It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So the theory is to prove that chemtrails exist by not posting about them??!!
Actually, you left out what happens on September 1st. Hence the question.
Originally posted by Frater210
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
So the theory is to prove that chemtrails exist by not posting about them??!!
It's 'ChemTrail' PowerPoster, Aloysius The Gaul.
Is that really all that you got from that post above?
Please read it again and get back to me. Or not.
We need to stop feeding the system. Do not reply to any thread having to do with ChemTrails at all.
Even this one if you can help it.
Didn't you even like the Radiohead song?
Hence - you're not goign to post to any "chemtrail" threads, not reply to any threads - you are proposing a total boycott of all things chemtrail by the chemtrail believer congregation.
if you can't put your point into your own words
who knows ?
maybe the posting of:
Contrails do not Exist!!! Prove me wrong!
by DerepentLeStranger
A Denial of Ignorance
Wherein a contrail conspiracy is revealed
and it's proponents unmasked as pedlars of Pseudo-Science
A proposal or two for an experiment is provided,
And the IHM is short-circuited to the dismay of it's Con-trollers
"There is a principle which cannot fail but keep a man in everlasting ignorance, that priniciple is contempt prior to investigation" ~ Self-evident
Truth
Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts. - Richard Feynman Nobel-prize-winning physicist
“Damn the particle,
but there is salvation for the aggregate
A gust of wind is wild and free,
but there are handcuffs on the storm”.
Charles Fort, 1923
An editorial in the New York Sun, Sept. 3, 1930:
“The public is being played upon and entirely mislead by the dreamery of the rival mathematicians, astronomers and physicists-not to mention the clerics-who are raising the game of notoriety to a fine art.
In rivalry to religious mysticism, a scientific pornography is being developed, and attracts the more because it is mysterious.”
These are the views of Professor Henry E. Armstrong, emeritus head of the department of chemistry, at City and Guilds College, South Kensington, London.
This is revolt inside. That is what develops in to revolution.
Professor Armstrong’s accusations of pornography may seem unduly stimulating: but, judging by their lecheries in other respects, one sees that all that the astronomers have to do is discover that stars have sex and they’ll have us sneaking to bookstores, for salacious “pronouncements” and “determinations” upon the latest celestial scandals. This would popularize them. And after anything becomes popular-then what?
Charles Fort, Lo! 1931