It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Chemtrails 101

page: 13
18
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 11:41 PM
link   
reply to post by fleabit
 

It means that you are writing about all this stuff, but you are just some person on an Internet forum. I don't have access to any of this data. You could be making all this up for all I know.



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 11:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheRealMrX
reply to post by fleabit
 

It means that you are writing about all this stuff, but you are just some person on an Internet forum. I don't have access to any of this data. You could be making all this up for all I know.



Ever applied any of that same skepticism to those who promote chemtrails?



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 11:49 PM
link   
reply to post by firepilot
 

No, I don't engage in critical thinking. That is why I participate in this forum.



posted on Jun, 5 2011 @ 06:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by sonnny1

Originally posted by sonnny1

Originally posted by TheRealMrX
reply to post by sonnny1
 

I just gave you a 2000 lb. bunker busting bomb of truth, buddy. It's called Chemtrails 101!




Asking again.....................

I will ask you one question.
Why do they need to drop CHEMICALS onto the worlds population again with aircraft,especially if its even more convenient to do it out in the open ?

Still waiting......................




And waiting........................................



Why wont you answer the question TheRealMrX? Could it be you "know" the answer,but would force you to think critically?



posted on Jun, 5 2011 @ 09:39 PM
link   
reply to post by TheRealMrX
 


First let's get this straight Chemtrails have nothing to do with Alzheimers. I know this since I have a personal experience with this sad disease. My grandfather had it as did a close friend of mines parents yes both of them and we were 12 years old at the time. I am 40 now so do some math and guess what chemtrails were not even real then and they are not real now and I challenge you to show scientific evidence to prove me wrong.

Now a bit of education for you here enjoy....


Alzheimer's disease (AD), also called Alzheimer disease, senile dementia of the Alzheimer type, primary degenerative dementia of the Alzheimer's type, or simply Alzheimer's, is the most common form of dementia. This incurable, degenerative, and terminal disease was first described by German psychiatrist and neuropathologist Alois Alzheimer in 1906 and was named after him.


some more for you... some history


The ancient Greek and Roman philosophers and physicians associated old age with increasing dementia.[1] It was not until 1901 that German psychiatrist Alois Alzheimer identified the first case of what became known as Alzheimer's disease in a fifty-year-old woman he called Auguste D. Alzheimer followed her until she died in 1906, when he first reported the case publicly.[200] During the next five years, eleven similar cases were reported in the medical literature, some of them already using the term Alzheimer's disease.[1] The disease was first described as a distinctive disease by Emil Kraepelin after suppressing some of the clinical (delusions and hallucinations) and pathological features (arteriosclerotic changes) contained in the original report of Auguste D.[201] He included Alzheimer's disease, also named presenile dementia by Kraepelin, as a subtype of senile dementia in the eighth edition of his Textbook of Psychiatry, published in 1910.[


en.wikipedia.org...

And because there is so much info to post here is a link for some more info and guess what no mention of chemtrails figure that.

www.nih.gov...

As far as chemtrails and alzheimers.


Research, research, and my god do some research.
edit on 5-6-2011 by tsurfer2000h because: spelling



posted on Jun, 5 2011 @ 09:45 PM
link   
reply to post by TheRealMrX
 





No, I don't engage in critical thinking.


Really does prove alot about the content of your posts now doesn't it.



posted on Jun, 5 2011 @ 11:55 PM
link   
reply to post by sonnny1
 

How many times do I have to answer this question?????????????????????? I don't claim to know why. All I know is their stated reason which is that it is to save us from global warming. Satisfied?



posted on Jun, 5 2011 @ 11:59 PM
link   

Originally posted by TheRealMrX
reply to post by sonnny1
 

All I know is their stated reason which is that it is to save us from global warming. Satisfied?



Who is it said they were doing chemtrails for that purpose??


edit on 6-6-2011 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 12:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheRealMrX
reply to post by sonnny1
 

How many times do I have to answer this question?????????????????????? I don't claim to know why. All I know is their stated reason which is that it is to save us from global warming. Satisfied?



So "they" are saving "us" from global warming?????????

Can you offer any proof,on said opinion,other then "personal" visual proof?

I would be satisfied with data from said aircraft,or witness testimony from those spraying as good enough proof.



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 12:07 AM
link   
reply to post by TheRealMrX
 




No, I don't engage in critical thinking. That is why I participate in this forum.


Oh man, that is gold!

A new signature line for me, thanks!



posted on Jun, 6 2011 @ 12:10 AM
link   
reply to post by Chadwickus
 




I thought about using that also..........

One more time!!!!!





posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 06:47 PM
link   
Do you people really need evidence to see something is wrong with your sky? Anyone over 30 should be able to tell you that the amount and persistence of modern "contrails" is not normal. Why do they stay in the sky forever now when they used to fade away behind the jet spraying them? The sky never looked like this in the 80's and yet jet engines were the same back them. WAKE UP people!
edit on 27-1-2012 by inmate2276 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 07:56 PM
link   
reply to post by inmate2276
 


If you've got to be over 30 to remember the difference, then how do you explain that so many people who beleive in the theory are under 30? Even college age kids, 20 years old and younger believe in it.

Why is that? What evidence are THEY basing their belief on?



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 08:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by inmate2276
Do you people really need evidence to see something is wrong with your sky? Anyone over 30 should be able to tell you that the amount and persistence of modern "contrails" is not normal. Why do they stay in the sky forever now when they used to fade away behind the jet spraying them? The sky never looked like this in the 80's and yet jet engines were the same back them. WAKE UP people!


I am over 30 and I remember contrails that stayed around for hours from the late 1960's - that was when National Airways Corporation in New Zealand started flying Boeing 737-200's. A few years later in the mid 1970's I started an apprenticeship as an aircraft mechanic with NAC and was working on those same aircraft.

Certainly three are a lot more contrails these days, and therefore many more that hang around - no one disputes that at all.

However that is an entirely different thing from them being some super-secret conspiracy to fix global warming or help HAARP or hide Nibiru or whichever version of the myth you believe in - there is not a singe piece of verifiable evidence for anything along those lines at all.



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:37 PM
link   
Things that didn't exist when I was a kid (in the 80's);

Most of the clouds on the new cloud charts issued by N.A.S.A.
So many lasting trails in the sky that they block out the sun (EVER).
The term "Global Warming" (which turned out to be a fraud see: climategate)
H.A.A.R.P. Clouds
Chembows
Clouds that leak (proof they are not just water vapor)
Fog all year round (regardless of humidity)
Mass animal deaths, birds, fish, dolphins, whales turning up dead in the thousands with hardly any media coverage.

The skies have changed drastically, If I am wrong about this being a military operation, please explain this to me.



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:53 PM
link   
reply to post by inmate2276
 

Things that do not exist now that did not exist in the 80s (well past the time I could have been considered a kid).
1) New types of clouds. However an effort is being made to assign a new classification to one type of cloud which has been observed for some time (before the 80s). That would be Undulatus Asperatus. If it is done it will be the first new classification since 1951.
2) HAARP clouds. HAARP affects only the ionosphere, many miles higher than any clouds form.



Persistent contrails have existed for as long as aircraft have been able to fly high enough to produce them. There are however, more of them now because there is more air traffic at those altitudes.

It is true that the realization that the climate was warming did not become recognized until the late '80s, early 90's.

What's a "chembow"?

Clouds have been leaking for quite a while. Producing rain, snow, and hail.

Mass deaths have occurred for quite a while as well. With a lack of the internet, not many people heard about it except in the places it occurred.

You are wrong about it being a military operation. It is the result of mostly commercial air traffic.

edit on 1/27/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 10:59 PM
link   
reply to post by inmate2276
 


This is incorrect:


The sky never looked like this in the 80's and yet jet engines were the same back them. WAKE UP people!


The jet engines today are not all the same as those in the past, thirty+ years ago.

The modern very fuel efficient high-bypass turbofan engines are responsible for the more persistent nature of contrails, today. Besides the fact that there are a LOT more airplanes, too.....they get noticed for those two primary reasons.

Saw a figure in another thread....in 1975, in the ConUS (Contiguous United States) there were about 2,500 jet airliners being operated by various companies. Today, there are about 8,000......



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 11:03 PM
link   


People would freak out seeing a sky like this in the 80's, whatever the reason this need to stop. Global Warming was proven to be a fraud, and yet the weather is changing drastically. We need to stop this.



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 11:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by inmate2276


People would freak out seeing a sky like this in the 80's

No they wouldn't. In the 80s people knew what contrails are. From 1970:

The spreading out of jet contrails into extensive cirrus sheets is a familiar sight. Often, when persistent conditions exist from 25,000 to 40,000ft, several long contrails increase in number and gradually merge into an almost solid interlaced sheet.

journals.ametsoc.org...


Global Warming was proven to be a fraud, and yet the weather is changing drastically.

When was global warming (climate change if you wish) proven to be a fraud? Don't you see the contradiction in your statements?
edit on 1/27/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2012 @ 11:07 PM
link   
Even their own P.R. guy for H.A.A.R.P. admits it can be used to manipulate the jet stream. Chemtrails are mentioned by name in one of their aerospace bills. There is ample proof that this is going on. But for people who have been watching the skies their whole lives, they don't need the evidence, you guys might want to check it out though.




top topics



 
18
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join