that you created that states all this incredible knowledge?
Also, as a fellow ATS Member if such a thread exists I would high suggest you forward the data to every university in the world as I am pretty certain you would be offered quite a career.
That makes about as much sense as someone stating that a GOLD CONTRIBUTION LEVEL = Spamming, Obsessive/Compulsive Disorder and "PROOF" of absolutely zero life.
Now go run to the whoever and get my words removed using that GOLD status. First I would check to be certain you do not have a tungsten core.
Focus, and chose your words wisely as I do not like misdirection and having things taken out of context for the advancement of an ulterior motive. There just may be some thinking and educated ATS Members(please note the proper use or non-use of punctuation) reading others words.
I am an ATS Member and I want to read the future data the OP has assured us he will present.edit on 6/1/2011 by EyeHeartBigfoot because: Typo